为多样化智能系统达成术语共识:呼吁合作

IF 33.2 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES The Innovation Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100658
Brett J. Kagan, Michael Mahlis, Anjali Bhat, Josh Bongard, Victor M. Cole, Phillip Corlett, Christopher Gyngell, Thomas Hartung, Bianca Jupp, Michael Levin, Tamra Lysaght, Nicholas Opie, Adeel Razi, Lena Smirnova, Ian Tennant, Peter Thestrup Wade, Ge Wang
{"title":"为多样化智能系统达成术语共识:呼吁合作","authors":"Brett J. Kagan, Michael Mahlis, Anjali Bhat, Josh Bongard, Victor M. Cole, Phillip Corlett, Christopher Gyngell, Thomas Hartung, Bianca Jupp, Michael Levin, Tamra Lysaght, Nicholas Opie, Adeel Razi, Lena Smirnova, Ian Tennant, Peter Thestrup Wade, Ge Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disagreements about language use are common both between and within fields. Where interests require multidisciplinary collaboration or the field of research has the potential to impact society at large, it becomes critical to minimize these disagreements where possible. The development of diverse intelligent systems, regardless of the substrate (e.g., silicon vs. biology), is a case where both conditions are met. Significant advancements have occurred in the development of technology progressing toward these diverse intelligence systems. Whether progress is silicon based, such as the use of large language models, or through synthetic biology methods, such as the development of organoids, a clear need for a community-based approach to seeking consensus on nomenclature is now vital. Here, we welcome collaboration from the wider scientific community, proposing a pathway forward to achieving this intention, highlighting key terms and fields of relevance, and suggesting potential consensus-making methods to be applied.","PeriodicalId":36121,"journal":{"name":"The Innovation","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":33.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a nomenclature consensus for diverse intelligent systems: Call for collaboration\",\"authors\":\"Brett J. Kagan, Michael Mahlis, Anjali Bhat, Josh Bongard, Victor M. Cole, Phillip Corlett, Christopher Gyngell, Thomas Hartung, Bianca Jupp, Michael Levin, Tamra Lysaght, Nicholas Opie, Adeel Razi, Lena Smirnova, Ian Tennant, Peter Thestrup Wade, Ge Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Disagreements about language use are common both between and within fields. Where interests require multidisciplinary collaboration or the field of research has the potential to impact society at large, it becomes critical to minimize these disagreements where possible. The development of diverse intelligent systems, regardless of the substrate (e.g., silicon vs. biology), is a case where both conditions are met. Significant advancements have occurred in the development of technology progressing toward these diverse intelligence systems. Whether progress is silicon based, such as the use of large language models, or through synthetic biology methods, such as the development of organoids, a clear need for a community-based approach to seeking consensus on nomenclature is now vital. Here, we welcome collaboration from the wider scientific community, proposing a pathway forward to achieving this intention, highlighting key terms and fields of relevance, and suggesting potential consensus-making methods to be applied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Innovation\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":33.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100658\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100658","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语言使用方面的分歧在领域之间和领域内部都很常见。当利益需要多学科合作或研究领域有可能影响整个社会时,尽可能减少这些分歧就变得至关重要。开发多样化的智能系统,无论其基质是什么(如硅还是生物),就是同时满足这两个条件的例子。在开发这些多样化智能系统的技术过程中,已经取得了重大进展。无论是基于硅的进步,如大型语言模型的使用,还是通过合成生物学方法的进步,如有机体的发展,现在都迫切需要一种基于社区的方法来寻求术语上的共识。在此,我们欢迎广大科学界的合作,提出实现这一目标的途径,强调关键术语和相关领域,并建议可能采用的达成共识的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward a nomenclature consensus for diverse intelligent systems: Call for collaboration
Disagreements about language use are common both between and within fields. Where interests require multidisciplinary collaboration or the field of research has the potential to impact society at large, it becomes critical to minimize these disagreements where possible. The development of diverse intelligent systems, regardless of the substrate (e.g., silicon vs. biology), is a case where both conditions are met. Significant advancements have occurred in the development of technology progressing toward these diverse intelligence systems. Whether progress is silicon based, such as the use of large language models, or through synthetic biology methods, such as the development of organoids, a clear need for a community-based approach to seeking consensus on nomenclature is now vital. Here, we welcome collaboration from the wider scientific community, proposing a pathway forward to achieving this intention, highlighting key terms and fields of relevance, and suggesting potential consensus-making methods to be applied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Innovation
The Innovation MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
38.30
自引率
1.20%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Innovation is an interdisciplinary journal that aims to promote scientific application. It publishes cutting-edge research and high-quality reviews in various scientific disciplines, including physics, chemistry, materials, nanotechnology, biology, translational medicine, geoscience, and engineering. The journal adheres to the peer review and publishing standards of Cell Press journals. The Innovation is committed to serving scientists and the public. It aims to publish significant advances promptly and provides a transparent exchange platform. The journal also strives to efficiently promote the translation from scientific discovery to technological achievements and rapidly disseminate scientific findings worldwide. Indexed in the following databases, The Innovation has visibility in Scopus, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Web of Science, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), PubMed Central, Compendex (previously Ei index), INSPEC, and CABI A&I.
期刊最新文献
The evolutionary tale of lilies: Giant genomes derived from transposon insertions and polyploidization. Artificial intelligence is restructuring a new world. The rise of non-vdW moiré superlattices. Brainstem opioid peptidergic neurons regulate cough reflexes in mice. Improving risk stratification for 2022 European LeukemiaNet favorable-risk patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1