在资源有限的环境中,医疗保健专业人员使用移动医疗应用程序报告药物不良反应的意愿:数字医疗的投入,2023 年

Abiy Tasew Dubale , Abiyu Abadi Tareke , Fikadu Wake Butta , Adamu Ambachew Shibabaw , Ermias Bekele Eniyew , Mohammedjud Hassen Ahmed , Sisay Yitayih Kassie , Addisalem Workie Demsash , Alex Ayenew Chereka , Geleta Nenko Dube , Agmasie Damtew Walle , Gemeda Wakgari Kitil
{"title":"在资源有限的环境中,医疗保健专业人员使用移动医疗应用程序报告药物不良反应的意愿:数字医疗的投入,2023 年","authors":"Abiy Tasew Dubale ,&nbsp;Abiyu Abadi Tareke ,&nbsp;Fikadu Wake Butta ,&nbsp;Adamu Ambachew Shibabaw ,&nbsp;Ermias Bekele Eniyew ,&nbsp;Mohammedjud Hassen Ahmed ,&nbsp;Sisay Yitayih Kassie ,&nbsp;Addisalem Workie Demsash ,&nbsp;Alex Ayenew Chereka ,&nbsp;Geleta Nenko Dube ,&nbsp;Agmasie Damtew Walle ,&nbsp;Gemeda Wakgari Kitil","doi":"10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a significant public health concern, particularly in limited resource settings where underreporting is prevalent due to various challenges. Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) offer a promising solution to enhance pharmacovigilance by facilitating easier and more efficient ADR reporting. However, despite the increasing availability and use of mHealth apps, there is a lack of evidence on healthcare professionals' willingness to adopt them for ADR reporting in resource-constrained environments. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the willingness of healthcare professionals in Ethiopia to utilize mobile health applications for adverse drug reaction reporting and identify associated factors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We carried out a cross-sectional study involving 422 healthcare professionals working in institutional settings. We gathered data through a pretested questionnaire that participants completed themselves. We inputted the data using Epi Data V.4.6 and analyzed it using SPSS V.26. Our analysis involved conducting multivariable logistic regression to identify the factors influencing the likelihood of healthcare professionals using mobile applications to report adverse drug reactions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study involved 389 healthcare professionals. Approximately 301 (77.4 %) of them expressed willingness to utilize mobile applications for reporting adverse drug reactions. The willingness to utilize mobile applications was significantly associated with the type of mobile phone (smart: AOR 3.56; 95 % CI 2.15–5.67), basic computer training (AOR 4.43; 95 % CI 2.27–8.64), mobile health-related training (AOR 1.96; 95 % CI 1.01–3.79), attitude (AOR 4.01; 95 % CI 2.19–7.35), perceived ease of use (AOR 2.91; 95 % CI 1.59–5.23), and perceived usefulness (AOR 2.10; 95 % CI 1.15–3.85).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overall, there was a high proportion of healthcare professionals willing to use mobile devices for reporting drug adverse reactions. Their willingness correlated with factors such as the type of mobile phone, perceived ease of use, attitude, training, and perceived usefulness of mobile applications. With the increasing use of smartphones, motivation among healthcare professionals is rising. Basic computer and mHealth-related training are crucial for enhancing the acceptability of such applications and should be incorporated into future implementations. Taking these factors into account could offer insights into the design and implementation of mobile applications for adverse drug reactions in Ethiopia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37085,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161324000449/pdfft?md5=365420b190e9ac0bbaeeba9aecf522ca&pid=1-s2.0-S2590161324000449-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare professionals' willingness to utilize a mobile health application for adverse drug reaction reporting in a limited resource setting: An input for digital health, 2023\",\"authors\":\"Abiy Tasew Dubale ,&nbsp;Abiyu Abadi Tareke ,&nbsp;Fikadu Wake Butta ,&nbsp;Adamu Ambachew Shibabaw ,&nbsp;Ermias Bekele Eniyew ,&nbsp;Mohammedjud Hassen Ahmed ,&nbsp;Sisay Yitayih Kassie ,&nbsp;Addisalem Workie Demsash ,&nbsp;Alex Ayenew Chereka ,&nbsp;Geleta Nenko Dube ,&nbsp;Agmasie Damtew Walle ,&nbsp;Gemeda Wakgari Kitil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a significant public health concern, particularly in limited resource settings where underreporting is prevalent due to various challenges. Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) offer a promising solution to enhance pharmacovigilance by facilitating easier and more efficient ADR reporting. However, despite the increasing availability and use of mHealth apps, there is a lack of evidence on healthcare professionals' willingness to adopt them for ADR reporting in resource-constrained environments. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the willingness of healthcare professionals in Ethiopia to utilize mobile health applications for adverse drug reaction reporting and identify associated factors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We carried out a cross-sectional study involving 422 healthcare professionals working in institutional settings. We gathered data through a pretested questionnaire that participants completed themselves. We inputted the data using Epi Data V.4.6 and analyzed it using SPSS V.26. Our analysis involved conducting multivariable logistic regression to identify the factors influencing the likelihood of healthcare professionals using mobile applications to report adverse drug reactions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study involved 389 healthcare professionals. Approximately 301 (77.4 %) of them expressed willingness to utilize mobile applications for reporting adverse drug reactions. The willingness to utilize mobile applications was significantly associated with the type of mobile phone (smart: AOR 3.56; 95 % CI 2.15–5.67), basic computer training (AOR 4.43; 95 % CI 2.27–8.64), mobile health-related training (AOR 1.96; 95 % CI 1.01–3.79), attitude (AOR 4.01; 95 % CI 2.19–7.35), perceived ease of use (AOR 2.91; 95 % CI 1.59–5.23), and perceived usefulness (AOR 2.10; 95 % CI 1.15–3.85).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overall, there was a high proportion of healthcare professionals willing to use mobile devices for reporting drug adverse reactions. Their willingness correlated with factors such as the type of mobile phone, perceived ease of use, attitude, training, and perceived usefulness of mobile applications. With the increasing use of smartphones, motivation among healthcare professionals is rising. Basic computer and mHealth-related training are crucial for enhancing the acceptability of such applications and should be incorporated into future implementations. Taking these factors into account could offer insights into the design and implementation of mobile applications for adverse drug reactions in Ethiopia.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161324000449/pdfft?md5=365420b190e9ac0bbaeeba9aecf522ca&pid=1-s2.0-S2590161324000449-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161324000449\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161324000449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景药物不良反应(ADRs)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,尤其是在资源有限的环境中,由于各种挑战,报告不足的现象十分普遍。移动医疗应用程序(mHealth apps)为药物不良反应报告提供了更便捷、更高效的途径,从而为加强药物警戒提供了一个前景广阔的解决方案。然而,尽管移动医疗应用程序的可用性和使用率越来越高,但在资源有限的环境中,医护人员是否愿意采用这些应用程序来报告 ADR 还缺乏证据。因此,本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚医疗保健专业人员利用移动医疗应用程序报告药物不良反应的意愿,并确定相关因素。方法我们开展了一项横断面研究,涉及 422 名在机构环境中工作的医疗保健专业人员。我们通过参与者自行填写的预试问卷收集数据。我们使用 Epi Data V.4.6 输入数据,并使用 SPSS V.26 进行分析。我们的分析包括进行多变量逻辑回归,以确定影响医护人员使用移动应用程序报告药物不良反应可能性的因素。其中约 301 人(77.4%)表示愿意使用移动应用程序报告药物不良反应。使用移动应用程序的意愿与手机类型(智能手机:AOR 3.56;95 % CI 2.15-5.67)、计算机基础培训(AOR 4.43;95 % CI 2.27-8.64)、移动健康相关培训(AOR 1.96;95 % CI 1.01-3.79)、态度(AOR 4.结论总体而言,愿意使用移动设备报告药物不良反应的医护人员比例较高。他们的意愿与手机类型、感知的易用性、态度、培训和感知的移动应用有用性等因素相关。随着智能手机的使用越来越多,医护人员的积极性也在不断提高。基本的计算机和移动医疗相关培训对于提高此类应用的可接受性至关重要,应纳入未来的实施中。考虑到这些因素,可以为埃塞俄比亚药品不良反应移动应用的设计和实施提供启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Healthcare professionals' willingness to utilize a mobile health application for adverse drug reaction reporting in a limited resource setting: An input for digital health, 2023

