局部阑尾癌切除边缘阳性的风险因素及其对生存的影响:国家癌症数据库分析

Ekaterina Baron, Chih Ching Wu, Andrei Nikiforchin, Raquel Abengozar Mingorance, Stephanie C. Carr, Jessica A. Wernberg, Rohit Sharma
{"title":"局部阑尾癌切除边缘阳性的风险因素及其对生存的影响:国家癌症数据库分析","authors":"Ekaterina Baron,&nbsp;Chih Ching Wu,&nbsp;Andrei Nikiforchin,&nbsp;Raquel Abengozar Mingorance,&nbsp;Stephanie C. Carr,&nbsp;Jessica A. Wernberg,&nbsp;Rohit Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The impact of a positive resection margin (RM+) in appendiceal cancer (AC) remains unclear, with small studies suggesting it does not worsen survival in low-grade subtypes. We aimed to evaluate RM+ rates, its risk factors, and survival outcomes across different AC histologies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database (2004–2019) and including stage I-III AC cases. Surgical and survival outcomes were compared between RM+ and RM- groups, with logistic regression analyzing the association of RM+ and its predictors. Subgroup analysis was performed for low/high tumor grade (LG/HG), mucinous/non-mucinous pathology (MAC/NMAC), and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 6800 patients identified, 737 (10.8 %) had RM+, while 6063 (89.2 %) had RM-. RM+ rates varied across AC histologies: 10.9 % in LG-MAC, 17.0 % in HG-MAC, 7.8 % in LG-NMAC, 13.9 % in HG-NMAC, and 17.9 % in SRC. RM+ correlated with significantly worse survival in LG-MAC (HR 1.67), HG-MAC (HR 1.83), LG-NMAC (HR 2.04), and SRC (HR 2.37) but not in HG-NMAC after adjusting to other factors. Predictors of RM+ included pT stage, preoperative chemotherapy in LG tumors and pT stage and positive lymph nodes in HG tumors whereas more extensive resection was associated with RM- in both LG and HG.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>RM+ worsens survival in most AC subtypes, highlighting the importance of achieving negative margins. Extensive resection, like right hemicolectomy, can improve RM- rate, but factors such as pT stage, lymph node status, and preoperative chemotherapy also affect RM+. Surgeons should prioritize achieving RM- in all AC histologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000811/pdfft?md5=bea5968875967fb0b29097f4858ba440&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024000811-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors of a positive resection margin in locoregional appendix cancer and its impact on survival: The national cancer database analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ekaterina Baron,&nbsp;Chih Ching Wu,&nbsp;Andrei Nikiforchin,&nbsp;Raquel Abengozar Mingorance,&nbsp;Stephanie C. Carr,&nbsp;Jessica A. Wernberg,&nbsp;Rohit Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The impact of a positive resection margin (RM+) in appendiceal cancer (AC) remains unclear, with small studies suggesting it does not worsen survival in low-grade subtypes. We aimed to evaluate RM+ rates, its risk factors, and survival outcomes across different AC histologies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database (2004–2019) and including stage I-III AC cases. Surgical and survival outcomes were compared between RM+ and RM- groups, with logistic regression analyzing the association of RM+ and its predictors. Subgroup analysis was performed for low/high tumor grade (LG/HG), mucinous/non-mucinous pathology (MAC/NMAC), and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 6800 patients identified, 737 (10.8 %) had RM+, while 6063 (89.2 %) had RM-. RM+ rates varied across AC histologies: 10.9 % in LG-MAC, 17.0 % in HG-MAC, 7.8 % in LG-NMAC, 13.9 % in HG-NMAC, and 17.9 % in SRC. RM+ correlated with significantly worse survival in LG-MAC (HR 1.67), HG-MAC (HR 1.83), LG-NMAC (HR 2.04), and SRC (HR 2.37) but not in HG-NMAC after adjusting to other factors. Predictors of RM+ included pT stage, preoperative chemotherapy in LG tumors and pT stage and positive lymph nodes in HG tumors whereas more extensive resection was associated with RM- in both LG and HG.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>RM+ worsens survival in most AC subtypes, highlighting the importance of achieving negative margins. Extensive resection, like right hemicolectomy, can improve RM- rate, but factors such as pT stage, lymph node status, and preoperative chemotherapy also affect RM+. Surgeons should prioritize achieving RM- in all AC histologies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Oncology Insight\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000811/pdfft?md5=bea5968875967fb0b29097f4858ba440&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024000811-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Oncology Insight\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000811\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言切除边缘阳性(RM+)对阑尾癌(AC)的影响仍不明确,一些小型研究表明它不会恶化低级别亚型的生存率。我们利用全国癌症数据库(2004-2019 年)开展了一项多中心回顾性队列研究,其中包括 I-III 期阑尾癌病例。比较了RM+组和RM-组的手术和生存结果,并通过逻辑回归分析了RM+与其预测因素的关联。对低/高肿瘤分级(LG/HG)、粘液性/非粘液性病理(MAC/NMAC)和标志环细胞癌(SRC)进行了亚组分析。结果在6800例已确定的患者中,737例(10.8%)为RM+,6063例(89.2%)为RM-。不同组织学的 AC RM+ 率各不相同:LG-MAC为10.9%,HG-MAC为17.0%,LG-NMAC为7.8%,HG-NMAC为13.9%,SRC为17.9%。在 LG-MAC(HR 1.67)、HG-MAC(HR 1.83)、LG-NMAC(HR 2.04)和 SRC(HR 2.37)中,RM+ 与明显较差的存活率相关,但在调整其他因素后,在 HG-NMAC 中则不相关。RM+的预测因素包括LG肿瘤的pT分期和术前化疗,以及HG肿瘤的pT分期和淋巴结阳性,而在LG和HG中,更广泛的切除与RM-有关。广泛切除(如右半结肠切除术)可提高RM-率,但pT分期、淋巴结状态和术前化疗等因素也会影响RM+。外科医生应优先考虑在所有 AC 组织学中实现 RM-。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk factors of a positive resection margin in locoregional appendix cancer and its impact on survival: The national cancer database analysis

