{"title":"用于目测检测非洲猪瘟病毒的两种内部自制等温测定法的比较评估","authors":"Gyanendra Singh Sengar, Soumendu Chakravarti, Rajib Deb, Seema Rani Pegu, Pranav Anjaria, Joyshikh Sonowal, Swaraj Rajkhowa, Pranab Joyti Das, Vivek Kumar Gupta","doi":"10.1007/s12038-024-00451-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Owing to the lack of effective vaccines, current control measures and eradication strategies for the African swine fever virus (ASFV) rely on early detection and stringent stamping-out procedures. In the present study, we developed two independent isothermal amplification assays, namely, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and polymerase spiral reaction (PSR), for quick visualization of the ASFV genome in clinical samples. Additionally, a quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)-based hydrolysis probe assay was developed for comparative assessment of sensitivity with the developed isothermal assays. The analytical sensitivity of the LAMP, PSR, and qRT-PCR was found to be 2.64 ×10<sup>5</sup> copies/µL, 2.64 ×10<sup>2</sup> copies/µL, and 2.64 ×10<sup>1</sup> copies/µL, respectively. A total of 165 clinical samples was tested using the developed visual assays. The relative accuracy, relative specificity, and relative diagnostic sensitivity for LAMP vs PSR were found to be 95.37% vs 102.48%, 97.46% vs 101.36%, and 73.33% vs 113.33%, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":15171,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosciences","volume":"147 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative assessment of two in-house-built isothermal assays for visual detection of African swine fever virus\",\"authors\":\"Gyanendra Singh Sengar, Soumendu Chakravarti, Rajib Deb, Seema Rani Pegu, Pranav Anjaria, Joyshikh Sonowal, Swaraj Rajkhowa, Pranab Joyti Das, Vivek Kumar Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12038-024-00451-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Owing to the lack of effective vaccines, current control measures and eradication strategies for the African swine fever virus (ASFV) rely on early detection and stringent stamping-out procedures. In the present study, we developed two independent isothermal amplification assays, namely, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and polymerase spiral reaction (PSR), for quick visualization of the ASFV genome in clinical samples. Additionally, a quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)-based hydrolysis probe assay was developed for comparative assessment of sensitivity with the developed isothermal assays. The analytical sensitivity of the LAMP, PSR, and qRT-PCR was found to be 2.64 ×10<sup>5</sup> copies/µL, 2.64 ×10<sup>2</sup> copies/µL, and 2.64 ×10<sup>1</sup> copies/µL, respectively. A total of 165 clinical samples was tested using the developed visual assays. The relative accuracy, relative specificity, and relative diagnostic sensitivity for LAMP vs PSR were found to be 95.37% vs 102.48%, 97.46% vs 101.36%, and 73.33% vs 113.33%, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biosciences\",\"volume\":\"147 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-024-00451-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-024-00451-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于缺乏有效的疫苗,目前非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV)的控制措施和根除策略依赖于早期检测和严格的淘汰程序。在本研究中,我们开发了两种独立的等温扩增检测方法,即环路介导等温扩增(LAMP)和聚合酶螺旋反应(PSR),用于快速检测临床样本中的非洲猪瘟病毒基因组。此外,还开发了一种基于水解探针的定量实时 PCR(qRT-PCR)检测方法,用于与所开发的等温检测方法进行灵敏度比较评估。结果发现,LAMP、PSR 和 qRT-PCR 的分析灵敏度分别为 2.64 ×105 拷贝/微升、2.64 ×102 拷贝/微升和 2.64 ×101 拷贝/微升。使用所开发的可视化检测方法共检测了 165 份临床样本。结果发现,LAMP 与 PSR 的相对准确性、相对特异性和相对诊断灵敏度分别为 95.37% vs 102.48%、97.46% vs 101.36% 和 73.33% vs 113.33%。
Comparative assessment of two in-house-built isothermal assays for visual detection of African swine fever virus
Owing to the lack of effective vaccines, current control measures and eradication strategies for the African swine fever virus (ASFV) rely on early detection and stringent stamping-out procedures. In the present study, we developed two independent isothermal amplification assays, namely, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and polymerase spiral reaction (PSR), for quick visualization of the ASFV genome in clinical samples. Additionally, a quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)-based hydrolysis probe assay was developed for comparative assessment of sensitivity with the developed isothermal assays. The analytical sensitivity of the LAMP, PSR, and qRT-PCR was found to be 2.64 ×105 copies/µL, 2.64 ×102 copies/µL, and 2.64 ×101 copies/µL, respectively. A total of 165 clinical samples was tested using the developed visual assays. The relative accuracy, relative specificity, and relative diagnostic sensitivity for LAMP vs PSR were found to be 95.37% vs 102.48%, 97.46% vs 101.36%, and 73.33% vs 113.33%, respectively.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biosciences is a quarterly journal published by the Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore. It covers all areas of Biology and is the premier journal in the country within its scope. It is indexed in Current Contents and other standard Biological and Medical databases. The Journal of Biosciences began in 1934 as the Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences (Section B). This continued until 1978 when it was split into three parts : Proceedings-Animal Sciences, Proceedings-Plant Sciences and Proceedings-Experimental Biology. Proceedings-Experimental Biology was renamed Journal of Biosciences in 1979; and in 1991, Proceedings-Animal Sciences and Proceedings-Plant Sciences merged with it.