{"title":"人格障碍:自恋型、边缘型、反社会型及其他类型的简史》,Allan V. Horwitz 著(评论)","authors":"Sharrona Pearl","doi":"10.1353/bhm.2024.a929788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Personality Disorders: A Short History of Narcissistic, Borderline, Antisocial, and Other Types</em> by Allan V. Horwitz <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Sharrona Pearl </li> </ul> Allan V. Horwitz. <em>Personality Disorders: A Short History of Narcissistic, Borderline, Antisocial, and Other Types</em>. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023. xii + 227 pp. $35.00 (978-1-4214-4610-3). <p>Here's a pro tip: if you want someone to review your book, be sure to include \"short\" in the title. Read a short history of a compelling topic in my field? Sign. Me. Up. I didn't, I admit, stop to reflect too closely on what \"short\" might mean in the context of <em>A Brief History of Personality Disorders</em>. It could mean the book is short, or the history is short, or (stretching a grammatical point) the history of personality disorders is itself, relative to history as a whole, short. Spoiler alert: it's not the first one. The book itself isn't, on the scale of academic-trade writing, particularly short, at 227 pages. What \"short\" means here is more like synthetic, or sweeping, or broad: this is an overview not just of personality disorders, but personality as a whole, and, indeed, disorders as a (culturally contingent) category. That's a lot to squeeze in; no wonder it isn't actually all that short, and to be honest, I'm glad it's not.</p> <p>The book is in fact a bit breathless: a race (or at least a jog) through a couple of hundred years of history (and a look back to antiquity, as one does) to discuss not just the history of personality disorders, but indeed the history of both personality and disorders. If that means that the actual disorders get … errr … short shrift, it's worth it: as Horwitz compellingly explains, personality disorders are a particularly complicated category both as an entity, and indeed as individual components. As is true for a lot of mental illness, disease models simply do not fit. It's more acute in this case: personality, Horwitz outlines, is deeply shaped by social, political, and historical conditions. That makes it fair game for a variety of disciplines to study and claim, and at the same time, hard to determine norms. It's also really hard to study in traditional tests: with, say, IQ tests, there is an internal motivation to get it right. That's not that different to personality tests, except that \"getting it right\" is itself contingent on what the test-taker believes to be the best outcome. It's a motivated approach based on circumstance: if you want a job (or to get out of a job) you'll frame your answers accordingly. And even in cases where the test is untethered to an outcome, the answers reflect what the test-taker believes to be true about themselves rather than what might actually be the case. Personality is hard to measure, and it's hard to determine where a personality stops and a disorder starts. Unlike the classic medical model, which understands <strong>[End Page 169]</strong> illness and its symptoms to be layered on top of the afflicted individual, the personality, disordered or otherwise, <em>is</em> the individual.</p> <p>Not only is personality as a category and an entity deeply socially and culturally contingent, so too is when it goes \"wrong.\" But, as Horwitz demonstrates, we can't really get to that point until we understand the history of personality itself. The book opens with a long look back to antiquity, and races (quite quickly) to the nineteenth century and the emergence of systemic systems to study the mind. While some of this is a classic history of the mind narrative, Horwitz's focus on personality disorders as the organizing thread brings a new and highly useful perspective to the phrenology to Freud (to <em>DSM</em>s 1–5).</p> <p>As the book moves through the history of personality, it offers a compelling discussion of the history of psychology, from quantitative to psychoanalytic to social to neo-Freudian approaches to the study of the mind and the self. Each of these methods, Horwitz shows in compelling and accessible ways, emerges from and is deeply intertwined with particular historical and cultural events. The book...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":55304,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the History of Medicine","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality Disorders: A Short History of Narcissistic, Borderline, Antisocial, and Other Types by Allan V. Horwitz (review)\",\"authors\":\"Sharrona Pearl\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/bhm.2024.a929788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Personality Disorders: A Short History of Narcissistic, Borderline, Antisocial, and Other Types</em> by Allan V. Horwitz <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Sharrona Pearl </li> </ul> Allan V. Horwitz. <em>Personality Disorders: A Short History of Narcissistic, Borderline, Antisocial, and Other Types</em>. