对自闭症谱系障碍的早期干预实施统一的结果测量方法。

Deanna Swain, Yi Li, Hallie R Brown, Eva Petkova, Catherine Lord, Sally J Rogers, Annette Estes, Connie Kasari, So Hyun Kim
{"title":"对自闭症谱系障碍的早期干预实施统一的结果测量方法。","authors":"Deanna Swain, Yi Li, Hallie R Brown, Eva Petkova, Catherine Lord, Sally J Rogers, Annette Estes, Connie Kasari, So Hyun Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder show evidence for effectiveness for specific social communication targets such as joint attention or engagement. However, combining evidence from different studies and comparing intervention effects across those studies have not been feasible due to lack of a standardized outcome measure of broader social communication skills that can be applied uniformly across trials. This investigation examined the usefulness of the Brief Observation of Social Communication Change (BOSCC) as a common outcome measure of general social communication skills based on secondary analyses of data obtained from previously conducted randomized controlled trials of 3 intervention models, Early Social Intervention (ESI), Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) and Joint Attention Symbolic Play Engagement and Regulation (JASPER).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The subset of datasets from the 3 randomized controlled trials was created to examine differences in the BOSCC scores between intervention and control groups over the course of the interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on 582 videos from 207 caregiver-child dyads, the BOSCC noted significant differences between intervention vs control groups in broad social communication skills within 2 of the 3 intervention models, which were longer in duration and focused on a broad range of developmental skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BOSCC offers the potential to take a uniform measurement approach across different intervention models to capture the effect of intervention on general social communication skills but may not pick up the effects of some brief interventions targeting proximal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration information: </strong>Comparing Parent-Implemented Interventions for Toddlers With Autism Spectrum Disorders; https://www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov/; NCT00760812. Intensive Intervention for Toddlers With Autism (EARLY STEPS); https://www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov/; NCT00698997. Social and Communication Outcomes for Young Children With Autism; https://www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov/; NCT00953095.</p>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing a Uniform Outcome Measurement Approach for Early Interventions of Autism Spectrum Disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Deanna Swain, Yi Li, Hallie R Brown, Eva Petkova, Catherine Lord, Sally J Rogers, Annette Estes, Connie Kasari, So Hyun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder show evidence for effectiveness for specific social communication targets such as joint attention or engagement. However, combining evidence from different studies and comparing intervention effects across those studies have not been feasible due to lack of a standardized outcome measure of broader social communication skills that can be applied uniformly across trials. This investigation examined the usefulness of the Brief Observation of Social Communication Change (BOSCC) as a common outcome measure of general social communication skills based on secondary analyses of data obtained from previously conducted randomized controlled trials of 3 intervention models, Early Social Intervention (ESI), Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) and Joint Attention Symbolic Play Engagement and Regulation (JASPER).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The subset of datasets from the 3 randomized controlled trials was created to examine differences in the BOSCC scores between intervention and control groups over the course of the interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on 582 videos from 207 caregiver-child dyads, the BOSCC noted significant differences between intervention vs control groups in broad social communication skills within 2 of the 3 intervention models, which were longer in duration and focused on a broad range of developmental skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BOSCC offers the potential to take a uniform measurement approach across different intervention models to capture the effect of intervention on general social communication skills but may not pick up the effects of some brief interventions targeting proximal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration information: </strong>Comparing Parent-Implemented Interventions for Toddlers With Autism Spectrum Disorders; https://www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov/; NCT00760812. Intensive Intervention for Toddlers With Autism (EARLY STEPS); https://www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov/; NCT00698997. Social and Communication Outcomes for Young Children With Autism; https://www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov/; NCT00953095.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.06.004\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.06.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:针对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童的自然发展行为干预(NDBI)有证据表明对特定的社交沟通目标(如共同关注或参与)有效。然而,由于缺乏可统一应用于各项试验的、对更广泛的社会交往技能进行标准化结果测量的方法,因此将来自不同研究的证据结合起来并比较这些研究的干预效果并不可行。本调查基于对之前进行的随机对照试验(RCTs)中三种干预模式(早期社会干预(ESI)、丹佛早期起步模式(ESDM)和联合注意象征性游戏参与和调节(JASPER))数据的二次分析,研究了社会交流变化简要观察(BOSCC)作为一般社会交流技能通用结果测量方法的实用性:方法:从三项 RCT 中创建数据子集,以检查干预组和对照组在干预过程中 BOSCC 分数的差异:根据来自 207 个照顾者-儿童二人组的 582 个视频,BOSCC 发现在三种干预模式中的两种模式下,干预组与对照组在广泛的社会交往技能方面存在显著差异:结论:BOSCC 有可能在不同的干预模式中采用统一的测量方法,以捕捉干预对一般社交沟通技能的影响,但可能无法捕捉到某些针对近端结果的简短干预的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementing a Uniform Outcome Measurement Approach for Early Interventions of Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Objective: Naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder show evidence for effectiveness for specific social communication targets such as joint attention or engagement. However, combining evidence from different studies and comparing intervention effects across those studies have not been feasible due to lack of a standardized outcome measure of broader social communication skills that can be applied uniformly across trials. This investigation examined the usefulness of the Brief Observation of Social Communication Change (BOSCC) as a common outcome measure of general social communication skills based on secondary analyses of data obtained from previously conducted randomized controlled trials of 3 intervention models, Early Social Intervention (ESI), Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) and Joint Attention Symbolic Play Engagement and Regulation (JASPER).

Method: The subset of datasets from the 3 randomized controlled trials was created to examine differences in the BOSCC scores between intervention and control groups over the course of the interventions.

Results: Based on 582 videos from 207 caregiver-child dyads, the BOSCC noted significant differences between intervention vs control groups in broad social communication skills within 2 of the 3 intervention models, which were longer in duration and focused on a broad range of developmental skills.

Conclusion: The BOSCC offers the potential to take a uniform measurement approach across different intervention models to capture the effect of intervention on general social communication skills but may not pick up the effects of some brief interventions targeting proximal outcomes.

Clinical trial registration information: Comparing Parent-Implemented Interventions for Toddlers With Autism Spectrum Disorders; https://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov/; NCT00760812. Intensive Intervention for Toddlers With Autism (EARLY STEPS); https://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov/; NCT00698997. Social and Communication Outcomes for Young Children With Autism; https://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov/; NCT00953095.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1383
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families. We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings. In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health. At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.
期刊最新文献
Protecting Sense of Self. A Dose-Finding, Biomarker Validation, and Effectiveness Study of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Adolescents With Depression. Dr. Pumariega Replies. Neural and Behavioral Correlates of Binge Eating in 9- to 10-Year-Old Children. An Imperative to Include Children's Voices in Policy Development: Part of the Solution to Understanding the Impact of Policy on Children's Mental Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1