Background

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a significant public health concern, particularly in limited resource settings where underreporting is prevalent due to various challenges. Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) offer a promising solution to enhance pharmacovigilance by facilitating easier and more efficient ADR reporting. However, despite the increasing availability and use of mHealth apps, there is a lack of evidence on healthcare professionals' willingness to adopt them for ADR reporting in resource-constrained environments. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the willingness of healthcare professionals in Ethiopia to utilize mobile health applications for adverse drug reaction reporting and identify associated factors.

Methods

We carried out a cross-sectional study involving 422 healthcare professionals working in institutional settings. We gathered data through a pretested questionnaire that participants completed themselves. We inputted the data using Epi Data V.4.6 and analyzed it using SPSS V.26. Our analysis involved conducting multivariable logistic regression to identify the factors influencing the likelihood of healthcare professionals using mobile applications to report adverse drug reactions.

Results

The study involved 389 healthcare professionals. Approximately 301 (77.4 %) of them expressed willingness to utilize mobile applications for reporting adverse drug reactions. The willingness to utilize mobile applications was significantly associated with the type of mobile phone (smart: AOR 3.56; 95 % CI 2.15–5.67), basic computer training (AOR 4.43; 95 % CI 2.27–8.64), mobile health-related training (AOR 1.96; 95 % CI 1.01–3.79), attitude (AOR 4.01; 95 % CI 2.19–7.35), perceived ease of use (AOR 2.91; 95 % CI 1.59–5.23), and perceived usefulness (AOR 2.10; 95 % CI 1.15–3.85).

Conclusions

Overall, there was a high proportion of healthcare professionals willing to use mobile devices for reporting drug adverse reactions. Their willingness correlated with factors such as the type of mobile phone, perceived ease of use, attitude, training, and perceived usefulness of mobile applications. With the increasing use of smartphones, motivation among healthcare professionals is rising. Basic computer and mHealth-related training are crucial for enhancing the acceptability of such applications and should be incorporated into future implementations. Taking these factors into account could offer insights into the design and implementation of mobile applications for adverse drug reactions in Ethiopia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Foeto–Maternal outcomes of pregnancies beyond 41 weeks of gestation after induced or spontaneous labour Editorial Board Epidemiology and placental pathology of intrauterine fetal demise in a tertiary hospital in the Philippines Perinatal outcomes in indian women with Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome (APS): Five year experience from a tertiary care centre Postmortem fertilization: New Italian government guidelines affirm the legitimacy of this procedure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1