电子病历驱动的 EPA 评估大大提高了参与度。

Carolyn Chang, Jonathan Jesneck, Emily Lee, Karen Brasel, Mackenzie Cook, Ramanathan Seshadri, James Nitzkorski, Rebecca Rhee, Julia Shelton, Ruchi Thanawala
{"title":"电子病历驱动的 EPA 评估大大提高了参与度。","authors":"Carolyn Chang, Jonathan Jesneck, Emily Lee, Karen Brasel, Mackenzie Cook, Ramanathan Seshadri, James Nitzkorski, Rebecca Rhee, Julia Shelton, Ruchi Thanawala","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Digital education tools are a cornerstone in the evolution to CBME through EPAs. Successful implementation requires understanding the variable impacts of EHR-driven delivery of EPAs, flexible digital device access to EPAs, and user-behavior trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through a HIPAA compliant, flexible-device accessible, surgical education platform, general surgery training programs at 21 institutions collected EPA from July 2023 to April 2024. At 5 EHR-integrated institutions (EHR+), EPA were created for clinical activities based on the OR schedule, automatically pushed to attendings and residents with built in completion reminders. At 16 institutions without EHR integration (EHR-), EPA were initiated manually. To improve user experience, care phases were bundled (cEPA). We compared the EHR+ and EHR- groups, computing descriptive statistics on the cEPAs completed and user behavior metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected 4187 cEPAs in total, with 82% at EHR+ institutions and 18% at EHR- institutions. Platform triggering dramatically drove cEPA completion for both faculty and residents, 88% and 81%, respectively. Only 3% were initiated by the faculty or resident. Faculty at EHR+ institutions strongly preferred the automated OR-triggered workflow to start their EPAs (Chi-squared test, p ≈ 0). Faculty completed all 3 care phases nearly 80% of the time. Time reminders specifically drive EPA completion for residents and faculty on weekdays and build habits on weekends. 71% of cEPAs completed were by computer, and 29% by phone. More comments were provided when computers were used. Residents reviewed feedback with a median lag of 1 hour and 29 min after results were available.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EHR-driven delivery of EPA leads to a 4.6-fold increase in EPAs completed. EPA initiation is the most critical phase in the workflow and EHR-data driven alerts drive this action. These alerts are also effective drivers of habit formation. Flexible device access is important to increase EPAs completed and improve the usefulness through comments for residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":94109,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EHR-Driven Delivery of EPA Assessments Significantly Improves Participation.\",\"authors\":\"Carolyn Chang, Jonathan Jesneck, Emily Lee, Karen Brasel, Mackenzie Cook, Ramanathan Seshadri, James Nitzkorski, Rebecca Rhee, Julia Shelton, Ruchi Thanawala\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Digital education tools are a cornerstone in the evolution to CBME through EPAs. Successful implementation requires understanding the variable impacts of EHR-driven delivery of EPAs, flexible digital device access to EPAs, and user-behavior trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through a HIPAA compliant, flexible-device accessible, surgical education platform, general surgery training programs at 21 institutions collected EPA from July 2023 to April 2024. At 5 EHR-integrated institutions (EHR+), EPA were created for clinical activities based on the OR schedule, automatically pushed to attendings and residents with built in completion reminders. At 16 institutions without EHR integration (EHR-), EPA were initiated manually. To improve user experience, care phases were bundled (cEPA). We compared the EHR+ and EHR- groups, computing descriptive statistics on the cEPAs completed and user behavior metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected 4187 cEPAs in total, with 82% at EHR+ institutions and 18% at EHR- institutions. Platform triggering dramatically drove cEPA completion for both faculty and residents, 88% and 81%, respectively. Only 3% were initiated by the faculty or resident. Faculty at EHR+ institutions strongly preferred the automated OR-triggered workflow to start their EPAs (Chi-squared test, p ≈ 0). Faculty completed all 3 care phases nearly 80% of the time. Time reminders specifically drive EPA completion for residents and faculty on weekdays and build habits on weekends. 71% of cEPAs completed were by computer, and 29% by phone. More comments were provided when computers were used. Residents reviewed feedback with a median lag of 1 hour and 29 min after results were available.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EHR-driven delivery of EPA leads to a 4.6-fold increase in EPAs completed. EPA initiation is the most critical phase in the workflow and EHR-data driven alerts drive this action. These alerts are also effective drivers of habit formation. Flexible device access is important to increase EPAs completed and improve the usefulness through comments for residents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of surgical education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of surgical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:数字教育工具是通过 EPA 向 CBME 演进的基石。成功实施需要了解电子病历驱动的 EPAs 交付、灵活的数字设备访问 EPAs 以及用户行为趋势的不同影响:通过一个符合 HIPAA 标准、可通过灵活设备访问的外科教育平台,21 家机构的普通外科培训项目收集了 2023 年 7 月至 2024 年 4 月期间的 EPA。在5家整合了电子病历的机构(EHR+),根据手术室日程表为临床活动创建了EPA,并自动推送给主治医师和住院医师,同时内置了完成提醒功能。在 16 家未整合电子病历的机构(EHR-)中,EPA 是手动启动的。为了改善用户体验,护理阶段被捆绑在一起(cEPA)。我们比较了 EHR+ 组和 EHR- 组,计算了已完成 cEPA 的描述性统计和用户行为指标:我们共收集了 4187 份 cEPA,其中 82% 来自 EHR+ 机构,18% 来自 EHR- 机构。平台触发极大地推动了教师和住院医师的 cEPA 完成率,分别为 88% 和 81%。只有 3% 是由教师或住院医师发起的。EHR+机构的教员更倾向于使用手术室触发的自动化工作流程来启动他们的EPA(卡方检验,P≈0)。近 80% 的教员完成了所有 3 个护理阶段。时间提醒专门推动住院医师和教员在工作日完成 EPA,并在周末培养他们的习惯。71% 的 cEPA 是通过电脑完成的,29% 是通过电话完成的。在使用电脑的情况下,反馈意见更多。住院医师在获得结果后审查反馈意见的中位时滞为 1 小时 29 分钟:结论:电子病历驱动的 EPA 交付使完成的 EPA 增加了 4.6 倍。EPA 启动是工作流程中最关键的阶段,而电子病历数据驱动的警报则推动了这一行动。这些提示也能有效促进习惯的养成。灵活的设备访问对于增加 EPA 的完成率和提高居民意见的实用性非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EHR-Driven Delivery of EPA Assessments Significantly Improves Participation.

