土壤水分制度对长期施肥水稻土壤中温室气体排放、土壤微生物生物量和酶活性的影响

IF 6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Sciences Europe Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1186/s12302-024-00943-4
Asad Shah, Jing Huang, Tianfu Han, Muhammad Numan Khan, Kiya Adare Tadesse, Nano Alemu Daba, Sajeela Khan, Sami Ullah, Muhammad Fahad Sardar, Shah Fahad, Huimin Zhang
{"title":"土壤水分制度对长期施肥水稻土壤中温室气体排放、土壤微生物生物量和酶活性的影响","authors":"Asad Shah, Jing Huang, Tianfu Han, Muhammad Numan Khan, Kiya Adare Tadesse, Nano Alemu Daba, Sajeela Khan, Sami Ullah, Muhammad Fahad Sardar, Shah Fahad, Huimin Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12302-024-00943-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two potent greenhouse gases that are mostly found in agricultural soils are methane and nitrous oxide. Therefore, we investigated the effect of different moisture regimes on microbial stoichiometry, enzymatic activity, and greenhouse gas emissions in long-term paddy soils. The treatments included a control (CK; no addition), chemical fertilizer (NPK), and NPK + cattle manure (NPKM) and two moisture regimes such as 60% water-filled pore spaces (WFPS) and flooding. The results revealed that 60% water-filled pore spaces (WFPS) emit higher amounts of N<sub>2</sub>O than flooded soil, while in the case of CH<sub>4</sub> the flooded soil emits more CH<sub>4</sub> emission compared to 60% WFPS. At 60% WFPS higher N<sub>2</sub>O flux values were recorded for control, NPK, and NPKM which are 2.3, 3.1, and 3.5 µg kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. In flooded soil, the CH<sub>4</sub> flux emission was higher, and the NPKM treatment recorded the maximum CH<sub>4</sub> emissions (3.8 µg kg<sup>−1</sup>) followed by NPK (3.2 µg kg<sup>−1</sup>) and CK (1.7 µg kg<sup>−1</sup>). The dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was increased by 15–27% under all flooded treatments as compared to 60% WPFS treatments. The microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus (MBC, MBN, and MBP) significantly increased in the flooded treatments by 8–12%, 14–21%, and 4–22%, respectively when compared to 60% WFPS. The urease enzyme was influenced by moisture conditions, and significantly increased by 42–54% in flooded soil compared with 60% WFPS while having little effect on the β-glucosidase (BG) and acid phosphatase (AcP) enzymes. Moreover DOC, MBC, and pH showed a significant positive relationship with cumulative CH<sub>4</sub>, while DOC showed a significant relationship with cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O. In the random forest model, soil moisture, MBC, DOC, pH, and enzymatic activities were the most important factors for GHG emissions. The PLS-PM analysis showed that soil properties and enzymes possessed significantly directly impacted on CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, while SMB had indirect positive effect on CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"2013 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of soil moisture regimes on greenhouse gas emissions, soil microbial biomass, and enzymatic activity in long-term fertilized paddy soil\",\"authors\":\"Asad Shah, Jing Huang, Tianfu Han, Muhammad Numan Khan, Kiya Adare Tadesse, Nano Alemu Daba, Sajeela Khan, Sami Ullah, Muhammad Fahad Sardar, Shah Fahad, Huimin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12302-024-00943-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Two potent greenhouse gases that are mostly found in agricultural soils are methane and nitrous oxide. Therefore, we investigated the effect of different moisture regimes on microbial stoichiometry, enzymatic activity, and greenhouse gas emissions in long-term paddy soils. The treatments included a control (CK; no addition), chemical fertilizer (NPK), and NPK + cattle manure (NPKM) and two moisture regimes such as 60% water-filled pore spaces (WFPS) and flooding. The results revealed that 60% water-filled pore spaces (WFPS) emit higher amounts of N<sub>2</sub>O than flooded soil, while in the case of CH<sub>4</sub> the flooded soil emits more CH<sub>4</sub> emission compared to 60% WFPS. At 60% WFPS higher N<sub>2</sub>O flux values were recorded for control, NPK, and NPKM which are 2.3, 3.1, and 3.5 µg kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. In flooded soil, the CH<sub>4</sub> flux emission was higher, and the NPKM treatment recorded the maximum CH<sub>4</sub> emissions (3.8 µg kg<sup>−1</sup>) followed by NPK (3.2 µg kg<sup>−1</sup>) and CK (1.7 µg kg<sup>−1</sup>). The dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was increased by 15–27% under all flooded treatments as compared to 60% WPFS treatments. The microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus (MBC, MBN, and MBP) significantly increased in the flooded treatments by 8–12%, 14–21%, and 4–22%, respectively when compared to 60% WFPS. The urease enzyme was influenced by moisture conditions, and significantly increased by 42–54% in flooded soil compared with 