非转基因副流感杆菌菌株 AP-01 食品酶枯草蛋白的安全性评估。

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EFSA Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8873
EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP), Claude Lambré, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Riccardo Crebelli, David Michael Gott, Konrad Grob, Evgenia Lampi, Marcel Mengelers, Alicja Mortensen, Gilles Rivière, Inger-Lise Steffensen, Christina Tlustos, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Holger Zorn, Yrjö Roos, Jaime Aguilera, Magdalena Andryszkiewicz, Daniele Cavanna, Silvia Peluso, Rita Ferreira de Sousa, Francesco Pesce, Yi Liu, Andrew Chesson
{"title":"非转基因副流感杆菌菌株 AP-01 食品酶枯草蛋白的安全性评估。","authors":"EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP),&nbsp;Claude Lambré,&nbsp;José Manuel Barat Baviera,&nbsp;Claudia Bolognesi,&nbsp;Pier Sandro Cocconcelli,&nbsp;Riccardo Crebelli,&nbsp;David Michael Gott,&nbsp;Konrad Grob,&nbsp;Evgenia Lampi,&nbsp;Marcel Mengelers,&nbsp;Alicja Mortensen,&nbsp;Gilles Rivière,&nbsp;Inger-Lise Steffensen,&nbsp;Christina Tlustos,&nbsp;Henk Van Loveren,&nbsp;Laurence Vernis,&nbsp;Holger Zorn,&nbsp;Yrjö Roos,&nbsp;Jaime Aguilera,&nbsp;Magdalena Andryszkiewicz,&nbsp;Daniele Cavanna,&nbsp;Silvia Peluso,&nbsp;Rita Ferreira de Sousa,&nbsp;Francesco Pesce,&nbsp;Yi Liu,&nbsp;Andrew Chesson","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The food enzyme subtilisin (EC 3.4.21.62) is produced with the non-genetically modified <i>Bacillus paralicheniformis</i> strain AP-01 by Nagase (Europa) GmbH. It was considered free from viable cells of the production organism. The food enzyme is intended to be used in five food manufacturing processes. Since residual amounts of food enzyme-total organic solids (TOS) are removed in one process, dietary exposure was calculated only for the remaining four food manufacturing processes. It was estimated to be up to 0.875 mg TOS/kg body weight per day in European populations. The production strain of the food enzyme has the capacity to produce bacitracin and thus failed to meet the requirements of the Qualified Presumption of Safety approach. Bacitracin was detected in the industrial fermentation medium but not in the food enzyme itself. However, the limit of detection of the analytical method used for bacitracin was not sufficient to exclude the possible presence of bacitracin at a level representing a risk for the development of antimicrobial resistant bacteria. A search for the similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and twenty-eight matches with respiratory allergens, one match with a contact allergen and two matches with food allergens (melon and pomegranate) were found. The Panel considered that the risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure to this food enzyme, particularly in individuals sensitised to melon or pomegranate, cannot be excluded, but would not exceed the risk of consuming melon or pomegranate. Based on the data provided, the Panel could not exclude the presence of bacitracin, a medically important antimicrobial, and consequently the safety of this food enzyme could not be established.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety evaluation of the food enzyme subtilisin from the non-genetically modified Bacillus paralicheniformis strain AP-01\",\"authors\":\"EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP),&nbsp;Claude Lambré,&nbsp;José Manuel Barat Baviera,&nbsp;Claudia Bolognesi,&nbsp;Pier Sandro Cocconcelli,&nbsp;Riccardo Crebelli,&nbsp;David Michael Gott,&nbsp;Konrad Grob,&nbsp;Evgenia Lampi,&nbsp;Marcel Mengelers,&nbsp;Alicja Mortensen,&nbsp;Gilles Rivière,&nbsp;Inger-Lise Steffensen,&nbsp;Christina Tlustos,&nbsp;Henk Van Loveren,&nbsp;Laurence Vernis,&nbsp;Holger Zorn,&nbsp;Yrjö Roos,&nbsp;Jaime Aguilera,&nbsp;Magdalena Andryszkiewicz,&nbsp;Daniele Cavanna,&nbsp;Silvia Peluso,&nbsp;Rita Ferreira de Sousa,&nbsp;Francesco Pesce,&nbsp;Yi Liu,&nbsp;Andrew Chesson\",\"doi\":\"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The food enzyme subtilisin (EC 3.4.21.62) is produced with the non-genetically modified <i>Bacillus paralicheniformis</i> strain AP-01 by Nagase (Europa) GmbH. It was considered free from viable cells of the production organism. The food enzyme is intended to be used in five food manufacturing processes. Since residual amounts of food enzyme-total organic solids (TOS) are removed in one process, dietary exposure was calculated only for the remaining four food manufacturing processes. It was estimated to be up to 0.875 mg TOS/kg body weight per day in European populations. The production strain of the food enzyme has the capacity to produce bacitracin and thus failed to meet the requirements of the Qualified Presumption of Safety approach. Bacitracin was detected in the industrial fermentation medium but not in the food enzyme itself. However, the limit of detection of the analytical method used for bacitracin was not sufficient to exclude the possible presence of bacitracin at a level representing a risk for the development of antimicrobial resistant bacteria. A search for the similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and twenty-eight matches with respiratory allergens, one match with a contact allergen and two matches with food allergens (melon and pomegranate) were found. The Panel considered that the risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure to this food enzyme, particularly in individuals sensitised to melon or pomegranate, cannot be excluded, but would not exceed the risk of consuming melon or pomegranate. Based on the data provided, the Panel could not exclude the presence of bacitracin, a medically important antimicrobial, and consequently the safety of this food enzyme could not be established.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222870/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8873\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8873","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

