关于欧洲原子能共同体 1 毫米台阶测微计测量补充比对的报告

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Metrologia Pub Date : 2024-06-23 DOI:10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/04003
M Matus, M del Mar Pérez, E Prieto, A Germak, D Czułek, P Sosinowski, A Duță, E Dugheanu, S Zelenika, M Äremann, B Ozgur, M Asar, P Greeff, K Manana, S Sun, J Buajarern, D A Brasil, B Gastaldi and G Zechner
{"title":"关于欧洲原子能共同体 1 毫米台阶测微计测量补充比对的报告","authors":"M Matus, M del Mar Pérez, E Prieto, A Germak, D Czułek, P Sosinowski, A Duță, E Dugheanu, S Zelenika, M Äremann, B Ozgur, M Asar, P Greeff, K Manana, S Sun, J Buajarern, D A Brasil, B Gastaldi and G Zechner","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/04003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of the EURAMET supplementary comparison on the calibration of a 1 mm stage micrometer are reported. 13 NMIs from 4 RMOs participated in the comparison. Originally, the comparison was planned to use a single artefact. Because it was destroyed during the duration of the comparison, it was necessary to carry out the test in two loops using a new artefact. Artefact circulation started in August 2020 and was completed in September 2022. Both artefacts were the same make and kind. The two artefacts are standard stage micrometers as used in optical microscopy on a transparent, low thermal expansion substrate. The scale length is 1 mm divided in 100 parts. The distances of all 100 scale marks from the zero mark have been measured by each participant. The results with associated uncertainties of all participating NMIs were in good agreement. All En values were smaller than 1 already from the pre-draft A state on. Therefore, no separate analysis of a largest consistent subset was necessary. With 1400 values without a single outlier, it is tempting to assume that uncertainty contributions are somehow overestimated. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCL, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Report on EURAMET supplementary comparison on measurement of a 1 mm stage micrometer\",\"authors\":\"M Matus, M del Mar Pérez, E Prieto, A Germak, D Czułek, P Sosinowski, A Duță, E Dugheanu, S Zelenika, M Äremann, B Ozgur, M Asar, P Greeff, K Manana, S Sun, J Buajarern, D A Brasil, B Gastaldi and G Zechner\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/04003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The results of the EURAMET supplementary comparison on the calibration of a 1 mm stage micrometer are reported. 13 NMIs from 4 RMOs participated in the comparison. Originally, the comparison was planned to use a single artefact. Because it was destroyed during the duration of the comparison, it was necessary to carry out the test in two loops using a new artefact. Artefact circulation started in August 2020 and was completed in September 2022. Both artefacts were the same make and kind. The two artefacts are standard stage micrometers as used in optical microscopy on a transparent, low thermal expansion substrate. The scale length is 1 mm divided in 100 parts. The distances of all 100 scale marks from the zero mark have been measured by each participant. The results with associated uncertainties of all participating NMIs were in good agreement. All En values were smaller than 1 already from the pre-draft A state on. Therefore, no separate analysis of a largest consistent subset was necessary. With 1400 values without a single outlier, it is tempting to assume that uncertainty contributions are somehow overestimated. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCL, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).\",\"PeriodicalId\":18444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metrologia\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metrologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/04003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metrologia","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/04003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

报告了欧洲原子能共同体 1 毫米台阶测微计校准补充比对的结果。来自 4 个 RMO 的 13 个 NMI 参加了比对。比对最初计划使用一个人工制品。由于该工件在比对期间被毁坏,因此有必要使用一个新工件分两个循环进行测试。人工制品循环于 2020 年 8 月开始,2022 年 9 月完成。两个人工制品的型号和种类相同。这两个人工制品是光学显微镜中使用的标准平台测微器,安装在透明、热膨胀率低的基底上。刻度长度为 1 毫米,分为 100 份。每位参赛者都测量了所有 100 个刻度线距零点的距离。所有参与 NMI 的结果与相关的不确定性非常一致。从预稿 A 状态开始,所有 En 值都小于 1。因此,无需对最大一致子集进行单独分析。1400 个数值中没有一个离群值,这很容易让人认为不确定性的贡献在某种程度上被高估了。要阅读本文正文,请点击最终报告。请注意,此文本是 BIPM 关键比对数据库 https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ 附录 B 中的文本。根据 CIPM 互认安排 (CIPM MRA) 的规定,最终报告已通过同行评审,并批准由 CCL 出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Report on EURAMET supplementary comparison on measurement of a 1 mm stage micrometer
The results of the EURAMET supplementary comparison on the calibration of a 1 mm stage micrometer are reported. 13 NMIs from 4 RMOs participated in the comparison. Originally, the comparison was planned to use a single artefact. Because it was destroyed during the duration of the comparison, it was necessary to carry out the test in two loops using a new artefact. Artefact circulation started in August 2020 and was completed in September 2022. Both artefacts were the same make and kind. The two artefacts are standard stage micrometers as used in optical microscopy on a transparent, low thermal expansion substrate. The scale length is 1 mm divided in 100 parts. The distances of all 100 scale marks from the zero mark have been measured by each participant. The results with associated uncertainties of all participating NMIs were in good agreement. All En values were smaller than 1 already from the pre-draft A state on. Therefore, no separate analysis of a largest consistent subset was necessary. With 1400 values without a single outlier, it is tempting to assume that uncertainty contributions are somehow overestimated. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCL, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Metrologia
Metrologia 工程技术-物理:应用
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published 6 times per year, Metrologia covers the fundamentals of measurements, particularly those dealing with the seven base units of the International System of Units (metre, kilogram, second, ampere, kelvin, candela, mole) or proposals to replace them. The journal also publishes papers that contribute to the solution of difficult measurement problems and improve the accuracy of derived units and constants that are of fundamental importance to physics. In addition to regular papers, the journal publishes review articles, issues devoted to single topics of timely interest and occasional conference proceedings. Letters to the Editor and Short Communications (generally three pages or less) are also considered.
期刊最新文献
Conversion of a piston-cylinder dimensional dataset to the effective area of a mechanical pressure generator. Evaluating the structural and predictive validity of a derivational morphology task with struggling adult readers. A robust time scale for space applications using the student’s t-distribution A digital four-arm bridge for the comparison of resistance with capacitance Traceable characterisation of fibre-coupled single-photon detectors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1