应用环境监测计划和根本原因分析来确定和实施干预措施,以减少或消除苹果包装车间中的李斯特菌。

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Journal of food protection Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100324
Alexandra Belias, Samantha Bolten, Renato H. Orsi, Martin Wiedmann
{"title":"应用环境监测计划和根本原因分析来确定和实施干预措施,以减少或消除苹果包装车间中的李斯特菌。","authors":"Alexandra Belias,&nbsp;Samantha Bolten,&nbsp;Renato H. Orsi,&nbsp;Martin Wiedmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Controlling <em>Listeria</em> in produce packinghouses can be challenging due to the large number of potential contamination routes. For example, repeated isolation of the same <em>Listeria</em> subtype in a packinghouse could indicate persistence in the packinghouse or reintroduction of the same <em>Listeria</em> from an upstream source. To improve understanding of <em>Listeria</em> transmission patterns in packinghouses, we performed a longitudinal study in four apple packinghouses, including testing of 1,339 environmental sponges and whole genome sequencing (WGS)-based characterization of 280 isolates. Root cause analysis and subsequent intervention implementation were also performed and assessed for effectiveness. <em>Listeria</em> prevalence among environmental sponges collected from the four packinghouses was 20% (range of 5–31% for individual packinghouses). Sites that showed high <em>Listeria</em> prevalence included drains, forklift tires and forks, forklift stops, and waxing area equipment frames. A total of 240/280 WGS-characterized isolates were represented in 41 clusters, each containing two or more isolates that differed by ≤50 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphisms (hqSNPs); 21 clusters were isolated from one packinghouse over ≥2 samplings (suggesting persistence or possibly reintroduction), while 11 clusters included isolates from &gt;2 packinghouses, suggesting common upstream sources. Some interventions successfully (i) reduced <em>Listeria</em> detection on forklift tires and forks (across packinghouses) and (ii) mitigated packinghouse-specific <em>Listeria</em> issues (e.g., in catch pans). However, interventions that lacked enhanced equipment disassembly when persistence was suspected typically appeared to be unsuccessful. Overall, while our data suggest a combination of intensive environmental sampling with subtyping and root cause analysis can help identify effective interventions, implementation of effective interventions continues to be a challenge in packinghouses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"87 8","pages":"Article 100324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X2400108X/pdfft?md5=bd8cd52e11679eb2422ef3e86b76fe6a&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X2400108X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Environmental Monitoring Programs and Root Cause Analysis to Identify and Implement Interventions to Reduce or Eliminate Listeria Populations in Apple Packinghouses\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Belias,&nbsp;Samantha Bolten,&nbsp;Renato H. Orsi,&nbsp;Martin Wiedmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Controlling <em>Listeria</em> in produce packinghouses can be challenging due to the large number of potential contamination routes. For example, repeated isolation of the same <em>Listeria</em> subtype in a packinghouse could indicate persistence in the packinghouse or reintroduction of the same <em>Listeria</em> from an upstream source. To improve understanding of <em>Listeria</em> transmission patterns in packinghouses, we performed a longitudinal study in four apple packinghouses, including testing of 1,339 environmental sponges and whole genome sequencing (WGS)-based characterization of 280 isolates. Root cause analysis and subsequent intervention implementation were also performed and assessed for effectiveness. <em>Listeria</em> prevalence among environmental sponges collected from the four packinghouses was 20% (range of 5–31% for individual packinghouses). Sites that showed high <em>Listeria</em> prevalence included drains, forklift tires and forks, forklift stops, and waxing area equipment frames. A total of 240/280 WGS-characterized isolates were represented in 41 clusters, each containing two or more isolates that differed by ≤50 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphisms (hqSNPs); 21 clusters were isolated from one packinghouse over ≥2 samplings (suggesting persistence or possibly reintroduction), while 11 clusters included isolates from &gt;2 packinghouses, suggesting common upstream sources. Some interventions successfully (i) reduced <em>Listeria</em> detection on forklift