妇女健康与宣言 (WHAM):英国 2024 年大选,快速选民信息研究

Edward Mullins, Kate Womersely, Fardowsa Abdi, Celestine Donovan-Bradley, Christine Ekechi, Leah Hazard, Jane Hirst, Melanie Nana, Alison Perry, Ana-Catarina Pinho-Gomes, Katherine Ripullone, Stephanie Williams
{"title":"妇女健康与宣言 (WHAM):英国 2024 年大选,快速选民信息研究","authors":"Edward Mullins, Kate Womersely, Fardowsa Abdi, Celestine Donovan-Bradley, Christine Ekechi, Leah Hazard, Jane Hirst, Melanie Nana, Alison Perry, Ana-Catarina Pinho-Gomes, Katherine Ripullone, Stephanie Williams","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.30.24309732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nThe UK 2024 general election manifestos publicly set out the political parties priorities for the eventuality that they are voted into government. We determined to evaluate whether already agreed, evidenced and promoted issues affecting womens health in the UK had been included in the major parties manifestos. Methods\nWe curated a longlist of priorities and recommendations drawn from major womens health reports, white papers, national inquiries and health strategies published in the UK over the last 10 years which are publicly available and invited our public contributors to suggest additional topics. We selected the shortlist of womens health-related priorities - our top 15 asks - using a Delphi process. We then devised a scoring system whereby manifestos were marked against the 15 priorities with a maximum of 2 points for each priority. We tested inter-rater reliability on the 2019 Manifesto.\nResults\nOverall, the limited inclusion of prominent issues for womens health in party manifestos was disappointing across the board. There was little difference between most major parties coverage of womens health in their manifestos. All were limited. Most parties addressed two issues well: childcare and women returning to work after pregnancy; and violence against women and girls and the prosecution of perpetrators. Several other issues, including assurance that all policy is built in consultation with women; decriminalisation and access to abortion; and womens health hubs for reproductive, menopause and lifelong health, were considered by none or only one of the major parties. Discussion\nWomens health remains a fringe issue in UK politics, despite the efforts of patients, advocates and healthcare professionals to highlight the suffering that many women live with every day, and at particularly vulnerable and high risk periods of their life such as in pregnancy and the postpartum. Our analysis highlights the importance of developing previous efforts in womens health to strengthen existing infrastructure, collaboration and innovation. The next government should build on the work in progress, such as delivering the Womens Health Strategy (2022) rather than starting afresh.","PeriodicalId":501386,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Policy","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Womens Health And Manifestos (WHAM): UK General Election 2024, a rapid voter information study\",\"authors\":\"Edward Mullins, Kate Womersely, Fardowsa Abdi, Celestine Donovan-Bradley, Christine Ekechi, Leah Hazard, Jane Hirst, Melanie Nana, Alison Perry, Ana-Catarina Pinho-Gomes, Katherine Ripullone, Stephanie Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.06.30.24309732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nThe UK 2024 general election manifestos publicly set out the political parties priorities for the eventuality that they are voted into government. We determined to evaluate whether already agreed, evidenced and promoted issues affecting womens health in the UK had been included in the major parties manifestos. Methods\\nWe curated a longlist of priorities and recommendations drawn from major womens health reports, white papers, national inquiries and health strategies published in the UK over the last 10 years which are publicly available and invited our public contributors to suggest additional topics. We selected the shortlist of womens health-related priorities - our top 15 asks - using a Delphi process. We then devised a scoring system whereby manifestos were marked against the 15 priorities with a maximum of 2 points for each priority. We tested inter-rater reliability on the 2019 Manifesto.