设计中的道德参与:解读设计方法伦理层面的五个考虑因素

IF 0.4 2区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE DESIGN ISSUES Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1162/desi_a_00774
Deger Ozkaramanli;Michael Nagenborg
{"title":"设计中的道德参与:解读设计方法伦理层面的五个考虑因素","authors":"Deger Ozkaramanli;Michael Nagenborg","doi":"10.1162/desi_a_00774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What society experiences today as morally questionable design—from gendered toys for children to public benches that prevent sleeping—can be considered the aftermath of an underdeveloped foundation for systematic ethical reflection in design methodologies. Although designing is an inherently moral activity, research on how to recognize and handle ethical questions and moral dilemmas in early (conceptual) design activities is scarce. In this article, we use an interdisciplinary lens to analyze and respond to the challenges of bridging moral psychology, ethics of technology, and design methodologies. For this, we introduce the concept of moral engagement in design, which is inspired by Moral Disengagement Theory. Finally, we propose five preliminary considerations for enacting moral engagement in design practices. These considerations form an interdisciplinary bridge to help us reflect on the moral dimensions of methodological choices in conceptual design practices.","PeriodicalId":51560,"journal":{"name":"DESIGN ISSUES","volume":"40 3","pages":"37-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral Engagement in Design: Five Considerations for Unpacking the Ethical Dimensions of Design Methods\",\"authors\":\"Deger Ozkaramanli;Michael Nagenborg\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/desi_a_00774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What society experiences today as morally questionable design—from gendered toys for children to public benches that prevent sleeping—can be considered the aftermath of an underdeveloped foundation for systematic ethical reflection in design methodologies. Although designing is an inherently moral activity, research on how to recognize and handle ethical questions and moral dilemmas in early (conceptual) design activities is scarce. In this article, we use an interdisciplinary lens to analyze and respond to the challenges of bridging moral psychology, ethics of technology, and design methodologies. For this, we introduce the concept of moral engagement in design, which is inspired by Moral Disengagement Theory. Finally, we propose five preliminary considerations for enacting moral engagement in design practices. These considerations form an interdisciplinary bridge to help us reflect on the moral dimensions of methodological choices in conceptual design practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DESIGN ISSUES\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"37-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DESIGN ISSUES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10680945/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DESIGN ISSUES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10680945/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当今社会所经历的道德上有问题的设计--从有性别区分的儿童玩具到妨碍睡眠的公共长椅--可以被认为是设计方法中系统的道德反思基础发展不足的后果。尽管设计本质上是一种道德活动,但关于如何在早期(概念性)设计活动中认识和处理道德问题和道德困境的研究却很少。在本文中,我们将从跨学科的角度来分析和应对在道德心理学、技术伦理学和设计方法论之间架起桥梁所面临的挑战。为此,我们引入了设计中的道德参与概念,这一概念受到了道德脱离理论(Moral Disengagement Theory)的启发。最后,我们提出了在设计实践中实施道德参与的五个初步考虑因素。这些考虑因素构成了一座跨学科的桥梁,帮助我们反思概念设计实践中方法选择的道德维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moral Engagement in Design: Five Considerations for Unpacking the Ethical Dimensions of Design Methods
What society experiences today as morally questionable design—from gendered toys for children to public benches that prevent sleeping—can be considered the aftermath of an underdeveloped foundation for systematic ethical reflection in design methodologies. Although designing is an inherently moral activity, research on how to recognize and handle ethical questions and moral dilemmas in early (conceptual) design activities is scarce. In this article, we use an interdisciplinary lens to analyze and respond to the challenges of bridging moral psychology, ethics of technology, and design methodologies. For this, we introduce the concept of moral engagement in design, which is inspired by Moral Disengagement Theory. Finally, we propose five preliminary considerations for enacting moral engagement in design practices. These considerations form an interdisciplinary bridge to help us reflect on the moral dimensions of methodological choices in conceptual design practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DESIGN ISSUES
DESIGN ISSUES ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The first American academic journal to examine design history, theory, and criticism, Design Issues provokes inquiry into the cultural and intellectual issues surrounding design. Regular features include theoretical and critical articles by professional and scholarly contributors, extensive book reviews, and illustrations. Special guest-edited issues concentrate on particular themes, such as artificial intelligence, product seminars, design in Asia, and design education. Scholars, students, and professionals in all the design fields are readers of each issue.
期刊最新文献
Introduction The Intersection of Place and Game Design: The Case of Two Classic African Board Games The Disobedience of Design, (vol. Radical Thinkers in Design) Ethnographies of Unimagined Possibilities: Toward a Conversational Paradigm for Human-Centered Design Research Design and Making Things Better: Relating the Pragmatism of John Dewey and Richard McKeon in Design Inquiry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1