共轭放大复杂性:有机化学课程中解决问题策略的比较

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Chemical Education Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00847
Charles T. Cox Jr.*, Reika Shimomura, Jacques T. V. E. Hall and Sean Gao, 
{"title":"共轭放大复杂性:有机化学课程中解决问题策略的比较","authors":"Charles T. Cox Jr.*,&nbsp;Reika Shimomura,&nbsp;Jacques T. V. E. Hall and Sean Gao,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Resonance structures are central representations in organic chemistry that explain trends in acidity, reactivity, geometry, and stability. Despite being a central representation, prior research findings have shown that students’ productive application of resonance as a resource is context-dependent. This research reports findings from a cross-sectional analysis study investigating how Organic Chemistry I (OC1) and Organic Chemistry II (OC2) students use resonance structures to describe acid–base properties, chemical shifts, and geometry. Six students from OC1 and six from OC2 participated in semistructured interviews to capture their problem-solving pathways. Each prompt was designed to be answered using resonance structures. OC1 students, who noted resonance, were less successful with drawing and applying resonance structures than OC2 students, as expected. However, both cohorts used resonance structures to a limited extent, despite the similarities of molecules presented within each prompt. Resources that do not require structural manipulation, such as s-character and electronegativity, were commonly activated instead of resonance across both courses.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conjugation Amplifies Complexity: A Comparison of Problem-Solving Strategies Across the Organic Chemistry Sequence\",\"authors\":\"Charles T. Cox Jr.*,&nbsp;Reika Shimomura,&nbsp;Jacques T. V. E. Hall and Sean Gao,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Resonance structures are central representations in organic chemistry that explain trends in acidity, reactivity, geometry, and stability. Despite being a central representation, prior research findings have shown that students’ productive application of resonance as a resource is context-dependent. This research reports findings from a cross-sectional analysis study investigating how Organic Chemistry I (OC1) and Organic Chemistry II (OC2) students use resonance structures to describe acid–base properties, chemical shifts, and geometry. Six students from OC1 and six from OC2 participated in semistructured interviews to capture their problem-solving pathways. Each prompt was designed to be answered using resonance structures. OC1 students, who noted resonance, were less successful with drawing and applying resonance structures than OC2 students, as expected. However, both cohorts used resonance structures to a limited extent, despite the similarities of molecules presented within each prompt. Resources that do not require structural manipulation, such as s-character and electronegativity, were commonly activated instead of resonance across both courses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00847\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00847","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共振结构是有机化学的核心表征,可解释酸性、反应性、几何形状和稳定性的趋势。尽管共振结构是一种核心表征,但先前的研究结果表明,学生对共振这种资源的生产性应用取决于情境。本研究报告了一项横断面分析研究的结果,该研究调查了有机化学 I(OC1)和有机化学 II(OC2)的学生如何使用共振结构来描述酸碱性质、化学位移和几何形状。来自有机化学一(OC1)和有机化学二(OC2)的六名学生参加了半结构式访谈,以了解他们解决问题的途径。每个提示都设计为使用共振结构进行回答。正如预期的那样,注意到共振的OC1学生在绘制和应用共振结构方面不如OC2学生成功。不过,尽管每个提示中的分子都很相似,但两组学生都在一定程度上使用了共振结构。在两门课程中,不需要结构操作的资源,如 s 字符和电负性,通常被激活而不是共振。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conjugation Amplifies Complexity: A Comparison of Problem-Solving Strategies Across the Organic Chemistry Sequence

Resonance structures are central representations in organic chemistry that explain trends in acidity, reactivity, geometry, and stability. Despite being a central representation, prior research findings have shown that students’ productive application of resonance as a resource is context-dependent. This research reports findings from a cross-sectional analysis study investigating how Organic Chemistry I (OC1) and Organic Chemistry II (OC2) students use resonance structures to describe acid–base properties, chemical shifts, and geometry. Six students from OC1 and six from OC2 participated in semistructured interviews to capture their problem-solving pathways. Each prompt was designed to be answered using resonance structures. OC1 students, who noted resonance, were less successful with drawing and applying resonance structures than OC2 students, as expected. However, both cohorts used resonance structures to a limited extent, despite the similarities of molecules presented within each prompt. Resources that do not require structural manipulation, such as s-character and electronegativity, were commonly activated instead of resonance across both courses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
期刊最新文献
Complementary Instrumental Techniques Applied to Pain Relieving Tablets in an Undergraduate Laboratory Experiment Breaking the Access to Education Barrier: Enhancing HPLC Learning with Virtual Reality Evaluation of the Use of a 360° Immersive Visit of the Organic Chemistry Practical Laboratory for Pharmacy Students Integration of Teaching Laboratory Activities Based on the Valorization of Industrial Waste into Chemical Education to Address the Emerging Sustainable Development Goals Critical Chemical Literacy as a Main Goal of Chemistry Education Aiming for Climate Empowerment and Agency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1