释放人工智能的力量:超越 NRCS-CN 方法的径流预测革命

IF 1.827 Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences Arabian Journal of Geosciences Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1007/s12517-024-12031-1
Suryakant Bajirao Tarate, Shailendra Mohan Raut
{"title":"释放人工智能的力量:超越 NRCS-CN 方法的径流预测革命","authors":"Suryakant Bajirao Tarate, Shailendra Mohan Raut","doi":"10.1007/s12517-024-12031-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Predicting runoff is vital for effectively planning and managing water resources within a watershed or river basin. This research aims to compare the effectiveness of two distinct approaches in predicting daily runoff within the Koyna River basin in India from 1999 to 2011. The approaches examined are an artificial intelligence-based data-driven model, specifically an artificial neural network (ANN), and a conceptual-based model, the Natural Resource Conservation Service Curve Number (NRCS-CN) method. The ANN model employs a data-driven approach that utilizes historical runoff data to train the model, allowing it to capture nonlinear relationships and complexities in runoff dynamics. In contrast, the NRCS-CN method uses a conceptual-based approach, relying on empirical relationships and soil cover complex data to estimate runoff. The performance of both models was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) as a key metric. The study highlights a significant difference in predictive performance between the two methodologies. The NRCS-CN method achieved an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.37, whereas the ANN model significantly improved the predictive accuracy, achieving an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.88. This substantial increase demonstrates the ANN model’s superior ability to capture the complexities of daily runoff dynamics compared to the NRCS-CN method. In conclusion, the findings strongly advocate for the efficacy of the data-driven ANN model over the conceptual-based NRCS-CN model for daily runoff prediction. The superior performance of the ANN model provides valuable insights for enhancing water resource management through advanced artificial intelligence techniques. These results suggest that integrating AI-driven models can significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of runoff predictions, thereby supporting more effective water resource planning and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":476,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8270,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unleashing the power of AI: revolutionizing runoff prediction beyond NRCS-CN method\",\"authors\":\"Suryakant Bajirao Tarate, Shailendra Mohan Raut\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12517-024-12031-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Predicting runoff is vital for effectively planning and managing water resources within a watershed or river basin. This research aims to compare the effectiveness of two distinct approaches in predicting daily runoff within the Koyna River basin in India from 1999 to 2011. The approaches examined are an artificial intelligence-based data-driven model, specifically an artificial neural network (ANN), and a conceptual-based model, the Natural Resource Conservation Service Curve Number (NRCS-CN) method. The ANN model employs a data-driven approach that utilizes historical runoff data to train the model, allowing it to capture nonlinear relationships and complexities in runoff dynamics. In contrast, the NRCS-CN method uses a conceptual-based approach, relying on empirical relationships and soil cover complex data to estimate runoff. The performance of both models was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) as a key metric. The study highlights a significant difference in predictive performance between the two methodologies. The NRCS-CN method achieved an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.37, whereas the ANN model significantly improved the predictive accuracy, achieving an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.88. This substantial increase demonstrates the ANN model’s superior ability to capture the complexities of daily runoff dynamics compared to the NRCS-CN method. In conclusion, the findings strongly advocate for the efficacy of the data-driven ANN model over the conceptual-based NRCS-CN model for daily runoff prediction. The superior performance of the ANN model provides valuable insights for enhancing water resource management through advanced artificial intelligence techniques. These results suggest that integrating AI-driven models can significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of runoff predictions, thereby supporting more effective water resource planning and management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arabian Journal of Geosciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8270,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arabian Journal of Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-12031-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-12031-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预测径流对于有效规划和管理流域或河流盆地内的水资源至关重要。