tires and forks (across packinghouses) and (ii) mitigated packinghouse-specific <em>Listeria</em> issues (e.g., in catch pans). However, interventions that lacked enhanced equipment disassembly when persistence was suspected typically appeared to be unsuccessful. Overall, while our data suggest a combination of intensive environmental sampling with subtyping and root cause analysis can help identify effective interventions, implementation of effective interventions continues to be a challenge in packinghouses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"87 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 100324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X2400108X/pdfft?md5=bd8cd52e11679eb2422ef3e86b76fe6a&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X2400108X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X2400108X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X2400108X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于潜在的污染途径较多,因此控制农产品包装车间中的李斯特菌具有挑战性。例如,在包装车间重复分离出相同的李斯特菌亚型可能表明李斯特菌在包装车间内持续存在,或者是从上游源头再次引入相同的李斯特菌。为了更好地了解李斯特菌在包装车间的传播模式,我们在四个苹果包装车间开展了一项纵向研究,包括检测 1339 个环境海绵和基于全基因组测序 (WGS) 鉴定 280 个分离物。此外,还进行了根本原因分析和后续干预措施的实施,并对其有效性进行了评估。从四个包装厂收集的环境海绵中,李斯特菌的感染率为 20%(各包装厂的感染率范围为 5% 至 31%)。李斯特菌感染率较高的部位包括排水沟、叉车轮胎和叉子、叉车停靠点和打蜡区设备框架。总共有 240 个/280 个 WGS 鉴定的分离株分布在 41 个群组中,每个群组包含两个或两个以上的分离株,这些分离株之间的高质量单核苷酸多态性(hqSNPs)差异≤50;21 个群组从一个包装厂分离出来,采样次数≥2 次(表明这些分离株持续存在或可能重新引入),而 11 个群组包含来自超过 2 个包装厂的分离株,表明这些分离株有共同的上游来源。一些干预措施成功地:(i) 减少了叉车轮胎和叉子上李斯特菌的检出(跨包装厂);(ii) 缓解了包装厂特有的李斯特菌问题(如在接水盘中)。然而,在怀疑李斯特菌持续存在时不加强设备拆卸的干预措施似乎并不成功。总之,虽然我们的数据表明,将密集的环境采样与亚型分析和根本原因分析相结合有助于确定有效的干预措施,但在包装车间实施有效的干预措施仍然是一项挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of Environmental Monitoring Programs and Root Cause Analysis to Identify and Implement Interventions to Reduce or Eliminate Listeria Populations in Apple Packinghouses

Controlling Listeria in produce packinghouses can be challenging due to the large number of potential contamination routes. For example, repeated isolation of the same Listeria subtype in a packinghouse could indicate persistence in the packinghouse or reintroduction of the same Listeria from an upstream source. To improve understanding of Listeria transmission patterns in packinghouses, we performed a longitudinal study in four apple packinghouses, including testing of 1,339 environmental sponges and whole genome sequencing (WGS)-based characterization of 280 isolates. Root cause analysis and subsequent intervention implementation were also performed and assessed for effectiveness. Listeria prevalence among environmental sponges collected from the four packinghouses was 20% (range of 5–31% for individual packinghouses). Sites that showed high Listeria prevalence included drains, forklift tires and forks, forklift stops, and waxing area equipment frames. A total of 240/280 WGS-characterized isolates were represented in 41 clusters, each containing two or more isolates that differed by ≤50 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphisms (hqSNPs); 21 clusters were isolated from one packinghouse over ≥2 samplings (suggesting persistence or possibly reintroduction), while 11 clusters included isolates from >2 packinghouses, suggesting common upstream sources. Some interventions successfully (i) reduced Listeria detection on forklift tires and forks (across packinghouses) and (ii) mitigated packinghouse-specific Listeria issues (e.g., in catch pans). However, interventions that lacked enhanced equipment disassembly when persistence was suspected typically appeared to be unsuccessful. Overall, while our data suggest a combination of intensive environmental sampling with subtyping and root cause analysis can help identify effective interventions, implementation of effective interventions continues to be a challenge in packinghouses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
期刊最新文献
Integration of National Chemical Hazards Monitoring, Total Diet Study and Human Biomonitoring Programmes for Food Safety Exposure Assessment in Singapore. Unexplained illnesses associated with a subscription meal service, 2022. A Bi-national Sample-Initiated Retrospective Outbreak Investigation of Listeria monocytogenes Infections in the United States and Canada Linked to Enoki Mushrooms Imported from China 2022-2023. Demographic characteristics and county-level indicators of social vulnerability in salmonellosis outbreaks linked to ground beef- United States, 2012-2018. Survival of Generic Escherichia coli on In-Field Mature and Immature Gala and Golden Delicious Apples with or without Overhead Evaporative Cooling Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1