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023. xii + 227 pp. $35.00 (978-1-4214-4610-3). <p>Here's a pro tip: if you want someone to review your book, be sure to include \\\"short\\\" in the title. Read a short history of a compelling topic in my field? Sign. Me. Up. I didn't, I admit, stop to reflect too closely on what \\\"short\\\" might mean in the context of <em>A Brief History of Personality Disorders</em>. It could mean the book is short, or the history is short, or (stretching a grammatical point) the history of personality disorders is itself, relative to history as a whole, short. Spoiler alert: it's not the first one. The book itself isn't, on the scale of academic-trade writing, particularly short, at 227 pages. What \\\"short\\\" means here is more like synthetic, or sweeping, or broad: this is an overview not just of personality disorders, but personality as a whole, and, indeed, disorders as a (culturally contingent) category. That's a lot to squeeze in; no wonder it isn't actually all that short, and to be honest, I'm glad it's not.</p> <p>The book is in fact a bit breathless: a race (or at least a jog) through a couple of hundred years of history (and a look back to antiquity, as one does) to discuss not just the history of personality disorders, but indeed the history of both personality and disorders. If that means that the actual disorders get … errr … short shrift, it's worth it: as Horwitz compellingly explains, personality disorders are a particularly complicated category both as an entity, and indeed as individual components. As is true for a lot of mental illness, disease models simply do not fit. It's more acute in this case: personality, Horwitz outlines, is deeply shaped by social, political, and historical conditions. That makes it fair game for a variety of disciplines to study and claim, and at the same time, hard to determine norms. It's also really hard to study in traditional tests: with, say, IQ tests, there is an internal motivation to get it right. That's not that different to personality tests, except that \\\"getting it right\\\" is itself contingent on what the test-taker believes to be the best outcome. It's a motivated approach based on circumstance: if you want a job (or to get out of a job) you'll frame your answers accordingly. And even in cases where the test is untethered to an outcome, the answers reflect what the test-taker believes to be true about themselves rather than what might actually be the case. Personality is hard to measure, and it's hard to determine where a personality stops and a disorder starts. Unlike the classic medical model, which understands <strong>[End Page 169]</strong> illness and its symptoms to be layered on top of the afflicted individual, the personality, disordered or otherwise, <em>is</em> the individual.</p> <p>Not only is personality as a category and an entity deeply socially and culturally contingent, so too is when it goes \\\"wrong.\\\" But, as Horwitz demonstrates, we can't really get to that point until we understand the history of personality itself. The book opens with a long look back to antiquity, and races (quite quickly) to the nineteenth century and the emergence of systemic systems to study the mind. While some of this is a classic history of the mind narrative, Horwitz's focus on personality disorders as the organizing thread brings a new and highly useful perspective to the phrenology to Freud (to <em>DSM</em>s 1–5).</p> <p>As the book moves through the history of personality, it offers a compelling discussion of the history of psychology, from quantitative to psychoanalytic to social to neo-Freudian approaches to the study of the mind and the self. Each of these methods, Horwitz shows in compelling and accessible ways, emerges from and is deeply intertwined with particular historical and cultural events. The book...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the History of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the History of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2024.a929788\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the History of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2024.a929788","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
评论者: 人格障碍:自恋型、边缘型、反社会型及其他类型的简史》,作者 Allan V. Horwitz Sharrona Pearl Allan V. Horwitz。人格障碍:自恋型、边缘型、反社会型及其他类型简史》。巴尔的摩:约翰-霍普金斯大学出版社,2023 年。xii + 227 pp.$35.00 (978-1-4214-4610-3).这里有一个专业建议:如果你想让别人评论你的书,一定要在书名中加上 "短篇"。阅读我的领域中一个引人注目的主题的简短历史?签名。我。了。我承认,我没有停下来仔细思考 "简短 "在《人格障碍简史》中的含义。它可能意味着这本书很短,也可能意味着这段历史很短,或者(从语法的角度来说)人格障碍的历史本身相对于整个历史来说就很短。剧透警告:这不是第一个。就学术著作而言,这本书本身并不算特别短,只有 227 页。在这里,"短 "的意思更像是综合、概括或宽泛:这不仅是对人格障碍的概述,也是对整个人格的概述,甚至是将人格障碍作为一个(因文化而异)类别的概述。要挤出这么多内容,难怪这本书实际上并不那么短,而且说实话,我很高兴它并不那么短。事实上,这本书有点让人喘不过气来:在几百年的历史长河中奔跑(或至少是慢跑)(也可以回顾一下古代),不仅讨论了人格障碍的历史,还讨论了人格和障碍的历史。如果这意味着真正的人格障碍会被......呃......冷落,那也是值得的:正如霍维茨令人信服地解释的那样,人格障碍是一个特别复杂的类别,无论是作为一个实体,还是作为单独的组成部分。就像很多精神疾病一样,疾病模式并不适合。霍维茨概述说,人格深受社会、政治和历史条件的影响。这使它成为各种学科研究和主张的公平游戏,同时也很难确定规范。传统的测试也很难对其进行研究:比如智商测试,有一个内在的动机就是要把它做对。这与人格测试并无太大区别,只是 "做对 "本身取决于测试者认为什么是最好的结果。这是一种基于环境的动机方法:如果你想要一份工作(或想摆脱一份工作),你就会据此来确定你的答案。即使在测试与结果无关的情况下,答案也反映了应试者认为自己的真实情况,而不是实际情况。人格很难测量,也很难确定人格在哪里停止,失调在哪里开始。经典的医学模式将疾病及其症状理解为被折磨的个体之上的一层,与之不同的是,人格,无论是否失调,都是个体。人格作为一个类别和实体,不仅在社会和文化上具有深刻的偶然性,在人格 "出错 "时也是如此。但是,正如霍维茨所展示的,只有了解了人格本身的历史,我们才能真正理解这一点。本书以对古代的回顾开篇,然后(以相当快的速度)进入十九世纪,出现了研究心灵的系统体系。虽然这其中有一些是经典的心灵史叙事,但霍维茨将重点放在人格障碍上,将其作为组织主线,为从弗洛伊德(到 DSM 1-5)的膈轮学带来了一个全新且非常有用的视角。本书在讲述人格史的同时,还对心理学史进行了引人入胜的讨论,从定量方法到精神分析方法,从社会方法到新弗洛伊德方法,对心灵和自我进行了研究。霍维茨以引人入胜、通俗易懂的方式展示了这些方法中的每一种,它们都源于特定的历史和文化事件,并与之深深交织在一起。本书...
