不同的世界观:幸福、意义和心理丰富性的政治学。

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1111/jopy.12959
Shigehiro Oishi, Hyewon Choi, Youngjae Cha, Samantha Heintzelman, Nicholas R Buttrick, Erin C Westgate
{"title":"不同的世界观:幸福、意义和心理丰富性的政治学。","authors":"Shigehiro Oishi, Hyewon Choi, Youngjae Cha, Samantha Heintzelman, Nicholas R Buttrick, Erin C Westgate","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective/background: </strong>Conservative ideology, broadly speaking, has been widely linked to greater happiness and meaning in life. Is that true of all forms of a good life? We examined whether a psychologically rich life is associated with political orientation, system justification, and Protestant work ethic, independent of two other traditional forms of a good life: a happy life and a meaningful life.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants completed a questionnaire that assessed conservative worldviews and three aspects of well-being (N = 583 in Study 1; N = 348 in Study 2; N = 436 in Study 3; N = 1,217 in Study 4; N = 2,176 in Study 5; N = 516 in Study 6).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Happiness was associated with political conservatism and system justification, and meaning in life was associated with Protestant work ethic. In contrast, zero-order correlations showed that psychological richness was not associated with conservative worldviews. However, when happiness and meaning in life were included in multiple regression models, the nature of the association shifted: Psychological richness was consistently inversely associated with system justification and on average less political conservatism, suggesting that happiness and meaning in life were suppressor variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that happiness and meaning in life are associated with conservative ideology, whereas psychological richness is not.</p>","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differing worldviews: The politics of happiness, meaning, and psychological richness.\",\"authors\":\"Shigehiro Oishi, Hyewon Choi, Youngjae Cha, Samantha Heintzelman, Nicholas R Buttrick, Erin C Westgate\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jopy.12959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective/background: </strong>Conservative ideology, broadly speaking, has been widely linked to greater happiness and meaning in life. Is that true of all forms of a good life? We examined whether a psychologically rich life is associated with political orientation, system justification, and Protestant work ethic, independent of two other traditional forms of a good life: a happy life and a meaningful life.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants completed a questionnaire that assessed conservative worldviews and three aspects of well-being (N = 583 in Study 1; N = 348 in Study 2; N = 436 in Study 3; N = 1,217 in Study 4; N = 2,176 in Study 5; N = 516 in Study 6).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Happiness was associated with political conservatism and system justification, and meaning in life was associated with Protestant work ethic. In contrast, zero-order correlations showed that psychological richness was not associated with conservative worldviews. However, when happiness and meaning in life were included in multiple regression models, the nature of the association shifted: Psychological richness was consistently inversely associated with system justification and on average less political conservatism, suggesting that happiness and meaning in life were suppressor variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that happiness and meaning in life are associated with conservative ideology, whereas psychological richness is not.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12959\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12959","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标/背景:从广义上讲,保守的意识形态与更大的幸福感和人生意义有着广泛的联系。所有形式的美好生活都是如此吗?我们研究了心理丰富的生活是否与政治取向、制度合理性和新教工作伦理相关,是否独立于其他两种传统形式的美好生活:幸福生活和有意义的生活:受试者填写了一份调查问卷,对保守的世界观和幸福感的三个方面进行了评估(研究 1:583 人;研究 2:348 人;研究 3:436 人;研究 4:1217 人;研究 5:2176 人;研究 6:516 人):结果:幸福感与政治保守主义和制度合理性相关,人生意义与新教工作伦理相关。相反,零阶相关性表明,心理丰富性与保守的世界观无关。然而,当幸福感和人生意义被纳入多元回归模型时,两者的关联性质发生了变化:心理丰富度一直与制度合理性成反比,而且平均政治保守主义程度较低,这表明幸福感和人生意义是抑制变量:这些研究结果表明,幸福感和人生意义与保守的意识形态相关,而心理丰富性与之无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differing worldviews: The politics of happiness, meaning, and psychological richness.

Objective/background: Conservative ideology, broadly speaking, has been widely linked to greater happiness and meaning in life. Is that true of all forms of a good life? We examined whether a psychologically rich life is associated with political orientation, system justification, and Protestant work ethic, independent of two other traditional forms of a good life: a happy life and a meaningful life.

Method: Participants completed a questionnaire that assessed conservative worldviews and three aspects of well-being (N = 583 in Study 1; N = 348 in Study 2; N = 436 in Study 3; N = 1,217 in Study 4; N = 2,176 in Study 5; N = 516 in Study 6).

Results: Happiness was associated with political conservatism and system justification, and meaning in life was associated with Protestant work ethic. In contrast, zero-order correlations showed that psychological richness was not associated with conservative worldviews. However, when happiness and meaning in life were included in multiple regression models, the nature of the association shifted: Psychological richness was consistently inversely associated with system justification and on average less political conservatism, suggesting that happiness and meaning in life were suppressor variables.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that happiness and meaning in life are associated with conservative ideology, whereas psychological richness is not.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
期刊最新文献
Constructing the "Family Personality": Can Family Functioning Be Linked to Parent-Child Interpersonal Neural Synchronization? Neuroticism is Associated With Greater Affective Variability at High Levels of Momentary Affective Well-Being, but With Lower Affective Variability at Low Levels of Momentary Affective Well-Being. Issue Information The Connection Between Dark Traits and Emotional Intelligence: A Multistudy Person-Centered Approach. The Effects of Multifaceted Introversion and Sensory Processing Sensitivity on Solitude-Seeking Behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1