本研究旨在比较两种不同方法在预测 1999 年至 2011 年印度科伊纳河流域日径流量方面的有效性。这两种方法分别是基于人工智能的数据驱动模型(特别是人工神经网络 (ANN))和基于概念的模型(自然资源保护服务曲线数 (NRCS-CN) 方法)。人工神经网络模型采用数据驱动法,利用历史径流数据来训练模型,使其能够捕捉径流动态中的非线性关系和复杂性。相比之下,NRCS-CN 方法采用基于概念的方法,依靠经验关系和土壤覆盖的复杂数据来估算径流。两种模型的性能均以判定系数 (R2) 作为关键指标进行评估。研究结果表明,两种方法在预测性能方面存在显著差异。NRCS-CN 方法的 R2 为 0.37,而 ANN 模型显著提高了预测精度,R2 达到 0.88。这一大幅提高表明,与 NRCS-CN 方法相比,ANN 模型在捕捉每日径流动态的复杂性方面具有更强的能力。总之,研究结果有力地证明了数据驱动的 ANN 模型比基于概念的 NRCS-CN 模型在日径流预测方面更有效。人工智能模型的卓越性能为通过先进的人工智能技术加强水资源管理提供了宝贵的见解。这些结果表明,集成人工智能驱动的模型可以显著提高径流预测的准确性和可靠性,从而支持更有效的水资源规划和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unleashing the power of AI: revolutionizing runoff prediction beyond NRCS-CN method

Predicting runoff is vital for effectively planning and managing water resources within a watershed or river basin. This research aims to compare the effectiveness of two distinct approaches in predicting daily runoff within the Koyna River basin in India from 1999 to 2011. The approaches examined are an artificial intelligence-based data-driven model, specifically an artificial neural network (ANN), and a conceptual-based model, the Natural Resource Conservation Service Curve Number (NRCS-CN) method. The ANN model employs a data-driven approach that utilizes historical runoff data to train the model, allowing it to capture nonlinear relationships and complexities in runoff dynamics. In contrast, the NRCS-CN method uses a conceptual-based approach, relying on empirical relationships and soil cover complex data to estimate runoff. The performance of both models was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2) as a key metric. The study highlights a significant difference in predictive performance between the two methodologies. The NRCS-CN method achieved an R2 of 0.37, whereas the ANN model significantly improved the predictive accuracy, achieving an R2 of 0.88. This substantial increase demonstrates the ANN model’s superior ability to capture the complexities of daily runoff dynamics compared to the NRCS-CN method. In conclusion, the findings strongly advocate for the efficacy of the data-driven ANN model over the conceptual-based NRCS-CN model for daily runoff prediction. The superior performance of the ANN model provides valuable insights for enhancing water resource management through advanced artificial intelligence techniques. These results suggest that integrating AI-driven models can significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of runoff predictions, thereby supporting more effective water resource planning and management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
Arabian Journal of Geosciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1587
审稿时长
6.7 months
期刊介绍: The Arabian Journal of Geosciences is the official journal of the Saudi Society for Geosciences and publishes peer-reviewed original and review articles on the entire range of Earth Science themes, focused on, but not limited to, those that have regional significance to the Middle East and the Euro-Mediterranean Zone. Key topics therefore include; geology, hydrogeology, earth system science, petroleum sciences, geophysics, seismology and crustal structures, tectonics, sedimentology, palaeontology, metamorphic and igneous petrology, natural hazards, environmental sciences and sustainable development, geoarchaeology, geomorphology, paleo-environment studies, oceanography, atmospheric sciences, GIS and remote sensing, geodesy, mineralogy, volcanology, geochemistry and metallogenesis.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Urban Transformation and Green Infrastructure in Bhilwara Through Machine Learning and Earth Observation Estimation of spatiotemporal dynamics of urban sprawl in Bengaluru Urban agglomeration using earth observation datasets Late Quaternary evolution, geomorphology, and prehistory of Umm Dabadib area, Kharga Oasis, Western Desert, Egypt Delineation of aquifers and evaluation of protective capacity using geoelectrical indices in the Vindhyan fringe belt, Mirzapur district, U.P., India Impacts of agriculture in the largest irrigated perimeter region from Latin America: effects on land degradation in the Samambaia River Basin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1