Martin A Garenfeld, Alba Jimenez-Diaz, Victor Navarro-Moreno, Mario Tormo, Matija Trbac, Erik Hernandez, Rosa M Banos, Rocio Herrero, Strahinja Dosen
{"title":"调节电触觉刺激的保真度和空间范围,诱发虚拟手的体现。","authors":"Martin A Garenfeld, Alba Jimenez-Diaz, Victor Navarro-Moreno, Mario Tormo, Matija Trbac, Erik Hernandez, Rosa M Banos, Rocio Herrero, Strahinja Dosen","doi":"10.1109/TOH.2024.3424298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Restoring tactile feedback in virtual reality can improve user experience and facilitate the feeling of embodiment. Electrotactile stimulation can be an attractive technology in this context as it is compact and allows for high-resolution spatially distributed stimulation. In the present study, a 32-channel tactile glove worn on the fingertips was used to provide tactile sensations during a virtual version of a rubber hand illusion experiment. To assess the benefits of multichannel stimulation, we modulated the spatial extent of feedback and its fidelity. Thirty-six participants performed the experiment in two conditions, in which stimulation was delivered to a single finger or all fingers, and three tactile stimulation types within each condition: no tactile feedback, simple single-point stimulation, and complex sliding stimulation mimicking the movements of the brush. Following each trial, the participants answered a multi-item embodiment questionnaire and reported the proprioceptive drift. The results confirmed that modulating the spatial extent of stimulation, from a single finger to all fingers, was indeed a successful strategy. When stimulating all fingers, tactile stimulation significantly improved all subjective measures compared to receiving no tactile stimulation. However, unexpectedly, the second strategy, that of modulating the fidelity of feedback, was not successful since there was no difference between the simple and complex tactile feedback in any of the measures. The results, therefore, imply that the effects of tactile feedback are better expressed in a more dynamic scenario (i.e., making/breaking contact and delivering stimulation to different body locations), while it still needs to be investigated if further improvements of the complex feedback can make it more effective compared to the simple approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":13215,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Haptics","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modulating the fidelity and spatial extent of electrotactile stimulation to elicit the embodiment of a virtual hand.\",\"authors\":\"Martin A Garenfeld, Alba Jimenez-Diaz, Victor Navarro-Moreno, Mario Tormo, Matija Trbac, Erik Hernandez, Rosa M Banos, Rocio Herrero, Strahinja Dosen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TOH.2024.3424298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Restoring tactile feedback in virtual reality can improve user experience and facilitate the feeling of embodiment. Electrotactile stimulation can be an attractive technology in this context as it is compact and allows for high-resolution spatially distributed stimulation. In the present study, a 32-channel tactile glove worn on the fingertips was used to provide tactile sensations during a virtual version of a rubber hand illusion experiment. To assess the benefits of multichannel stimulation, we modulated the spatial extent of feedback and its fidelity. Thirty-six participants performed the experiment in two conditions, in which stimulation was delivered to a single finger or all fingers, and three tactile stimulation types within each condition: no tactile feedback, simple single-point stimulation, and complex sliding stimulation mimicking the movements of the brush. Following each trial, the participants answered a multi-item embodiment questionnaire and reported the proprioceptive drift. The results confirmed that modulating the spatial extent of stimulation, from a single finger to all fingers, was indeed a successful strategy. When stimulating all fingers, tactile stimulation significantly improved all subjective measures compared to receiving no tactile stimulation. However, unexpectedly, the second strategy, that of modulating the fidelity of feedback, was not successful since there was no difference between the simple and complex tactile feedback in any of the measures. The results, therefore, imply that the effects of tactile feedback are better expressed in a more dynamic scenario (i.e., making/breaking contact and delivering stimulation to different body locations), while it still needs to be investigated if further improvements of the complex feedback can make it more effective compared to the simple approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Haptics\",\"volume\":\"PP \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Haptics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2024.3424298\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Haptics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2024.3424298","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modulating the fidelity and spatial extent of electrotactile stimulation to elicit the embodiment of a virtual hand.
Restoring tactile feedback in virtual reality can improve user experience and facilitate the feeling of embodiment. Electrotactile stimulation can be an attractive technology in this context as it is compact and allows for high-resolution spatially distributed stimulation. In the present study, a 32-channel tactile glove worn on the fingertips was used to provide tactile sensations during a virtual version of a rubber hand illusion experiment. To assess the benefits of multichannel stimulation, we modulated the spatial extent of feedback and its fidelity. Thirty-six participants performed the experiment in two conditions, in which stimulation was delivered to a single finger or all fingers, and three tactile stimulation types within each condition: no tactile feedback, simple single-point stimulation, and complex sliding stimulation mimicking the movements of the brush. Following each trial, the participants answered a multi-item embodiment questionnaire and reported the proprioceptive drift. The results confirmed that modulating the spatial extent of stimulation, from a single finger to all fingers, was indeed a successful strategy. When stimulating all fingers, tactile stimulation significantly improved all subjective measures compared to receiving no tactile stimulation. However, unexpectedly, the second strategy, that of modulating the fidelity of feedback, was not successful since there was no difference between the simple and complex tactile feedback in any of the measures. The results, therefore, imply that the effects of tactile feedback are better expressed in a more dynamic scenario (i.e., making/breaking contact and delivering stimulation to different body locations), while it still needs to be investigated if further improvements of the complex feedback can make it more effective compared to the simple approach.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Haptics (ToH) is a scholarly archival journal that addresses the science, technology, and applications associated with information acquisition and object manipulation through touch. Haptic interactions relevant to this journal include all aspects of manual exploration and manipulation of objects by humans, machines and interactions between the two, performed in real, virtual, teleoperated or networked environments. Research areas of relevance to this publication include, but are not limited to, the following topics: Human haptic and multi-sensory perception and action, Aspects of motor control that explicitly pertain to human haptics, Haptic interactions via passive or active tools and machines, Devices that sense, enable, or create haptic interactions locally or at a distance, Haptic rendering and its association with graphic and auditory rendering in virtual reality, Algorithms, controls, and dynamics of haptic devices, users, and interactions between the two, Human-machine performance and safety with haptic feedback, Haptics in the context of human-computer interactions, Systems and networks using haptic devices and interactions, including multi-modal feedback, Application of the above, for example in areas such as education, rehabilitation, medicine, computer-aided design, skills training, computer games, driver controls, simulation, and visualization.