风险调整终身价值:使用单一指标调整客户风险程度

IF 6.3 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Bank Marketing Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1108/ijbm-12-2023-0645
Shweta Singh, B.P.S. Murthi, Ram C. Rao, Erin Steffes
{"title":"风险调整终身价值:使用单一指标调整客户风险程度","authors":"Shweta Singh, B.P.S. Murthi, Ram C. Rao, Erin Steffes","doi":"10.1108/ijbm-12-2023-0645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The current approach to valuing customers is based on the notion of discounted profit generated by the customers over the lifetime of the relationship, also known as customer lifetime value (CLV). However, in the financial services industry, the customers who contribute the most to the profitability of a firm are also the riskiest customers. If the riskiness of a customer is not considered, firms will overestimate the true value of that customer. This paper proposes a methodology to adjust CLV for different types of risk factors and creates a comprehensive measure of risk-adjusted lifetime value (RALTV).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using data from a major credit card company, we develop a measure of risk adjusted lifetime value (RALTV) that accounts for diverse types of customer risks. The model is estimated using Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Major findings indicate that rewards cardholders and affinity cardholders tend to score higher within the RALTV framework than non-rewards cardholders and non-affinity cardholders, respectively. Among the four different modes of acquisition, the Internet generates the highest RALTV, followed by direct mail.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper not only controls for different types of consumer risks in the financial industry and creates a comprehensive risk-adjusted lifetime value (RALTV) model but also shows empirically the value of using RALTV over CLV for predicting future performance of a set of customers. Further, we investigate the impact of a firm’s acquisition and retention strategies on RALTV. The measure of risk-adjusted lifetime value is invaluable for managers in financial services.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51401,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bank Marketing","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk-adjusted lifetime value: adjusting for customer riskiness using a single metric\",\"authors\":\"Shweta Singh, B.P.S. Murthi, Ram C. Rao, Erin Steffes\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijbm-12-2023-0645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The current approach to valuing customers is based on the notion of discounted profit generated by the customers over the lifetime of the relationship, also known as customer lifetime value (CLV). However, in the financial services industry, the customers who contribute the most to the profitability of a firm are also the riskiest customers. If the riskiness of a customer is not considered, firms will overestimate the true value of that customer. This paper proposes a methodology to adjust CLV for different types of risk factors and creates a comprehensive measure of risk-adjusted lifetime value (RALTV).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Using data from a major credit card company, we develop a measure of risk adjusted lifetime value (RALTV) that accounts for diverse types of customer risks. The model is estimated using Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Major findings indicate that rewards cardholders and affinity cardholders tend to score higher within the RALTV framework than non-rewards cardholders and non-affinity cardholders, respectively. Among the four different modes of acquisition, the Internet generates the highest RALTV, followed by direct mail.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This paper not only controls for different types of consumer risks in the financial industry and creates a comprehensive risk-adjusted lifetime value (RALTV) model but also shows empirically the value of using RALTV over CLV for predicting future performance of a set of customers. Further, we investigate the impact of a firm’s acquisition and retention strategies on RALTV. The measure of risk-adjusted lifetime value is invaluable for managers in financial services.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":51401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Bank Marketing\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Bank Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-12-2023-0645\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bank Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-12-2023-0645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 目前对客户进行估值的方法是基于客户在整个关系存续期间产生的贴现利润概念,也称为客户终身价值(CLV)。然而,在金融服务业,对公司盈利贡献最大的客户也是风险最高的客户。如果不考虑客户的风险性,企业就会高估该客户的真实价值。本文提出了一种根据不同类型的风险因素调整客户终身价值(CLV)的方法,并创建了风险调整终身价值(RALTV)的综合衡量标准。主要研究结果表明,在 RALTV 框架内,奖励卡持卡人和亲和卡持卡人的得分往往分别高于非奖励卡持卡人和非亲和卡持卡人。在四种不同的获取模式中,互联网产生的 RALTV 最高,其次是直邮。本文不仅控制了金融业不同类型的消费者风险,创建了一个全面的风险调整终身价值(RALTV)模型,还通过实证研究表明,在预测一组客户的未来表现时,使用 RALTV 比 CLV 更有价值。此外,我们还研究了企业的获取和保留战略对 RALTV 的影响。对于金融服务业的管理者来说,风险调整终身价值的衡量标准非常宝贵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk-adjusted lifetime value: adjusting for customer riskiness using a single metric

Purpose

The current approach to valuing customers is based on the notion of discounted profit generated by the customers over the lifetime of the relationship, also known as customer lifetime value (CLV). However, in the financial services industry, the customers who contribute the most to the profitability of a firm are also the riskiest customers. If the riskiness of a customer is not considered, firms will overestimate the true value of that customer. This paper proposes a methodology to adjust CLV for different types of risk factors and creates a comprehensive measure of risk-adjusted lifetime value (RALTV).

Design/methodology/approach

Using data from a major credit card company, we develop a measure of risk adjusted lifetime value (RALTV) that accounts for diverse types of customer risks. The model is estimated using Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA).

Findings

Major findings indicate that rewards cardholders and affinity cardholders tend to score higher within the RALTV framework than non-rewards cardholders and non-affinity cardholders, respectively. Among the four different modes of acquisition, the Internet generates the highest RALTV, followed by direct mail.

Originality/value

This paper not only controls for different types of consumer risks in the financial industry and creates a comprehensive risk-adjusted lifetime value (RALTV) model but also shows empirically the value of using RALTV over CLV for predicting future performance of a set of customers. Further, we investigate the impact of a firm’s acquisition and retention strategies on RALTV. The measure of risk-adjusted lifetime value is invaluable for managers in financial services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
18.90%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: International Journal of Bank Marketing (IJBM) aims to publish papers that relate to the marketing challenges of financial services providers around the globe. Preference is given to empirically-based research papers that expand on existing theories (or develop new ones) on customer behaviour in financial services settings. In addition, the journal is interested in helping academicians and practitioners in the field to better understand the discipline of financial services marketing, and as a result review papers and thought pieces are invited for submission.
期刊最新文献
Determinants of tweens’ saving intentions: a cross-sectional study What drives problematic Bitcoin investment behavior?: The role of financial literacy Dynamics of personal financial management: a bibliometric and systematic review on financial literacy, financial capability and financial behavior The augmenting role of digital banking in reconstructing women's economic empowerment Does leadership humility foster salesperson creativity? The serial mediating role of job satisfaction and knowledge sharing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1