Personality Disorders: A Short History of Narcissistic, Borderline, Antisocial, and Other Types by Allan V. Horwitz (review)
Reviewed by:
Personality Disorders: A Short History of Narcissistic, Borderline, Antisocial, and Other Types by Allan V. Horwitz
Sharrona Pearl
Allan V. Horwitz. Personality Disorders: A Short History of Narcissistic, Borderline, Antisocial, and Other Types. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023. xii + 227 pp. $35.00 (978-1-4214-4610-3).
Here's a pro tip: if you want someone to review your book, be sure to include "short" in the title. Read a short history of a compelling topic in my field? Sign. Me. Up. I didn't, I admit, stop to reflect too closely on what "short" might mean in the context of A Brief History of Personality Disorders. It could mean the book is short, or the history is short, or (stretching a grammatical point) the history of personality disorders is itself, relative to history as a whole, short. Spoiler alert: it's not the first one. The book itself isn't, on the scale of academic-trade writing, particularly short, at 227 pages. What "short" means here is more like synthetic, or sweeping, or broad: this is an overview not just of personality disorders, but personality as a whole, and, indeed, disorders as a (culturally contingent) category. That's a lot to squeeze in; no wonder it isn't actually all that short, and to be honest, I'm glad it's not.
The book is in fact a bit breathless: a race (or at least a jog) through a couple of hundred years of history (and a look back to antiquity, as one does) to discuss not just the history of personality disorders, but indeed the history of both personality and disorders. If that means that the actual disorders get … errr … short shrift, it's worth it: as Horwitz compellingly explains, personality disorders are a particularly complicated category both as an entity, and indeed as individual components. As is true for a lot of mental illness, disease models simply do not fit. It's more acute in this case: personality, Horwitz outlines, is deeply shaped by social, political, and historical conditions. That makes it fair game for a variety of disciplines to study and claim, and at the same time, hard to determine norms. It's also really hard to study in traditional tests: with, say, IQ tests, there is an internal motivation to get it right. That's not that different to personality tests, except that "getting it right" is itself contingent on what the test-taker believes to be the best outcome. It's a motivated approach based on circumstance: if you want a job (or to get out of a job) you'll frame your answers accordingly. And even in cases where the test is untethered to an outcome, the answers reflect what the test-taker believes to be true about themselves rather than what might actually be the case. Personality is hard to measure, and it's hard to determine where a personality stops and a disorder starts. Unlike the classic medical model, which understands [End Page 169] illness and its symptoms to be layered on top of the afflicted individual, the personality, disordered or otherwise, is the individual.
Not only is personality as a category and an entity deeply socially and culturally contingent, so too is when it goes "wrong." But, as Horwitz demonstrates, we can't really get to that point until we understand the history of personality itself. The book opens with a long look back to antiquity, and races (quite quickly) to the nineteenth century and the emergence of systemic systems to study the mind. While some of this is a classic history of the mind narrative, Horwitz's focus on personality disorders as the organizing thread brings a new and highly useful perspective to the phrenology to Freud (to DSMs 1–5).
As the book moves through the history of personality, it offers a compelling discussion of the history of psychology, from quantitative to psychoanalytic to social to neo-Freudian approaches to the study of the mind and the self. Each of these methods, Horwitz shows in compelling and accessible ways, emerges from and is deeply intertwined with particular historical and cultural events. The book...
期刊介绍:
A leading journal in its field for more than three quarters of a century, the Bulletin spans the social, cultural, and scientific aspects of the history of medicine worldwide. Every issue includes reviews of recent books on medical history. Recurring sections include Digital Humanities & Public History and Pedagogy. Bulletin of the History of Medicine is the official publication of the American Association for the History of Medicine (AAHM) and the Johns Hopkins Institute of the History of Medicine.