大核心急性缺血性脑卒中患者在血管内治疗前静脉溶栓对预后的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1007/s10072-024-07682-7
Jiali Liu, Jialiang Wang, Yujie Wang
{"title":"大核心急性缺血性脑卒中患者在血管内治疗前静脉溶栓对预后的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jiali Liu, Jialiang Wang, Yujie Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07682-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before endovascular therapy (EVT) on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke of large core.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The studies comparing functional outcomes after EVT with and without IVT were systematically searched up to October 10th, 2023. Odds ratio (OR) was pooled using random effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed stratified by study design, country or region, study date, imaging methods and time window.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included, enrolling 1717 patients. The pooled rate of functional independence in patients receiving IVT + EVT was 26% (95% CI 20% - 33%), significantly higher than 18% (95% CI 15% - 20%) in those receiving EVT alone (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.13-2.12, P = 0.006; I²= 23.9%). In subgroup analysis, prior IVT increased the probability of functional independence in retrospective studies (OR 1.97, 95% 1.47-2.63, P < 0.00001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0). Non-Asian patients benefit from IVT before EVT for functional independence (OR 2.04, 95% 1.48-2.81, P < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0), but Asian patients did not (OR 1.45, 95% 0.90-2.35, p = 0.13; I<sup>2</sup> = 0). The pooled rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving IVT + EVT was 16% (95% CI 12% - 20%), inclining to be higher than 11% (95% CI 6% - 15%) in those receiving EVT alone without significant difference (OR 1.42, 0.83-2.41, P = 0.20; I²= 12%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IVT before EVT might increase the probability of functional independence in non-Asian patients with large ischemic core. The results provided clinicians with additional information on selecting eligible patients for EVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"5617-5625"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular therapy on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke with large core: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jiali Liu, Jialiang Wang, Yujie Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10072-024-07682-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before endovascular therapy (EVT) on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke of large core.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The studies comparing functional outcomes after EVT with and without IVT were systematically searched up to October 10th, 2023. Odds ratio (OR) was pooled using random effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed stratified by study design, country or region, study date, imaging methods and time window.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included, enrolling 1717 patients. The pooled rate of functional independence in patients receiving IVT + EVT was 26% (95% CI 20% - 33%), significantly higher than 18% (95% CI 15% - 20%) in those receiving EVT alone (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.13-2.12, P = 0.006; I²= 23.9%). In subgroup analysis, prior IVT increased the probability of functional independence in retrospective studies (OR 1.97, 95% 1.47-2.63, P < 0.00001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0). Non-Asian patients benefit from IVT before EVT for functional independence (OR 2.04, 95% 1.48-2.81, P < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0), but Asian patients did not (OR 1.45, 95% 0.90-2.35, p = 0.13; I<sup>2</sup> = 0). The pooled rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving IVT + EVT was 16% (95% CI 12% - 20%), inclining to be higher than 11% (95% CI 6% - 15%) in those receiving EVT alone without significant difference (OR 1.42, 0.83-2.41, P = 0.20; I²= 12%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IVT before EVT might increase the probability of functional independence in non-Asian patients with large ischemic core. The results provided clinicians with additional information on selecting eligible patients for EVT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5617-5625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07682-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07682-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究血管内治疗(EVT)前静脉溶栓(IVT)对大核心急性缺血性卒中预后的影响:方法:系统检索了截至 2023 年 10 月 10 日的研究,这些研究比较了有 IVT 和无 IVT 的 EVT 后的功能预后。采用随机效应模型对比值比(OR)进行汇总。根据研究设计、国家或地区、研究日期、成像方法和时间窗进行了分组分析:结果:共纳入了 13 项研究,1717 名患者参与了研究。接受IVT+EVT治疗的患者功能独立率为26%(95% CI 20% - 33%),明显高于单独接受EVT治疗的患者的18%(95% CI 15% - 20%)(OR 1.55,95% CI 1.13-2.12,P = 0.006;I²= 23.9%)。在亚组分析中,在回顾性研究中,先行 IVT 会增加功能独立的概率(OR 1.97,95% 1.47-2.63,P 2 = 0)。非亚裔患者在 EVT 前进行 IVT 有利于实现功能独立(OR 2.04,95% 1.48-2.81,P 2 = 0),但亚裔患者则不然(OR 1.45,95% 0.90-2.35,P = 0.13;I2 = 0)。接受IVT+EVT的患者出现症状性颅内出血的总比率为16%(95% CI 12%-20%),高于单独接受EVT的患者的11%(95% CI 6%-15%),但无显著差异(OR 1.42,0.83-2.41,P = 0.20;I²= 12%):结论:在EVT前进行IVT可能会增加大面积缺血核心的非亚洲患者功能独立的概率。结果为临床医生选择符合条件的患者进行EVT提供了更多信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular therapy on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke with large core: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: To investigate the effect of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before endovascular therapy (EVT) on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke of large core.

Methods: The studies comparing functional outcomes after EVT with and without IVT were systematically searched up to October 10th, 2023. Odds ratio (OR) was pooled using random effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed stratified by study design, country or region, study date, imaging methods and time window.

Results: Thirteen studies were included, enrolling 1717 patients. The pooled rate of functional independence in patients receiving IVT + EVT was 26% (95% CI 20% - 33%), significantly higher than 18% (95% CI 15% - 20%) in those receiving EVT alone (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.13-2.12, P = 0.006; I²= 23.9%). In subgroup analysis, prior IVT increased the probability of functional independence in retrospective studies (OR 1.97, 95% 1.47-2.63, P < 0.00001; I2 = 0). Non-Asian patients benefit from IVT before EVT for functional independence (OR 2.04, 95% 1.48-2.81, P < 0.0001; I2 = 0), but Asian patients did not (OR 1.45, 95% 0.90-2.35, p = 0.13; I2 = 0). The pooled rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving IVT + EVT was 16% (95% CI 12% - 20%), inclining to be higher than 11% (95% CI 6% - 15%) in those receiving EVT alone without significant difference (OR 1.42, 0.83-2.41, P = 0.20; I²= 12%).

Conclusions: IVT before EVT might increase the probability of functional independence in non-Asian patients with large ischemic core. The results provided clinicians with additional information on selecting eligible patients for EVT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke with large infarct, short‑ and long‑term outcomes: a meta‑analysis of 6 randomised control trials. Correction to: Clinical, electrophysiological, and genetic analysis of a family with two rare neuromuscular disorders: congenital myasthenic syndrome and hereditary polyneuropathy. Endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke with large infarct, short- and long-term outcomes: a meta-analysis of 6 randomised control trials. Effect of intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular therapy on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke with large core: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Efficacy of pain management strategies in adults with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS): A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1