分流出院患者 7 天内再次入院的相关因素:一项病例对照研究。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001156
Jari Ylä-Mattila, Teemu Koivistoinen, Henna Siippainen, Heini Huhtala, Sami Mustajoki
{"title":"分流出院患者 7 天内再次入院的相关因素:一项病例对照研究。","authors":"Jari Ylä-Mattila, Teemu Koivistoinen, Henna Siippainen, Heini Huhtala, Sami Mustajoki","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Existing data are limited for determining the medical conditions best suited for an emergency department (ED) redirection strategy in a heterogeneous, nonurgent patient population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to establish factors associated with hospital revisits within 7 days among patients discharged or redirected by a triage team.</p><p><strong>Design, settings, and participants: </strong>An observational single-center case-control study was conducted at the Tampere University Hospital ED for the full calendar year of 2019. The cases comprised unplanned hospital revisits within 7 days of being discharged or redirected by triage, while the controls were discharged or redirected but did not revisit.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>The primary outcome was an unplanned hospital revisit within 7 days. A subgroup analysis was conducted for revisits leading to hospitalization. Basic demographics, comorbidities before triage, and triage visit characteristics were considered as predictive factors for the revisit. A backward stepwise conditional logistic regression analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>During the calendar year of 2019, there were a total of 92 406 ED visits. Of these, 7216 (7.8%) visits were discharged or redirected by triage, and 6.5% (n = 467) of all these patients revisited. Of the revisiting patients, 25% (n = 117) were hospitalized. In multivariable analysis, higher age was associated with both revisitation [odds ratio (OR): 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.02] and hospitalization (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.04). Furthermore, using other visits as a reference, abdominal pain was associated with revisitation and hospitalization (OR: 3.70, 95% CI: 2.24-6.11 and OR: 5.28, 95% CI: 2.08-13.4, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher age and abdominal pain were associated with hospital revisitation and hospitalization within 7 days among patients directly discharged or redirected by the triage team. Regardless of the triage system in use, there might be patient groups that should be evaluated more cautiously if a triage-based discharge or redirection strategy is to be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with hospital revisitation within 7 days among patients discharged at triage: a case-control study.\",\"authors\":\"Jari Ylä-Mattila, Teemu Koivistoinen, Henna Siippainen, Heini Huhtala, Sami Mustajoki\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Existing data are limited for determining the medical conditions best suited for an emergency department (ED) redirection strategy in a heterogeneous, nonurgent patient population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to establish factors associated with hospital revisits within 7 days among patients discharged or redirected by a triage team.</p><p><strong>Design, settings, and participants: </strong>An observational single-center case-control study was conducted at the Tampere University Hospital ED for the full calendar year of 2019. The cases comprised unplanned hospital revisits within 7 days of being discharged or redirected by triage, while the controls were discharged or redirected but did not revisit.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>The primary outcome was an unplanned hospital revisit within 7 days. A subgroup analysis was conducted for revisits leading to hospitalization. Basic demographics, comorbidities before triage, and triage visit characteristics were considered as predictive factors for the revisit. A backward stepwise conditional logistic regression analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>During the calendar year of 2019, there were a total of 92 406 ED visits. Of these, 7216 (7.8%) visits were discharged or redirected by triage, and 6.5% (n = 467) of all these patients revisited. Of the revisiting patients, 25% (n = 117) were hospitalized. In multivariable analysis, higher age was associated with both revisitation [odds ratio (OR): 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.02] and hospitalization (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.04). Furthermore, using other visits as a reference, abdominal pain was associated with revisitation and hospitalization (OR: 3.70, 95% CI: 2.24-6.11 and OR: 5.28, 95% CI: 2.08-13.4, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher age and abdominal pain were associated with hospital revisitation and hospitalization within 7 days among patients directly discharged or redirected by the triage team. Regardless of the triage system in use, there might be patient groups that should be evaluated more cautiously if a triage-based discharge or redirection strategy is to be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001156\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和重要性:在确定最适合急诊科(ED)转诊策略的异质性非急诊患者群体的医疗条件方面,现有数据十分有限:目的:确定与分诊小组分流或转诊患者 7 天内再次入院相关的因素:坦佩雷大学医院急诊科在 2019 年全年开展了一项观察性单中心病例对照研究。病例包括出院或分流转诊后 7 天内的计划外医院复诊,而对照组则是出院或转诊但未复诊:主要结果是 7 天内的计划外医院复诊。对导致住院的再次就诊进行了分组分析。基本人口统计学特征、分诊前的合并症和分诊就诊特征被视为再次就诊的预测因素。进行了后向逐步条件逻辑回归分析:在 2019 日历年期间,共有 92 406 人次到急诊室就诊。其中,7216 人次(7.8%)通过分诊出院或转院,所有这些患者中有 6.5%(n = 467)再次就诊。在再次就诊的患者中,25%(n = 117)被送进了医院。在多变量分析中,较高的年龄与再次就诊[几率比(OR):1.01,95% 置信区间(CI):1.00-1.02]和住院(OR:1.02,95% CI:1.00-1.04)相关。此外,以其他就诊作为参考,腹痛与复诊和住院相关(OR:3.70,95% CI:2.24-6.11;OR:5.28,95% CI:2.08-13.4):在直接出院或由分诊小组转诊的患者中,较高的年龄和腹痛与再次入院和 7 天内住院有关。无论使用哪种分诊系统,如果要考虑基于分诊的出院或转院策略,可能都需要对某些患者群体进行更谨慎的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors associated with hospital revisitation within 7 days among patients discharged at triage: a case-control study.

