2018 年至 2021 年韩国全国医院抗菌药物处方分析:2023 年 KONAS 报告

IF 2.8 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection and Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.3947/ic.2024.0013
I Ji Yun, Hyo Jung Park, Jungmi Chae, Seok-Jae Heo, Yong Chan Kim, Bongyoung Kim, Jun Yong Choi
{"title":"2018 年至 2021 年韩国全国医院抗菌药物处方分析:2023 年 KONAS 报告","authors":"I Ji Yun, Hyo Jung Park, Jungmi Chae, Seok-Jae Heo, Yong Chan Kim, Bongyoung Kim, Jun Yong Choi","doi":"10.3947/ic.2024.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on antimicrobial use at the national level are crucial for establishing domestic antimicrobial stewardship policies and enabling medical institutions to benchmark each other. This study aimed to analyze antimicrobial use in Korean hospitals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We investigated antimicrobials prescribed in Korean hospitals between 2018 and 2021 using data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment. Primary care hospitals (PCHs), secondary care hospitals (SCHs), and tertiary care hospitals (TCHs) were included in this analysis. Antimicrobials were categorized according to the Korea National Antimicrobial Use Analysis System (KONAS) classification, which is suitable for measuring antimicrobial use in Korean hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among over 1,900 hospitals, PCHs constituted the highest proportion, whereas TCHs had the lowest representation. The most frequently prescribed antimicrobials in 2021 were piperacillin/β-lactamase inhibitor (9.3%) in TCHs, ceftriaxone (11.0%) in SCHs, and cefazedone (18.9%) in PCHs. Between 2018 and 2021, the most used antimicrobial classes according to the KONAS classification were 'broad-spectrum antibacterial agents predominantly used for community-acquired infections' in SCHs and TCHs and 'narrow spectrum beta-lactam agents' in PCHs. Total consumption of antimicrobials decreased from 951.7 to 929.9 days of therapy (DOT)/1,000 patient-days in TCHs and 817.8 to 752.2 DOT/1,000 patient-days in SCHs during study period; however, no reduction was noted in PCHs (from 504.3 to 527.2 DOT/1,000 patient-days). Moreover, in 2021, the use of reserve antimicrobials decreased from 13.6 to 10.7 DOT/1,000 patient-days in TCHs and from 4.6 to 3.3 DOT/1,000 patient-days in SCHs. However, in PCHs, the use increased from 0.7 to 0.8 DOT/1,000 patient-days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed that antimicrobial use differed according to hospital type in Korea. Recent increases in the use of total and reserve antimicrobials in PCHs reflect the challenges that must be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51616,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Chemotherapy","volume":"56 2","pages":"256-265"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nationwide Analysis of Antimicrobial Prescription in Korean Hospitals between 2018 and 2021: The 2023 KONAS Report.\",\"authors\":\"I Ji Yun, Hyo Jung Park, Jungmi Chae, Seok-Jae Heo, Yong Chan Kim, Bongyoung Kim, Jun Yong Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.3947/ic.2024.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on antimicrobial use at the national level are crucial for establishing domestic antimicrobial stewardship policies and enabling medical institutions to benchmark each other. This study aimed to analyze antimicrobial use in Korean hospitals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We investigated antimicrobials prescribed in Korean hospitals between 2018 and 2021 using data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment. Primary care hospitals (PCHs), secondary care hospitals (SCHs), and tertiary care hospitals (TCHs) were included in this analysis. Antimicrobials were categorized according to the Korea National Antimicrobial Use Analysis System (KONAS) classification, which is suitable for measuring antimicrobial use in Korean hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among over 1,900 hospitals, PCHs constituted the highest proportion, whereas TCHs had the lowest representation. The most frequently prescribed antimicrobials in 2021 were piperacillin/β-lactamase inhibitor (9.3%) in TCHs, ceftriaxone (11.0%) in SCHs, and cefazedone (18.9%) in PCHs. Between 2018 and 2021, the most used antimicrobial classes according to the KONAS classification were 'broad-spectrum antibacterial agents predominantly used for community-acquired infections' in SCHs and TCHs and 'narrow spectrum beta-lactam agents' in PCHs. Total consumption of antimicrobials decreased from 951.7 to 929.9 days of therapy (DOT)/1,000 patient-days in TCHs and 817.8 to 752.2 DOT/1,000 patient-days in SCHs during study period; however, no reduction was noted in PCHs (from 504.3 to 527.2 DOT/1,000 patient-days). Moreover, in 2021, the use of reserve antimicrobials decreased from 13.6 to 10.7 DOT/1,000 patient-days in TCHs and from 4.6 to 3.3 DOT/1,000 patient-days in SCHs. However, in PCHs, the use increased from 0.7 to 0.8 DOT/1,000 patient-days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed that antimicrobial use differed according to hospital type in Korea. Recent increases in the use of total and reserve antimicrobials in PCHs reflect the challenges that must be addressed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection and Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"256-265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224044/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection and Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2024.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2024.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国家层面的抗菌药物使用数据对于制定国内抗菌药物管理政策和使医疗机构能够相互参照至关重要。本研究旨在分析韩国医院的抗菌药物使用情况:我们使用健康保险审查和评估的数据调查了 2018 年至 2021 年韩国医院的抗菌药物处方。本次分析包括初级保健医院(PCH)、二级保健医院(SCH)和三级保健医院(TCH)。抗菌药物根据韩国国家抗菌药物使用分析系统(KONAS)进行分类,该系统适用于衡量韩国医院的抗菌药物使用情况:在 1 900 多家医院中,初级保健医院所占比例最高,而中级保健医院所占比例最低。2021年,最常处方的抗菌药物是哌拉西林/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂(9.3%),头孢曲松(11.0%),头孢西酮(18.9%)。2018年至2021年期间,根据KONAS分类,使用最多的抗菌药物类别是:在社区卫生服务机构和三甲医院中 "主要用于社区获得性感染的广谱抗菌药物",以及在私立卫生院中 "窄谱β-内酰胺类药物"。在研究期间,公立医院和私家医院的抗菌药物总消耗量分别从951.7天和817.8天下降至929.9天和752.2天(每千名病人每天);而私家医院的抗菌药物总消耗量则没有下降(从504.3天下降至527.2天(每千名病人每天))。此外,在2021年,公立医院的备用抗菌药物使用量从13.6次/1,000个病人日降至10.7次/1,000个病人日,而私立医院则从4.6次/1,000个病人日降至3.3次/1,000个病人日。然而,在私立医院,抗菌药物的使用从 0.7 次/千病人日增加到 0.8 次/千病人日:这项研究证实,在韩国,抗菌药物的使用因医院类型而异。最近,公立医院抗菌药物总用量和储备用量的增加反映了必须应对的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nationwide Analysis of Antimicrobial Prescription in Korean Hospitals between 2018 and 2021: The 2023 KONAS Report.