Introduction: Digital education tools are a cornerstone in the evolution to CBME through EPAs. Successful implementation requires understanding the variable impacts of EHR-driven delivery of EPAs, flexible digital device access to EPAs, and user-behavior trends.

Methods: Through a HIPAA compliant, flexible-device accessible, surgical education platform, general surgery training programs at 21 institutions collected EPA from July 2023 to April 2024. At 5 EHR-integrated institutions (EHR+), EPA were created for clinical activities based on the OR schedule, automatically pushed to attendings and residents with built in completion reminders. At 16 institutions without EHR integration (EHR-), EPA were initiated manually. To improve user experience, care phases were bundled (cEPA). We compared the EHR+ and EHR- groups, computing descriptive statistics on the cEPAs completed and user behavior metrics.

Results: We collected 4187 cEPAs in total, with 82% at EHR+ institutions and 18% at EHR- institutions. Platform triggering dramatically drove cEPA completion for both faculty and residents, 88% and 81%, respectively. Only 3% were initiated by the faculty or resident. Faculty at EHR+ institutions strongly preferred the automated OR-triggered workflow to start their EPAs (Chi-squared test, p ≈ 0). Faculty completed all 3 care phases nearly 80% of the time. Time reminders specifically drive EPA completion for residents and faculty on weekdays and build habits on weekends. 71% of cEPAs completed were by computer, and 29% by phone. More comments were provided when computers were used. Residents reviewed feedback with a median lag of 1 hour and 29 min after results were available.

Conclusions: EHR-driven delivery of EPA leads to a 4.6-fold increase in EPAs completed. EPA initiation is the most critical phase in the workflow and EHR-data driven alerts drive this action. These alerts are also effective drivers of habit formation. Flexible device access is important to increase EPAs completed and improve the usefulness through comments for residents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perspectives on Application and Interview Capping in Residency Selection of Surgical Subspecialties. EHR-Driven Delivery of EPA Assessments Significantly Improves Participation. Kar Seva. Exploring Medical Students' Perceptions of Peer-to-Peer Interactions Related to Applying to a Surgical Residency. Development of a Competency Framework Defining Effective Surgical Educators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1