科学委员会关于评估和整合流行病学研究证据以用于欧洲食物安全局科学评估的指南

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EFSA Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8866
EFSA Scientific Committee, Simon More, Vasileios Bampidis, Diane Benford, Claude Bragard, Antonio Hernandez-Jerez, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Konstantinos Koutsoumanis, Claude Lambré, Kyriaki Machera, Wim Mennes, Ewen Mullins, Soren Saxmose Nielsen, Josef Schlatter, Dieter Schrenk, Dominique Turck, Maged Younes, Tony Fletcher, Matthias Greiner, Evangelia Ntzani, Neil Pearce, Marco Vinceti, Martine Vrijheid, Marios Georgiadis, Andrea Gervelmeyer, Thorhallur I. Halldorsson
{"title":"科学委员会关于评估和整合流行病学研究证据以用于欧洲食物安全局科学评估的指南","authors":"EFSA Scientific Committee,&nbsp;Simon More,&nbsp;Vasileios Bampidis,&nbsp;Diane Benford,&nbsp;Claude Bragard,&nbsp;Antonio Hernandez-Jerez,&nbsp;Susanne Hougaard Bennekou,&nbsp;Konstantinos Koutsoumanis,&nbsp;Claude Lambré,&nbsp;Kyriaki Machera,&nbsp;Wim Mennes,&nbsp;Ewen Mullins,&nbsp;Soren Saxmose Nielsen,&nbsp;Josef Schlatter,&nbsp;Dieter Schrenk,&nbsp;Dominique Turck,&nbsp;Maged Younes,&nbsp;Tony Fletcher,&nbsp;Matthias Greiner,&nbsp;Evangelia Ntzani,&nbsp;Neil Pearce,&nbsp;Marco Vinceti,&nbsp;Martine Vrijheid,&nbsp;Marios Georgiadis,&nbsp;Andrea Gervelmeyer,&nbsp;Thorhallur I. Halldorsson","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>EFSA requested its Scientific Committee to prepare a guidance document on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments. The guidance document provides an introduction to epidemiological studies and illustrates the typical biases, which may be present in different epidemiological study designs. It then describes key epidemiological concepts relevant for evidence appraisal. This includes brief explanations for measures of association, exposure assessment, statistical inference, systematic error and effect modification. The guidance then describes the concept of external validity and the principles of appraising epidemiological studies. The customisation of the study appraisal process is explained including tailoring of tools for assessing the risk of bias (RoB). Several examples of appraising experimental and observational studies using a RoB tool are annexed to the document to illustrate the application of the approach. The latter part of this guidance focuses on different steps of evidence integration, first within and then across different streams of evidence. With respect to risk characterisation, the guidance considers how evidence from human epidemiological studies can be used in dose–response modelling with several different options being presented. Finally, the guidance addresses the application of uncertainty factors in risk characterisation when using evidence from human epidemiological studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8866","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientific Committee guidance on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments\",\"authors\":\"EFSA Scientific Committee,&nbsp;Simon More,&nbsp;Vasileios Bampidis,&nbsp;Diane Benford,&nbsp;Claude Bragard,&nbsp;Antonio Hernandez-Jerez,&nbsp;Susanne Hougaard Bennekou,&nbsp;Konstantinos Koutsoumanis,&nbsp;Claude Lambré,&nbsp;Kyriaki Machera,&nbsp;Wim Mennes,&nbsp;Ewen Mullins,&nbsp;Soren Saxmose Nielsen,&nbsp;Josef Schlatter,&nbsp;Dieter Schrenk,&nbsp;Dominique Turck,&nbsp;Maged Younes,&nbsp;Tony Fletcher,&nbsp;Matthias Greiner,&nbsp;Evangelia Ntzani,&nbsp;Neil Pearce,&nbsp;Marco Vinceti,&nbsp;Martine Vrijheid,&nbsp;Marios Georgiadis,&nbsp;Andrea Gervelmeyer,&nbsp;Thorhallur I. Halldorsson\",\"doi\":\"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>EFSA requested its Scientific Committee to prepare a guidance document on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments. The guidance document provides an introduction to epidemiological studies and illustrates the typical biases, which may be present in different epidemiological study designs. It then describes key epidemiological concepts relevant for evidence appraisal. This includes brief explanations for measures of association, exposure assessment, statistical inference, systematic error and effect modification. The guidance then describes the concept of external validity and the principles of appraising epidemiological studies. The customisation of the study appraisal process is explained including tailoring of tools for assessing the risk of bias (RoB). Several examples of appraising experimental and observational studies using a RoB tool are annexed to the document to illustrate the application of the approach. The latter part of this guidance focuses on different steps of evidence integration, first within and then across different streams of evidence. With respect to risk characterisation, the guidance considers how evidence from human epidemiological studies can be used in dose–response modelling with several different options being presented. Finally, the guidance addresses the application of uncertainty factors in risk characterisation when using evidence from human epidemiological studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8866\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8866\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8866","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲食物安全局要求其科学委员会编写一份关于评估和整合流行病学研究证据的指导文件,用于欧洲食物安全局的科学评估。该指导文件介绍了流行病学研究,并说明了不同流行病学研究设计中可能存在的典型偏差。然后介绍了与证据评估相关的主要流行病学概念。其中包括对关联测量、暴露评估、统计推论、系统误差和效应修正的简要解释。然后,指南介绍了外部有效性的概念和流行病学研究的评估原则。对研究评估流程的定制进行了说明,包括评估偏倚风险 (RoB) 的定制工具。本文件附有使用 RoB 工具评估实验研究和观察性研究的几个实例,以说明该方法的应用。本指南的后半部分侧重于证据整合的不同步骤,首先是证据流内部的整合,然后是不同证据流之间的整合。在风险特征描述方面,指南考虑了如何将人类流行病学研究的证据用于剂量-反应模型,并提出了几种不同的方案。最后,指南讨论了在使用人类流行病学研究证据时,如何在风险特征描述中应用不确定性因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scientific Committee guidance on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments

EFSA requested its Scientific Committee to prepare a guidance document on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments. The guidance document provides an introduction to epidemiological studies and illustrates the typical biases, which may be present in different epidemiological study designs. It then describes key epidemiological concepts relevant for evidence appraisal. This includes brief explanations for measures of association, exposure assessment, statistical inference, systematic error and effect modification. The guidance then describes the concept of external validity and the principles of appraising epidemiological studies. The customisation of the study appraisal process is explained including tailoring of tools for assessing the risk of bias (RoB). Several examples of appraising experimental and observational studies using a RoB tool are annexed to the document to illustrate the application of the approach. The latter part of this guidance focuses on different steps of evidence integration, first within and then across different streams of evidence. With respect to risk characterisation, the guidance considers how evidence from human epidemiological studies can be used in dose–response modelling with several different options being presented. Finally, the guidance addresses the application of uncertainty factors in risk characterisation when using evidence from human epidemiological studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
期刊最新文献
Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for cycloxydim in various crops Pest categorisation of non-EU Scolytinae on non-coniferous hosts Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Bacillus velezensis RTI301 Safety evaluation of curdlan as a food additive Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Bacillus subtilis strain RTI477
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1