食品用酶枯草芽孢杆菌素(EC 3.4.21.62)是由 Nagase (Europa) GmbH 公司用非转基因的枯草芽孢杆菌 AP-01 菌株生产的。它被认为不含生产生物的可存活细胞。该食品酶制剂可用于五种食品生产工艺。由于食品酵素-总有机固体(TOS)的残留量是在一道工序中去除的,因此只计算了其余四道食品生产工序的膳食摄入量。据估计,欧洲人口的膳食摄入量为每天每公斤体重 0.875 毫克 TOS。食品酶的生产菌株有能力产生杆菌肽,因此不符合 "有条件的安全推定 "方法的要求。在工业发酵培养基中检测到了杆菌肽,但在食品酶本身中没有检测到。不过,所使用的杆菌肽分析方法的检测限不足以排除可能存在的杆菌肽,其含量可能会导致抗菌细菌的产生。专家小组搜索了该食物酶的氨基酸序列与已知过敏原的相似性,结果发现28个氨基酸序列与呼吸道过敏原匹配,1个氨基酸序列与接触过敏原匹配,2个氨基酸序列与食物过敏原(甜瓜和石榴)匹配。专家小组认为,不能排除从饮食中摄入这种食物酶后发生过敏反应的风险,特别是对甜瓜或石榴过敏的人,但不会超过食用甜瓜或石榴的风险。根据所提供的数据,专家小组无法排除食品中含有一种在医学上具有重要意义的抗菌素--杆菌肽,因此无法确定这种食品酵素的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme subtilisin from the non-genetically modified Bacillus paralicheniformis strain AP-01

The food enzyme subtilisin (EC 3.4.21.62) is produced with the non-genetically modified Bacillus paralicheniformis strain AP-01 by Nagase (Europa) GmbH. It was considered free from viable cells of the production organism. The food enzyme is intended to be used in five food manufacturing processes. Since residual amounts of food enzyme-total organic solids (TOS) are removed in one process, dietary exposure was calculated only for the remaining four food manufacturing processes. It was estimated to be up to 0.875 mg TOS/kg body weight per day in European populations. The production strain of the food enzyme has the capacity to produce bacitracin and thus failed to meet the requirements of the Qualified Presumption of Safety approach. Bacitracin was detected in the industrial fermentation medium but not in the food enzyme itself. However, the limit of detection of the analytical method used for bacitracin was not sufficient to exclude the possible presence of bacitracin at a level representing a risk for the development of antimicrobial resistant bacteria. A search for the similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and twenty-eight matches with respiratory allergens, one match with a contact allergen and two matches with food allergens (melon and pomegranate) were found. The Panel considered that the risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure to this food enzyme, particularly in individuals sensitised to melon or pomegranate, cannot be excluded, but would not exceed the risk of consuming melon or pomegranate. Based on the data provided, the Panel could not exclude the presence of bacitracin, a medically important antimicrobial, and consequently the safety of this food enzyme could not be established.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
期刊最新文献
Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for cycloxydim in various crops Pest categorisation of non-EU Scolytinae on non-coniferous hosts Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Bacillus velezensis RTI301 Safety evaluation of curdlan as a food additive Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Bacillus subtilis strain RTI477
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1