2012-2017年中国城市的外包碳减排工作

Chengqi Xia, Heran Zheng, Jing Meng, Yuli Shan, Xi Liang, Jin Li, Zihua Yin, Minggu Chen, Pengfei Du, Can Wang
{"title":"2012-2017年中国城市的外包碳减排工作","authors":"Chengqi Xia, Heran Zheng, Jing Meng, Yuli Shan, Xi Liang, Jin Li, Zihua Yin, Minggu Chen, Pengfei Du, Can Wang","doi":"10.1038/s44284-024-00088-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Outsourced carbon mitigation between cities means that some cities benefit from the carbon mitigation efforts of other cities more than their own. This problem conceals the recognition of cities’ mitigation contributions. Here we quantify local and outsourced carbon mitigation levels from 2012 to 2017 and identified ‘outsourced mitigation beneficiaries’ relying on outsourced efforts more than their own among 309 Chinese cities by using a city-level input–output model. It found that the share of outsourced emissions rose from 78.6% to 81.9% during this period. In particular, 240 cities (77.7%) were outsourced mitigation beneficiaries, of which 65 were strong beneficiaries (their local carbon emissions still grew) and 175 cities were weak beneficiaries (with larger outsourced mitigation efforts than local mitigation efforts). Strong beneficiaries were often industrializing cities with more agriculture and light manufacturing, focusing on local economic growth. In contrast, weak beneficiaries were mainly at the downstream of supply chains with services and high-tech manufacturing, which have stronger connections with upstream heavy industry cities. The findings suggest the need for policies to manage outsourced mitigation of supply chains and encourage transformation, improving the fair acknowledgment of cities’ carbon mitigation efforts. This study identifies the phenomenon of outsourced carbon mitigation in Chinese cities. It found that about 78% of these cities outsource their carbon mitigation efforts in varying degrees, which affects the way carbon mitigation policies should work.","PeriodicalId":501700,"journal":{"name":"Nature Cities","volume":"1 7","pages":"480-488"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-024-00088-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outsourced carbon mitigation efforts of Chinese cities from 2012 to 2017\",\"authors\":\"Chengqi Xia, Heran Zheng, Jing Meng, Yuli Shan, Xi Liang, Jin Li, Zihua Yin, Minggu Chen, Pengfei Du, Can Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44284-024-00088-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Outsourced carbon mitigation between cities means that some cities benefit from the carbon mitigation efforts of other cities more than their own. This problem conceals the recognition of cities’ mitigation contributions. Here we quantify local and outsourced carbon mitigation levels from 2012 to 2017 and identified ‘outsourced mitigation beneficiaries’ relying on outsourced efforts more than their own among 309 Chinese cities by using a city-level input–output model. It found that the share of outsourced emissions rose from 78.6% to 81.9% during this period. In particular, 240 cities (77.7%) were outsourced mitigation beneficiaries, of which 65 were strong beneficiaries (their local carbon emissions still grew) and 175 cities were weak beneficiaries (with larger outsourced mitigation efforts than local mitigation efforts). Strong beneficiaries were often industrializing cities with more agriculture and light manufacturing, focusing on local economic growth. In contrast, weak beneficiaries were mainly at the downstream of supply chains with services and high-tech manufacturing, which have stronger connections with upstream heavy industry cities. The findings suggest the need for policies to manage outsourced mitigation of supply chains and encourage transformation, improving the fair acknowledgment of cities’ carbon mitigation efforts. This study identifies the phenomenon of outsourced carbon mitigation in Chinese cities. It found that about 78% of these cities outsource their carbon mitigation efforts in varying degrees, which affects the way carbon mitigation policies should work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Cities\",\"volume\":\"1 7\",\"pages\":\"480-488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-024-00088-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-024-00088-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-024-00088-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市之间的碳减排外包意味着一些城市从其他城市的碳减排努力中获益多于自身的努力。这一问题掩盖了对城市减排贡献的认可。在此,我们量化了2012年至2017年本地和外包的碳减排水平,并通过城市层面的投入产出模型,在中国309个城市中识别出依赖外包努力多于自身努力的 "外包减排受益者"。研究发现,在此期间,外包排放所占比例从 78.6%上升到 81.9%。其中,240 个城市(77.7%)是外包减排的受益者,其中 65 个城市是强受益者(本地碳排放仍在增长),175 个城市是弱受益者(外包减排努力大于本地减排努力)。强受益城市通常是工业化城市,农业和轻工业较多,注重本地经济增长。相比之下,弱受益者主要是供应链下游的服务业和高科技制造业,与上游重工业城市的联系更紧密。研究结果表明,需要制定政策来管理供应链的外包减排,鼓励转型,提高城市碳减排努力的公平认可度。本研究发现了中国城市的外包碳减排现象。研究发现,约 78% 的城市在不同程度上将其碳减排工作外包,这影响了碳减排政策的运作方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outsourced carbon mitigation efforts of Chinese cities from 2012 to 2017
Outsourced carbon mitigation between cities means that some cities benefit from the carbon mitigation efforts of other cities more than their own. This problem conceals the recognition of cities’ mitigation contributions. Here we quantify local and outsourced carbon mitigation levels from 2012 to 2017 and identified ‘outsourced mitigation beneficiaries’ relying on outsourced efforts more than their own among 309 Chinese cities by using a city-level input–output model. It found that the share of outsourced emissions rose from 78.6% to 81.9% during this period. In particular, 240 cities (77.7%) were outsourced mitigation beneficiaries, of which 65 were strong beneficiaries (their local carbon emissions still grew) and 175 cities were weak beneficiaries (with larger outsourced mitigation efforts than local mitigation efforts). Strong beneficiaries were often industrializing cities with more agriculture and light manufacturing, focusing on local economic growth. In contrast, weak beneficiaries were mainly at the downstream of supply chains with services and high-tech manufacturing, which have stronger connections with upstream heavy industry cities. The findings suggest the need for policies to manage outsourced mitigation of supply chains and encourage transformation, improving the fair acknowledgment of cities’ carbon mitigation efforts. This study identifies the phenomenon of outsourced carbon mitigation in Chinese cities. It found that about 78% of these cities outsource their carbon mitigation efforts in varying degrees, which affects the way carbon mitigation policies should work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From local to global and in between, urban context counts Long-term exposure to ambient benzene and brain disorders among urban adults Regulation of humid heat by urban green space across a climate wetness gradient Criminal governance and social order in Nottingham, England Unequal access to social, environmental and health amenities in US urban parks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1