{"title":"基于传统和遗传因素的妊娠糖尿病风险预测模型。","authors":"Ying Li, Xinli Zhong, Mengjiao Yang, Lu Yuan, Dandan Wang, Ting Li, Yanying Guo","doi":"10.1080/01443615.2024.2372665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent pregnancy complication during pregnancy. We aimed to evaluate a risk prediction model of GDM based on traditional and genetic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2744 eligible pregnant women were included. Face-to-face questionnaire surveys were conducted to gather general data. Serum test results were collected from the laboratory information system. Independent risk factors for GDM were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A GDM risk prediction model was constructed and evaluated with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, goodness-of-fit calibration plot, receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among traditional factors, age ≥30 years, family history, GDM history, impaired glucose tolerance history, systolic blood pressure ≥116.22 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥74.52 mmHg, fasting plasma glucose ≥5.0 mmol/L, 1-hour postprandial blood glucose ≥8.8 mmol/L, 2-h postprandial blood glucose ≥7.9 mmol/L, total cholesterol ≥4.50 mmol/L, low-density lipoprotein ≥2.09 mmol/L and insulin ≥11.5 mIU/L were independent risk factors for GDM. Among genetic factors, 11 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs2779116, rs5215, rs11605924, rs7072268, rs7172432, rs10811661, rs2191349, rs10830963, rs174550, rs13266634 and rs11071657) were identified as potential predictors of the risk of postpartum DM among women with GDM history, collectively accounting for 3.6% of the genetic risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both genetic and traditional factors contribute to the risk of GDM in women, operating through diverse mechanisms. Strengthening the risk prediction of SNPs for postpartum DM among women with GDM history is crucial for maternal and child health protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":16627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"44 1","pages":"2372665"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A risk prediction model of gestational diabetes mellitus based on traditional and genetic factors.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Li, Xinli Zhong, Mengjiao Yang, Lu Yuan, Dandan Wang, Ting Li, Yanying Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01443615.2024.2372665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent pregnancy complication during pregnancy. We aimed to evaluate a risk prediction model of GDM based on traditional and genetic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2744 eligible pregnant women were included. Face-to-face questionnaire surveys were conducted to gather general data. Serum test results were collected from the laboratory information system. Independent risk factors for GDM were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A GDM risk prediction model was constructed and evaluated with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, goodness-of-fit calibration plot, receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among traditional factors, age ≥30 years, family history, GDM history, impaired glucose tolerance history, systolic blood pressure ≥116.22 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥74.52 mmHg, fasting plasma glucose ≥5.0 mmol/L, 1-hour postprandial blood glucose ≥8.8 mmol/L, 2-h postprandial blood glucose ≥7.9 mmol/L, total cholesterol ≥4.50 mmol/L, low-density lipoprotein ≥2.09 mmol/L and insulin ≥11.5 mIU/L were independent risk factors for GDM. Among genetic factors, 11 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs2779116, rs5215, rs11605924, rs7072268, rs7172432, rs10811661, rs2191349, rs10830963, rs174550, rs13266634 and rs11071657) were identified as potential predictors of the risk of postpartum DM among women with GDM history, collectively accounting for 3.6% of the genetic risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both genetic and traditional factors contribute to the risk of GDM in women, operating through diverse mechanisms. Strengthening the risk prediction of SNPs for postpartum DM among women with GDM history is crucial for maternal and child health protection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"2372665\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2024.2372665\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2024.2372665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A risk prediction model of gestational diabetes mellitus based on traditional and genetic factors.
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent pregnancy complication during pregnancy. We aimed to evaluate a risk prediction model of GDM based on traditional and genetic factors.
Methods: A total of 2744 eligible pregnant women were included. Face-to-face questionnaire surveys were conducted to gather general data. Serum test results were collected from the laboratory information system. Independent risk factors for GDM were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A GDM risk prediction model was constructed and evaluated with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, goodness-of-fit calibration plot, receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve.
Results: Among traditional factors, age ≥30 years, family history, GDM history, impaired glucose tolerance history, systolic blood pressure ≥116.22 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥74.52 mmHg, fasting plasma glucose ≥5.0 mmol/L, 1-hour postprandial blood glucose ≥8.8 mmol/L, 2-h postprandial blood glucose ≥7.9 mmol/L, total cholesterol ≥4.50 mmol/L, low-density lipoprotein ≥2.09 mmol/L and insulin ≥11.5 mIU/L were independent risk factors for GDM. Among genetic factors, 11 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs2779116, rs5215, rs11605924, rs7072268, rs7172432, rs10811661, rs2191349, rs10830963, rs174550, rs13266634 and rs11071657) were identified as potential predictors of the risk of postpartum DM among women with GDM history, collectively accounting for 3.6% of the genetic risk.
Conclusions: Both genetic and traditional factors contribute to the risk of GDM in women, operating through diverse mechanisms. Strengthening the risk prediction of SNPs for postpartum DM among women with GDM history is crucial for maternal and child health protection.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology represents an established forum for the entire field of obstetrics and gynaecology, publishing a broad range of original, peer-reviewed papers, from scientific and clinical research to reviews relevant to practice. It also includes occasional supplements on clinical symposia. The journal is read widely by trainees in our specialty and we acknowledge a major role in education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Past and present editors have recognized the difficulties that junior doctors encounter in achieving their first publications and spend time advising authors during their initial attempts at submission. The journal continues to attract a world-wide readership thanks to the emphasis on practical applicability and its excellent record of drawing on an international base of authors.