Background: Data on antimicrobial use at the national level are crucial for establishing domestic antimicrobial stewardship policies and enabling medical institutions to benchmark each other. This study aimed to analyze antimicrobial use in Korean hospitals.

Materials and methods: We investigated antimicrobials prescribed in Korean hospitals between 2018 and 2021 using data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment. Primary care hospitals (PCHs), secondary care hospitals (SCHs), and tertiary care hospitals (TCHs) were included in this analysis. Antimicrobials were categorized according to the Korea National Antimicrobial Use Analysis System (KONAS) classification, which is suitable for measuring antimicrobial use in Korean hospitals.

Results: Among over 1,900 hospitals, PCHs constituted the highest proportion, whereas TCHs had the lowest representation. The most frequently prescribed antimicrobials in 2021 were piperacillin/β-lactamase inhibitor (9.3%) in TCHs, ceftriaxone (11.0%) in SCHs, and cefazedone (18.9%) in PCHs. Between 2018 and 2021, the most used antimicrobial classes according to the KONAS classification were 'broad-spectrum antibacterial agents predominantly used for community-acquired infections' in SCHs and TCHs and 'narrow spectrum beta-lactam agents' in PCHs. Total consumption of antimicrobials decreased from 951.7 to 929.9 days of therapy (DOT)/1,000 patient-days in TCHs and 817.8 to 752.2 DOT/1,000 patient-days in SCHs during study period; however, no reduction was noted in PCHs (from 504.3 to 527.2 DOT/1,000 patient-days). Moreover, in 2021, the use of reserve antimicrobials decreased from 13.6 to 10.7 DOT/1,000 patient-days in TCHs and from 4.6 to 3.3 DOT/1,000 patient-days in SCHs. However, in PCHs, the use increased from 0.7 to 0.8 DOT/1,000 patient-days.

Conclusion: This study confirmed that antimicrobial use differed according to hospital type in Korea. Recent increases in the use of total and reserve antimicrobials in PCHs reflect the challenges that must be addressed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection and Chemotherapy
Infection and Chemotherapy INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
11.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Quinolone Use during the First Trimester of Pregnancy and the Risk of Atopic Dermatitis, Asthma, and Allergies of Offspring during 2011 to 2020. Use of a Real-Time Locating System in Infection Control. Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of ST72 Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: Comparison with ST72 Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus. Clinical Outcomes of Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Hospitalized with COVID-19: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study. Addressing Campylobacter AMR Transmission in India: Urgent Policy Call.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1