人工智能还是护理专业学生?重新审视连接词中的线索。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001696
Miriam R Bowers Abbott, Wyatt W Abbott
{"title":"人工智能还是护理专业学生?重新审视连接词中的线索。","authors":"Miriam R Bowers Abbott, Wyatt W Abbott","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent research at a single-purpose nursing institution has suggested a means to authenticate student writing by distinguishing it from artificial intelligence (AI)-generated text through the detection of key terms.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose was to replicate and expand the research that identified key terms present in student writing but absent from AI-generated text.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 5 generative AI writing tools were fed prompts to collect 14 787 words. Using the Search function on word processing software, the frequency of the terms, because, since, so, then, thing, think , and too , was measured and compared against earlier published findings from AI and students.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The replication study was successful for the terms since, then, thing, think, and too.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measuring key term frequency may be a path to authenticate student writing. While no tool can provide certainty of original authorship, the absence of key terms in a student submission may suggest AI authorship.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence or Nursing Student? Revisiting Clues in the Connectives.\",\"authors\":\"Miriam R Bowers Abbott, Wyatt W Abbott\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent research at a single-purpose nursing institution has suggested a means to authenticate student writing by distinguishing it from artificial intelligence (AI)-generated text through the detection of key terms.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose was to replicate and expand the research that identified key terms present in student writing but absent from AI-generated text.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 5 generative AI writing tools were fed prompts to collect 14 787 words. Using the Search function on word processing software, the frequency of the terms, because, since, so, then, thing, think , and too , was measured and compared against earlier published findings from AI and students.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The replication study was successful for the terms since, then, thing, think, and too.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measuring key term frequency may be a path to authenticate student writing. While no tool can provide certainty of original authorship, the absence of key terms in a student submission may suggest AI authorship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001696\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近在一家单一目的护理机构进行的研究提出了一种方法,通过检测关键术语将学生写作与人工智能(AI)生成的文本区分开来,从而鉴定学生写作的真伪:方法:共向 5 个人工智能生成的写作工具提供提示,收集了 14 787 个单词。使用文字处理软件的搜索功能,测量了 "因为"、"因为"、"所以"、"那么"、"事情"、"认为 "和 "也 "等词语的出现频率,并将其与人工智能和学生早期发表的研究结果进行了比较:结果:对 "因为"、"那么"、"事情"、"认为 "和 "也 "等词的复制研究取得了成功:测量关键词语的使用频率可能是鉴定学生写作的一条途径。虽然没有任何工具可以确定作者是原创者,但如果学生提交的文章中没有关键术语,则可能表明作者是人工智能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial Intelligence or Nursing Student? Revisiting Clues in the Connectives.

Background: Recent research at a single-purpose nursing institution has suggested a means to authenticate student writing by distinguishing it from artificial intelligence (AI)-generated text through the detection of key terms.

Purpose: The purpose was to replicate and expand the research that identified key terms present in student writing but absent from AI-generated text.

Methods: A total of 5 generative AI writing tools were fed prompts to collect 14 787 words. Using the Search function on word processing software, the frequency of the terms, because, since, so, then, thing, think , and too , was measured and compared against earlier published findings from AI and students.

Results: The replication study was successful for the terms since, then, thing, think, and too.

Conclusions: Measuring key term frequency may be a path to authenticate student writing. While no tool can provide certainty of original authorship, the absence of key terms in a student submission may suggest AI authorship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1