Introduction

The impact of a positive resection margin (RM+) in appendiceal cancer (AC) remains unclear, with small studies suggesting it does not worsen survival in low-grade subtypes. We aimed to evaluate RM+ rates, its risk factors, and survival outcomes across different AC histologies.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database (2004–2019) and including stage I-III AC cases. Surgical and survival outcomes were compared between RM+ and RM- groups, with logistic regression analyzing the association of RM+ and its predictors. Subgroup analysis was performed for low/high tumor grade (LG/HG), mucinous/non-mucinous pathology (MAC/NMAC), and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC).

Results

Among 6800 patients identified, 737 (10.8 %) had RM+, while 6063 (89.2 %) had RM-. RM+ rates varied across AC histologies: 10.9 % in LG-MAC, 17.0 % in HG-MAC, 7.8 % in LG-NMAC, 13.9 % in HG-NMAC, and 17.9 % in SRC. RM+ correlated with significantly worse survival in LG-MAC (HR 1.67), HG-MAC (HR 1.83), LG-NMAC (HR 2.04), and SRC (HR 2.37) but not in HG-NMAC after adjusting to other factors. Predictors of RM+ included pT stage, preoperative chemotherapy in LG tumors and pT stage and positive lymph nodes in HG tumors whereas more extensive resection was associated with RM- in both LG and HG.

Conclusion

RM+ worsens survival in most AC subtypes, highlighting the importance of achieving negative margins. Extensive resection, like right hemicolectomy, can improve RM- rate, but factors such as pT stage, lymph node status, and preoperative chemotherapy also affect RM+. Surgeons should prioritize achieving RM- in all AC histologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combining liver-directed and immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A review and future directions Timing of breast biopsy and axillary ultrasound does not affect the false positive rate of the axillary ultrasound Small bowel cancers: A population-based analysis of epidemiology, treatment and outcomes in Ontario, Canada from 2005-2020 Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Prehabilitation (PrePFPT) for the prevention of low anterior resection syndrome Pepsinogen and Helicobacter pylori: Serum biomarkers for gastric cancer risk in a diverse United States population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1