老年人常见心理健康问题(CMHP)心理疗法治疗效果的预测因素:系统性文献综述。

IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102463
Alexandra Schmidt , Nick Grey , Clara Strauss , Darya Gaysina
{"title":"老年人常见心理健康问题(CMHP)心理疗法治疗效果的预测因素:系统性文献综述。","authors":"Alexandra Schmidt ,&nbsp;Nick Grey ,&nbsp;Clara Strauss ,&nbsp;Darya Gaysina","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Identifying factors that impact psychological treatment outcomes in older people with common mental health problems (CMHP) has important implications for supporting healthier and longer lives. The aim of the present study was to synthesise the evidence on predictors of psychological treatment outcomes in older people (aged 65+). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO were searched and 3929 articles were identified and screened, with 42 studies (<em>N</em> = 7978, <em>M</em> age = 68.9, <em>SD</em> age = 2.85) included: depression: k = 21, anxiety: k = 11, panic disorder: k = 3, mixed anxiety &amp; depression: k = 3, PTSD: k = 2, various CMHP: k = 2, with CBT being the most common treatment (71%). The review identified 28 factors reported as significant predictors of treatment outcome in at least one study, across different domains: psychosocial (<em>n</em> = 9), clinical (<em>n</em> = 6), treatment-related (<em>n</em> = 6), socio-demographic (<em>n</em> = 4), neurobiological (<em>n</em> = 3). Homework completion was the most consistent predictor of positive treatment outcome. Baseline symptom severity was the most frequently studied significant predictor and across all conditions, with higher baseline symptom severity largely linked to worse treatment outcomes. No significant effects on treatment outcome were reported for gender, income and physical comorbidities. For a large majority of factors evidence was mixed or inconclusive. Further studies are required to identify factors affecting psychological treatment outcomes, which will be important for the development of personalised treatment approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 102463"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000849/pdfft?md5=d569d3838c31605eb17df77a601287c4&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824000849-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of treatment outcome of psychological therapies for common mental health problems (CMHP) in older adults: A systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Schmidt ,&nbsp;Nick Grey ,&nbsp;Clara Strauss ,&nbsp;Darya Gaysina\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Identifying factors that impact psychological treatment outcomes in older people with common mental health problems (CMHP) has important implications for supporting healthier and longer lives. The aim of the present study was to synthesise the evidence on predictors of psychological treatment outcomes in older people (aged 65+). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO were searched and 3929 articles were identified and screened, with 42 studies (<em>N</em> = 7978, <em>M</em> age = 68.9, <em>SD</em> age = 2.85) included: depression: k = 21, anxiety: k = 11, panic disorder: k = 3, mixed anxiety &amp; depression: k = 3, PTSD: k = 2, various CMHP: k = 2, with CBT being the most common treatment (71%). The review identified 28 factors reported as significant predictors of treatment outcome in at least one study, across different domains: psychosocial (<em>n</em> = 9), clinical (<em>n</em> = 6), treatment-related (<em>n</em> = 6), socio-demographic (<em>n</em> = 4), neurobiological (<em>n</em> = 3). Homework completion was the most consistent predictor of positive treatment outcome. Baseline symptom severity was the most frequently studied significant predictor and across all conditions, with higher baseline symptom severity largely linked to worse treatment outcomes. No significant effects on treatment outcome were reported for gender, income and physical comorbidities. For a large majority of factors evidence was mixed or inconclusive. Further studies are required to identify factors affecting psychological treatment outcomes, which will be important for the development of personalised treatment approaches.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000849/pdfft?md5=d569d3838c31605eb17df77a601287c4&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824000849-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000849\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000849","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

找出影响有常见心理健康问题(CMHP)的老年人的心理治疗效果的因素,对于帮助他们更健康、更长寿具有重要意义。本研究旨在综合老年人(65 岁以上)心理治疗效果预测因素的相关证据。本研究对 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 PsycINFO 进行了检索,确定并筛选了 3929 篇文章,其中包括 42 项研究(N = 7978,M 年龄 = 68.9,SD 年龄 = 2.85):抑郁症:k = 21,焦虑症:k = 11,恐慌症:k = 3,混合焦虑症和抑郁症:k = 3,创伤后应激障碍:k = 2,各种 CMHP:k = 2,其中 CBT 是最常见的治疗方法(71%)。综述发现,至少有一项研究将 28 个因素作为治疗结果的重要预测因素,这些因素涉及不同领域:社会心理因素(9 个)、临床因素(6 个)、治疗相关因素(6 个)、社会人口因素(4 个)和神经生物学因素(3 个)。完成家庭作业是预测积极治疗结果最一致的因素。基线症状严重程度是最常被研究的重要预测因素,在所有情况下都是如此,基线症状严重程度越高,治疗效果越差。性别、收入和身体合并症对治疗效果没有明显影响。对于大多数因素,证据不一或没有定论。需要进一步研究以确定影响心理治疗效果的因素,这对开发个性化治疗方法非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of treatment outcome of psychological therapies for common mental health problems (CMHP) in older adults: A systematic literature review

Identifying factors that impact psychological treatment outcomes in older people with common mental health problems (CMHP) has important implications for supporting healthier and longer lives. The aim of the present study was to synthesise the evidence on predictors of psychological treatment outcomes in older people (aged 65+). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO were searched and 3929 articles were identified and screened, with 42 studies (N = 7978, M age = 68.9, SD age = 2.85) included: depression: k = 21, anxiety: k = 11, panic disorder: k = 3, mixed anxiety & depression: k = 3, PTSD: k = 2, various CMHP: k = 2, with CBT being the most common treatment (71%). The review identified 28 factors reported as significant predictors of treatment outcome in at least one study, across different domains: psychosocial (n = 9), clinical (n = 6), treatment-related (n = 6), socio-demographic (n = 4), neurobiological (n = 3). Homework completion was the most consistent predictor of positive treatment outcome. Baseline symptom severity was the most frequently studied significant predictor and across all conditions, with higher baseline symptom severity largely linked to worse treatment outcomes. No significant effects on treatment outcome were reported for gender, income and physical comorbidities. For a large majority of factors evidence was mixed or inconclusive. Further studies are required to identify factors affecting psychological treatment outcomes, which will be important for the development of personalised treatment approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board How a strong measurement validity review can go astray: A look at Higgins et al. (2024) and recommendations for future measurement-focused reviews Are digital psychological interventions for psychological distress and quality of life in cancer patients effective? A systematic review and network meta-analysis The impact of interventions for depression on self-perceptions in young people: A systematic review & meta-analysis Corrigendum to “Network meta-analysis examining efficacy of components of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia’ [Clinical Psychology Review 114 (2024) 102507].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1