Background and importance: Existing data are limited for determining the medical conditions best suited for an emergency department (ED) redirection strategy in a heterogeneous, nonurgent patient population.

Objective: The aim was to establish factors associated with hospital revisits within 7 days among patients discharged or redirected by a triage team.

Design, settings, and participants: An observational single-center case-control study was conducted at the Tampere University Hospital ED for the full calendar year of 2019. The cases comprised unplanned hospital revisits within 7 days of being discharged or redirected by triage, while the controls were discharged or redirected but did not revisit.

Outcome measures and analysis: The primary outcome was an unplanned hospital revisit within 7 days. A subgroup analysis was conducted for revisits leading to hospitalization. Basic demographics, comorbidities before triage, and triage visit characteristics were considered as predictive factors for the revisit. A backward stepwise conditional logistic regression analysis was performed.

Main results: During the calendar year of 2019, there were a total of 92 406 ED visits. Of these, 7216 (7.8%) visits were discharged or redirected by triage, and 6.5% (n = 467) of all these patients revisited. Of the revisiting patients, 25% (n = 117) were hospitalized. In multivariable analysis, higher age was associated with both revisitation [odds ratio (OR): 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.02] and hospitalization (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.04). Furthermore, using other visits as a reference, abdominal pain was associated with revisitation and hospitalization (OR: 3.70, 95% CI: 2.24-6.11 and OR: 5.28, 95% CI: 2.08-13.4, respectively).

Conclusion: Higher age and abdominal pain were associated with hospital revisitation and hospitalization within 7 days among patients directly discharged or redirected by the triage team. Regardless of the triage system in use, there might be patient groups that should be evaluated more cautiously if a triage-based discharge or redirection strategy is to be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field. Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
期刊最新文献
Procedural sedation in the emergency department by Italian emergency physicians: results of the SEED SIMEU registry. Association between time to antibiotic and mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the Emergency Department: post hoc analysis of the 1-BED randomized clinical trial. Association between lactate determined at emergency department arrival and the probability of inhospital mortality and intensive care admission in elderly patients. A decade of European Board Examination in Emergency Medicine: achievements and future perspectives. Contribution of point-of-care ultrasound in the prehospital management of patients with non-trauma acute dyspnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1