Alexandra Belias, Samantha Bolten, Renato H. Orsi, Martin Wiedmann
{"title":"应用环境监测计划和根本原因分析来确定和实施干预措施,以减少或消除苹果包装车间中的李斯特菌。","authors":"Alexandra Belias, Samantha Bolten, Renato H. Orsi, Martin Wiedmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Controlling <em>Listeria</em> in produce packinghouses can be challenging due to the large number of potential contamination routes. For example, repeated isolation of the same <em>Listeria</em> subtype in a packinghouse could indicate persistence in the packinghouse or reintroduction of the same <em>Listeria</em> from an upstream source. To improve understanding of <em>Listeria</em> transmission patterns in packinghouses, we performed a longitudinal study in four apple packinghouses, including testing of 1,339 environmental sponges and whole genome sequencing (WGS)-based characterization of 280 isolates. Root cause analysis and subsequent intervention implementation were also performed and assessed for effectiveness. <em>Listeria</em> prevalence among environmental sponges collected from the four packinghouses was 20% (range of 5–31% for individual packinghouses). Sites that showed high <em>Listeria</em> prevalence included drains, forklift tires and forks, forklift stops, and waxing area equipment frames. A total of 240/280 WGS-characterized isolates were represented in 41 clusters, each containing two or more isolates that differed by ≤50 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphisms (hqSNPs); 21 clusters were isolated from one packinghouse over ≥2 samplings (suggesting persistence or possibly reintroduction), while 11 clusters included isolates from >2 packinghouses, suggesting common upstream sources. Some interventions successfully (i) reduced <em>Listeria</em> detection on forklift tires and forks (across packinghouses) and (ii) mitigated packinghouse-specific <em>Listeria</em> issues (e.g., in catch pans). However, interventions that lacked enhanced equipment disassembly when persistence was suspected typically appeared to be unsuccessful. Overall, while our data suggest a combination of intensive environmental sampling with subtyping and root cause analysis can help identify effective interventions, implementation of effective interventions continues to be a challenge in packinghouses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"87 8","pages":"Article 100324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X2400108X/pdfft?md5=bd8cd52e11679eb2422ef3e86b76fe6a&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X2400108X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Environmental Monitoring Programs and Root Cause Analysis to Identify and Implement Interventions to Reduce or Eliminate Listeria Populations in Apple Packinghouses\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Belias, Samantha Bolten, Renato H. Orsi, Martin Wiedmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Controlling <em>Listeria</em> in produce packinghouses can be challenging due to the large number of potential contamination routes. For example, repeated isolation of the same <em>Listeria</em> subtype in a packinghouse could indicate persistence in the packinghouse or reintroduction of the same <em>Listeria</em> from an upstream source. To improve understanding of <em>Listeria</em> transmission patterns in packinghouses, we performed a longitudinal study in four apple packinghouses, including testing of 1,339 environmental sponges and whole genome sequencing (WGS)-based characterization of 280 isolates. Root cause analysis and subsequent intervention implementation were also performed and assessed for effectiveness. <em>Listeria</em> prevalence among environmental sponges collected from the four packinghouses was 20% (range of 5–31% for individual packinghouses). Sites that showed high <em>Listeria</em> prevalence included drains, forklift tires and forks, forklift stops, and waxing area equipment frames. A total of 240/280 WGS-characterized isolates were represented in 41 clusters, each containing two or more isolates that differed by ≤50 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphisms (hqSNPs); 21 clusters were isolated from one packinghouse over ≥2 samplings (suggesting persistence or possibly reintroduction), while 11 clusters included isolates from >2 packinghouses, suggesting common upstream sources. Some interventions successfully (i) reduced <em>Listeria</em> detection on forklift tires and forks (across packinghouses) and (ii) mitigated packinghouse-specific <em>Listeria</em> issues (e.g., in catch pans). However, interventions that lacked enhanced equipment disassembly when persistence was suspected typically appeared to be unsuccessful. Overall, while our data suggest a combination of intensive environmental sampling with subtyping and root cause analysis can help identify effective interventions, implementation of effective interventions continues to be a challenge in packinghouses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"87 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 100324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X2400108X/pdfft?md5=bd8cd52e11679eb2422ef3e86b76fe6a&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X2400108X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X2400108X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X2400108X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Application of Environmental Monitoring Programs and Root Cause Analysis to Identify and Implement Interventions to Reduce or Eliminate Listeria Populations in Apple Packinghouses
Controlling Listeria in produce packinghouses can be challenging due to the large number of potential contamination routes. For example, repeated isolation of the same Listeria subtype in a packinghouse could indicate persistence in the packinghouse or reintroduction of the same Listeria from an upstream source. To improve understanding of Listeria transmission patterns in packinghouses, we performed a longitudinal study in four apple packinghouses, including testing of 1,339 environmental sponges and whole genome sequencing (WGS)-based characterization of 280 isolates. Root cause analysis and subsequent intervention implementation were also performed and assessed for effectiveness. Listeria prevalence among environmental sponges collected from the four packinghouses was 20% (range of 5–31% for individual packinghouses). Sites that showed high Listeria prevalence included drains, forklift tires and forks, forklift stops, and waxing area equipment frames. A total of 240/280 WGS-characterized isolates were represented in 41 clusters, each containing two or more isolates that differed by ≤50 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphisms (hqSNPs); 21 clusters were isolated from one packinghouse over ≥2 samplings (suggesting persistence or possibly reintroduction), while 11 clusters included isolates from >2 packinghouses, suggesting common upstream sources. Some interventions successfully (i) reduced Listeria detection on forklift tires and forks (across packinghouses) and (ii) mitigated packinghouse-specific Listeria issues (e.g., in catch pans). However, interventions that lacked enhanced equipment disassembly when persistence was suspected typically appeared to be unsuccessful. Overall, while our data suggest a combination of intensive environmental sampling with subtyping and root cause analysis can help identify effective interventions, implementation of effective interventions continues to be a challenge in packinghouses.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.