60% WFPS while having little effect on the β-glucosidase (BG) and acid phosphatase (AcP) enzymes. Moreover DOC, MBC, and pH showed a significant positive relationship with cumulative CH<sub>4</sub>, while DOC showed a significant relationship with cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O. In the random forest model, soil moisture, MBC, DOC, pH, and enzymatic activities were the most important factors for GHG emissions. The PLS-PM analysis showed that soil properties and enzymes possessed significantly directly impacted on CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, while SMB had indirect positive effect on CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Sciences Europe\",\"volume\":\"2013 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Sciences Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-024-00943-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-024-00943-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业土壤中主要存在甲烷和氧化亚氮这两种强效温室气体。因此,我们研究了不同水分制度对长期稻田土壤中微生物的化学计量、酶活性和温室气体排放的影响。处理包括对照(CK;无添加)、化肥(NPK)和 NPK + 牛粪(NPKM),以及 60% 水填充孔隙(WFPS)和淹水等两种湿度制度。结果表明,60% 水填充孔隙(WFPS)比淹没土壤排放更多的 N2O,而在 CH4 排放方面,淹没土壤比 60% 水填充孔隙排放更多的 CH4。在 60% WFPS 条件下,对照、NPK 和 NPKM 的 N2O 通量值较高,分别为 2.3、3.1 和 3.5 µg kg-1。在淹水土壤中,CH4 通量排放量较高,NPKM 处理的 CH4 排放量最大(3.8 µg kg-1),其次是 NPK(3.2 µg kg-1)和 CK(1.7 µg kg-1)。与 60% WPFS 处理相比,所有淹没处理的溶解有机碳(DOC)增加了 15-27%。与 60% WFPS 相比,淹没处理的微生物生物量碳、氮和磷(MBC、MBN 和 MBP)分别显著增加了 8-12%、14-21% 和 4-22%。脲酶受水分条件的影响,与 60% WFPS 相比,淹水土壤中的脲酶显著增加了 42-54%,而对β-葡萄糖苷酶(BG)和酸性磷酸酶(AcP)影响不大。此外,DOC、MBC 和 pH 与累积 CH4 呈显著正相关,而 DOC 与累积 N2O 呈显著相关。在随机森林模型中,土壤水分、MBC、DOC、pH 和酶活性是影响温室气体排放的最重要因素。PLS-PM 分析表明,土壤特性和酶活性对 CH4 和 N2O 的排放有显著的直接影响,而 SMB 对 CH4 和 N2O 的排放有间接的正向影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of soil moisture regimes on greenhouse gas emissions, soil microbial biomass, and enzymatic activity in long-term fertilized paddy soil

Two potent greenhouse gases that are mostly found in agricultural soils are methane and nitrous oxide. Therefore, we investigated the effect of different moisture regimes on microbial stoichiometry, enzymatic activity, and greenhouse gas emissions in long-term paddy soils. The treatments included a control (CK; no addition), chemical fertilizer (NPK), and NPK + cattle manure (NPKM) and two moisture regimes such as 60% water-filled pore spaces (WFPS) and flooding. The results revealed that 60% water-filled pore spaces (WFPS) emit higher amounts of N2O than flooded soil, while in the case of CH4 the flooded soil emits more CH4 emission compared to 60% WFPS. At 60% WFPS higher N2O flux values were recorded for control, NPK, and NPKM which are 2.3, 3.1, and 3.5 µg kg−1, respectively. In flooded soil, the CH4 flux emission was higher, and the NPKM treatment recorded the maximum CH4 emissions (3.8 µg kg−1) followed by NPK (3.2 µg kg−1) and CK (1.7 µg kg−1). The dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was increased by 15–27% under all flooded treatments as compared to 60% WPFS treatments. The microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus (MBC, MBN, and MBP) significantly increased in the flooded treatments by 8–12%, 14–21%, and 4–22%, respectively when compared to 60% WFPS. The urease enzyme was influenced by moisture conditions, and significantly increased by 42–54% in flooded soil compared with 60% WFPS while having little effect on the β-glucosidase (BG) and acid phosphatase (AcP) enzymes. Moreover DOC, MBC, and pH showed a significant positive relationship with cumulative CH4, while DOC showed a significant relationship with cumulative N2O. In the random forest model, soil moisture, MBC, DOC, pH, and enzymatic activities were the most important factors for GHG emissions. The PLS-PM analysis showed that soil properties and enzymes possessed significantly directly impacted on CH4 and N2O emissions, while SMB had indirect positive effect on CH4 and N2O emissions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Sciences Europe Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation. ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation. ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation. Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues. Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.
期刊最新文献
Calculating the effect of intensive use of urban organic waste on soil concentrations of potentially toxic elements in a peri-urban agriculture context in Norway Disentangling mechanisms by which microplastic films affect plant-soil systems: physical effects of particles can override toxic effects of additives Insights into the role of hexa-bacterial consortium for bioremediation of soil contaminated with chlorantraniliprole Unlocking the potential of data harmonization and FAIRness in chemical risk assessment: lessons from practice and insights for policy development Heavy metal contamination and potential health risks in upland rice-producing soils of rotational shifting cultivation in northern Thailand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1