\\nResults\\nOverall, the limited inclusion of prominent issues for womens health in party manifestos was disappointing across the board. There was little difference between most major parties coverage of womens health in their manifestos. All were limited. Most parties addressed two issues well: childcare and women returning to work after pregnancy; and violence against women and girls and the prosecution of perpetrators. Several other issues, including assurance that all policy is built in consultation with women; decriminalisation and access to abortion; and womens health hubs for reproductive, menopause and lifelong health, were considered by none or only one of the major parties. Discussion\\nWomens health remains a fringe issue in UK politics, despite the efforts of patients, advocates and healthcare professionals to highlight the suffering that many women live with every day, and at particularly vulnerable and high risk periods of their life such as in pregnancy and the postpartum. Our analysis highlights the importance of developing previous efforts in womens health to strengthen existing infrastructure, collaboration and innovation. The next government should build on the work in progress, such as delivering the Womens Health Strategy (2022) rather than starting afresh.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.30.24309732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.30.24309732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景英国 2024 年大选宣言公开列出了各政党在当选政府后的优先事项。我们决定评估各主要政党的宣言中是否包含了已达成共识、经过论证和推广的影响英国妇女健康的问题。方法我们从过去 10 年英国公开发表的主要妇女健康报告、白皮书、国家调查和健康战略中整理出一份优先事项和建议清单,并邀请公众投稿人提出其他议题。我们采用德尔菲法(Delphi process)选出了与妇女健康相关的优先事项短名单,即我们的 15 大要求。然后,我们设计了一套评分系统,根据这 15 个优先事项对宣言进行评分,每个优先事项最多得 2 分。我们对 2019 年的宣言进行了评分者间可靠性测试。结果总体而言,各政党在宣言中对妇女健康问题的重视程度有限,这一点令人失望。大多数主要政党在宣言中对妇女健康问题的报道差别不大。都很有限。大多数政党都很好地处理了两个问题:儿童保育和妇女怀孕后重返工作岗位;暴力侵害妇女和女童行为及起诉犯罪者。其他几个问题,包括保证所有政策的制定都与妇女协商;堕胎非刑罪化和获得堕胎的机会;以及生殖、更年期和终生健康方面的妇女健康中心,没有一个主要政党或只有一个主要政党考虑了这些问题。讨论尽管患者、倡导者和医疗保健专业人员努力强调许多妇女每天都在遭受痛苦,以及在其生命中特别脆弱和高风险的时期,如怀孕和产后,但妇女健康仍然是英国政治中的一个边缘问题。我们的分析强调了发展以往妇女健康工作的重要性,以加强现有的基础设施、合作和创新。下一届政府应在现有工作的基础上再接再厉,例如实施妇女健康战略(2022 年),而不是重新开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Womens Health And Manifestos (WHAM): UK General Election 2024, a rapid voter information study
Background The UK 2024 general election manifestos publicly set out the political parties priorities for the eventuality that they are voted into government. We determined to evaluate whether already agreed, evidenced and promoted issues affecting womens health in the UK had been included in the major parties manifestos. Methods We curated a longlist of priorities and recommendations drawn from major womens health reports, white papers, national inquiries and health strategies published in the UK over the last 10 years which are publicly available and invited our public contributors to suggest additional topics. We selected the shortlist of womens health-related priorities - our top 15 asks - using a Delphi process. We then devised a scoring system whereby manifestos were marked against the 15 priorities with a maximum of 2 points for each priority. We tested inter-rater reliability on the 2019 Manifesto. Results Overall, the limited inclusion of prominent issues for womens health in party manifestos was disappointing across the board. There was little difference between most major parties coverage of womens health in their manifestos. All were limited. Most parties addressed two issues well: childcare and women returning to work after pregnancy; and violence against women and girls and the prosecution of perpetrators. Several other issues, including assurance that all policy is built in consultation with women; decriminalisation and access to abortion; and womens health hubs for reproductive, menopause and lifelong health, were considered by none or only one of the major parties. Discussion Womens health remains a fringe issue in UK politics, despite the efforts of patients, advocates and healthcare professionals to highlight the suffering that many women live with every day, and at particularly vulnerable and high risk periods of their life such as in pregnancy and the postpartum. Our analysis highlights the importance of developing previous efforts in womens health to strengthen existing infrastructure, collaboration and innovation. The next government should build on the work in progress, such as delivering the Womens Health Strategy (2022) rather than starting afresh.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"WE CAN ALL CONTRIBUTE IN OUR OWN WAY" : KNOWLEDGE MOBILIZATION TOOLS TO PROMOTE BEST PRACTICES IN UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBILITY Geospatial Analysis of the Association between Medicaid Ex-pansion, Minimum Wage Policies, and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia Prevalence in the United States The clinical and cost-effectiveness of interventions for preventing continence issues resulting from birth trauma: a rapid review Supporting women, girls and people who menstruate to participate in physical activity - Rapid evidence summary Performance of the Washington Group Questions in Measuring Blindness and Deafness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1