在队列研究中有效收集基于风险的生物样本:设计多癌症检测试验诊断性能的前瞻性研究。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwae139
Mark Louie F Ramos, Anil K Chaturvedi, Barry I Graubard, Hormuzd A Katki
{"title":"在队列研究中有效收集基于风险的生物样本:设计多癌症检测试验诊断性能的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Mark Louie F Ramos, Anil K Chaturvedi, Barry I Graubard, Hormuzd A Katki","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In cohort studies, it can be infeasible to collect specimens on an entire cohort. For example, to estimate sensitivity of multiple multi-cancer detection (MCD) assays, we desire an extra 80 mL of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) blood, but this much extra blood is too expensive for us to collect on everyone. We propose a novel epidemiologic study design that efficiently oversamples those at highest baseline disease risk from whom to collect specimens, to increase the number of future cases with cfDNA blood collection. The variance reduction ratio from our risk-based subsample versus a simple random (sub)sample (SRS) depends primarily on the ratio of risk model sensitivity to the fraction of the cohort selected for specimen collection subject to constraining the risk model specificity. In a simulation where we chose 34% of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Screening Trial cohort at highest risk of lung cancer for cfDNA blood collection, we could enrich the number of lung cancers 2.42-fold. The standard deviation of lung-cancer MCD sensitivity was 31%-33% reduced versus SRS. Risk-based collection of specimens on a subsample of the cohort could be a feasible and efficient approach to collecting extra specimens for molecular epidemiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"243-253"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient risk-based collection of biospecimens in cohort studies: designing a prospective study of diagnostic performance for multicancer detection tests.\",\"authors\":\"Mark Louie F Ramos, Anil K Chaturvedi, Barry I Graubard, Hormuzd A Katki\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aje/kwae139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In cohort studies, it can be infeasible to collect specimens on an entire cohort. For example, to estimate sensitivity of multiple multi-cancer detection (MCD) assays, we desire an extra 80 mL of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) blood, but this much extra blood is too expensive for us to collect on everyone. We propose a novel epidemiologic study design that efficiently oversamples those at highest baseline disease risk from whom to collect specimens, to increase the number of future cases with cfDNA blood collection. The variance reduction ratio from our risk-based subsample versus a simple random (sub)sample (SRS) depends primarily on the ratio of risk model sensitivity to the fraction of the cohort selected for specimen collection subject to constraining the risk model specificity. In a simulation where we chose 34% of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Screening Trial cohort at highest risk of lung cancer for cfDNA blood collection, we could enrich the number of lung cancers 2.42-fold. The standard deviation of lung-cancer MCD sensitivity was 31%-33% reduced versus SRS. Risk-based collection of specimens on a subsample of the cohort could be a feasible and efficient approach to collecting extra specimens for molecular epidemiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"243-253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae139\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae139","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在队列研究中,收集整个队列的标本可能是不可行的。例如,为了估算多种癌症检测(MCD)方法的灵敏度,我们需要额外采集 80 毫升无细胞 DNA(cfDNA)血液,但这么多额外的血液对我们来说太昂贵了,不可能对每个人都采集。我们提出了一种新颖的流行病学研究设计,它能有效地对基线疾病风险最高的人群进行超量采样,以增加未来通过采集 cfDNA 血液获得病例的数量。我们基于风险的子样本与简单随机(子)样本(SRS)的方差缩小率主要取决于风险模型灵敏度与受限于风险模型特异性而被选中采集标本的人群比例。在一项模拟中,我们选择了前列腺、肺、结直肠和卵巢筛查试验队列中 34% 的肺癌高危人群进行 cfDNA 血液采集,与 SRS 相比,我们可以将肺癌的数量增加 2.42 倍,肺癌 MCD 灵敏度的标准偏差降低了 31%-33%。基于风险对队列中的子样本进行标本采集是一种可行且高效的方法,可为分子流行病学收集额外的标本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficient risk-based collection of biospecimens in cohort studies: designing a prospective study of diagnostic performance for multicancer detection tests.

In cohort studies, it can be infeasible to collect specimens on an entire cohort. For example, to estimate sensitivity of multiple multi-cancer detection (MCD) assays, we desire an extra 80 mL of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) blood, but this much extra blood is too expensive for us to collect on everyone. We propose a novel epidemiologic study design that efficiently oversamples those at highest baseline disease risk from whom to collect specimens, to increase the number of future cases with cfDNA blood collection. The variance reduction ratio from our risk-based subsample versus a simple random (sub)sample (SRS) depends primarily on the ratio of risk model sensitivity to the fraction of the cohort selected for specimen collection subject to constraining the risk model specificity. In a simulation where we chose 34% of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Screening Trial cohort at highest risk of lung cancer for cfDNA blood collection, we could enrich the number of lung cancers 2.42-fold. The standard deviation of lung-cancer MCD sensitivity was 31%-33% reduced versus SRS. Risk-based collection of specimens on a subsample of the cohort could be a feasible and efficient approach to collecting extra specimens for molecular epidemiology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Effects of US state paid family leave policies on perinatal and postpartum health: A quasi-experimental analysis. Employment quality and suicide, drug poisoning, and alcohol-attributable mortality. Fast-food and convenience outlets near schools in California: a comparison of private and public schools. Unclean cooking fuel use and sleep problems among adults aged 65 years and older from six countries. Exacerbation of racial disparities in COVID-19 outcomes by Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias among nursing home residents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1