层状陶瓷弹道性能的实验和数值研究

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL International Journal of Impact Engineering Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.105032
Metehan Cura , Hamed Tanabi , Baris Sabuncuoglu
{"title":"层状陶瓷弹道性能的实验和数值研究","authors":"Metehan Cura ,&nbsp;Hamed Tanabi ,&nbsp;Baris Sabuncuoglu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.105032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ballistic performances of laminated ceramics were investigated experimentally and numerically and then compared with monolithic ceramics. Sixteen ceramic configurations were generated using two geometry types (hexagonal and square) and combination of three ceramic materials (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3,</sub> SiC, and B<sub>4</sub>C). Depth of Penetration ballistic tests were employed to evaluate their ballistic performance. According to the results, monolithic ceramic has higher ballistic performance than all laminated ceramic combinations. In laminated ceramics, using thicker ceramic on the strike-face increases the ballistic efficiency more than using it on the backing face. In addition, when a backing-face ceramic is combined with a more efficient strike-face ceramic, the ballistic performance is better than combination of same ceramic material. Lastly, finite element analysis were performed to simulate some of the tested configurations having SiC ceramic type. A similar trend was observed between the simulations and the tests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50318,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental and numerical study on the ballistic performance of laminated ceramics\",\"authors\":\"Metehan Cura ,&nbsp;Hamed Tanabi ,&nbsp;Baris Sabuncuoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.105032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The ballistic performances of laminated ceramics were investigated experimentally and numerically and then compared with monolithic ceramics. Sixteen ceramic configurations were generated using two geometry types (hexagonal and square) and combination of three ceramic materials (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3,</sub> SiC, and B<sub>4</sub>C). Depth of Penetration ballistic tests were employed to evaluate their ballistic performance. According to the results, monolithic ceramic has higher ballistic performance than all laminated ceramic combinations. In laminated ceramics, using thicker ceramic on the strike-face increases the ballistic efficiency more than using it on the backing face. In addition, when a backing-face ceramic is combined with a more efficient strike-face ceramic, the ballistic performance is better than combination of same ceramic material. Lastly, finite element analysis were performed to simulate some of the tested configurations having SiC ceramic type. A similar trend was observed between the simulations and the tests.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Impact Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Impact Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X24001568\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X24001568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实验和数值研究了层状陶瓷的弹道性能,并将其与整体陶瓷进行了比较。利用两种几何类型(六边形和方形)和三种陶瓷材料(Al2O3、SiC 和 B4C)的组合生成了十六种陶瓷构型。采用穿透深度弹道测试来评估它们的弹道性能。结果表明,整体陶瓷的弹道性能高于所有层状陶瓷组合。在层压陶瓷中,在打击面使用较厚的陶瓷比在背衬面使用较厚的陶瓷更能提高弹道效率。此外,当底面陶瓷与效率更高的打击面陶瓷组合在一起时,其弹道性能要优于相同陶瓷材料的组合。最后,我们还进行了有限元分析,模拟了一些使用碳化硅陶瓷的测试配置。模拟结果与测试结果呈类似趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental and numerical study on the ballistic performance of laminated ceramics

The ballistic performances of laminated ceramics were investigated experimentally and numerically and then compared with monolithic ceramics. Sixteen ceramic configurations were generated using two geometry types (hexagonal and square) and combination of three ceramic materials (Al2O3, SiC, and B4C). Depth of Penetration ballistic tests were employed to evaluate their ballistic performance. According to the results, monolithic ceramic has higher ballistic performance than all laminated ceramic combinations. In laminated ceramics, using thicker ceramic on the strike-face increases the ballistic efficiency more than using it on the backing face. In addition, when a backing-face ceramic is combined with a more efficient strike-face ceramic, the ballistic performance is better than combination of same ceramic material. Lastly, finite element analysis were performed to simulate some of the tested configurations having SiC ceramic type. A similar trend was observed between the simulations and the tests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Impact Engineering
International Journal of Impact Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.70%
发文量
241
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Impact Engineering, established in 1983 publishes original research findings related to the response of structures, components and materials subjected to impact, blast and high-rate loading. Areas relevant to the journal encompass the following general topics and those associated with them: -Behaviour and failure of structures and materials under impact and blast loading -Systems for protection and absorption of impact and blast loading -Terminal ballistics -Dynamic behaviour and failure of materials including plasticity and fracture -Stress waves -Structural crashworthiness -High-rate mechanical and forming processes -Impact, blast and high-rate loading/measurement techniques and their applications
期刊最新文献
Crack arrest characteristics and dynamic fracture parameters of moving cracks encountering double holes under impact loads Performance assessment of an innovative light and compact dust shield for DISC onboard Comet Interceptor/ESA space probes Analysis and evaluation of suitability of high-pressure dynamic constitutive model for concrete under blast and impact loading Dynamic failures at the metal-glass interface under impact loading Comparative investigation of shock pressure, shock duration, pressure decay time, and elastic energy of both porous gelatin and pure gelatin in shock state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1