优化垃圾渗滤液处理,实现环境和经济可持续性:对 300 多个城市进行自下而上研究的启示

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Sustainable Production and Consumption Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.spc.2024.06.027
Qian-long Han , Hai-long Zhao , Guo-xia Wei , Han-qiao Liu , Yu-wen Zhu , Tong Li , Yan-fei Lin , Xin-rui Su
{"title":"优化垃圾渗滤液处理,实现环境和经济可持续性:对 300 多个城市进行自下而上研究的启示","authors":"Qian-long Han ,&nbsp;Hai-long Zhao ,&nbsp;Guo-xia Wei ,&nbsp;Han-qiao Liu ,&nbsp;Yu-wen Zhu ,&nbsp;Tong Li ,&nbsp;Yan-fei Lin ,&nbsp;Xin-rui Su","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2024.06.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Municipal waste incineration in China reached 232 million tonnes in 2022, with increasing problems in treating waste leachate (WL). However, significant uncertainty exists in the emission performances, cost, and optimization strategies of city-level WL treatment. Herein, a bottom-up approach is utilized to investigate the WL status across over 300 cities and a life cycle thinking is employed to compare the environmental and economic effects of various WL and waste leachate concentrate (WLC) management options. Analysis reveals national production of WL has reached 57 million tonnes, with the top ten cities, including Guangzhou, Shanghai, and Chongqing, contributing 20.6 %. Biological coupled chemical treatment (BCT) demonstrates the best environmental performances in WL treatment technologies, while biologically coupled membrane treatment (BMT) offers the lowest economic expenses, and Mechanical Vapor Recompression (MVR) evaporation excels in treating WLC. In a business-as-usual scenario, the national carbon emissions, energy consumption, and economic costs of WL treatment are 24 million tonnes CO<sub>2</sub> eq, 264 million GJ, and RMB 19 billion, respectively. Under the WL and WLC technology optimization scenarios, estimations indicate a reduction in carbon emissions by 80.7 % (equivalent to 55.1 million trees) and 19.7 % (equivalent to 13.5 million trees), respectively. Viewed holistically, replacing BMT with BCT emerges as the optimal mitigation strategy, with the synergistic optimization of BMT and MVR evaporation systems following closely. In the formulation of the technology transition strategies, the urban economy, strategic positioning, and geographic location also should be considered apart from the technological aspects, to steadily achieve sustainable co-benefits across environmental and economic dimensions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing waste leachate treatment for environmental and economic sustainability: Insights from a bottom-up study of over 300 cities\",\"authors\":\"Qian-long Han ,&nbsp;Hai-long Zhao ,&nbsp;Guo-xia Wei ,&nbsp;Han-qiao Liu ,&nbsp;Yu-wen Zhu ,&nbsp;Tong Li ,&nbsp;Yan-fei Lin ,&nbsp;Xin-rui Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spc.2024.06.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Municipal waste incineration in China reached 232 million tonnes in 2022, with increasing problems in treating waste leachate (WL). However, significant uncertainty exists in the emission performances, cost, and optimization strategies of city-level WL treatment. Herein, a bottom-up approach is utilized to investigate the WL status across over 300 cities and a life cycle thinking is employed to compare the environmental and economic effects of various WL and waste leachate concentrate (WLC) management options. Analysis reveals national production of WL has reached 57 million tonnes, with the top ten cities, including Guangzhou, Shanghai, and Chongqing, contributing 20.6 %. Biological coupled chemical treatment (BCT) demonstrates the best environmental performances in WL treatment technologies, while biologically coupled membrane treatment (BMT) offers the lowest economic expenses, and Mechanical Vapor Recompression (MVR) evaporation excels in treating WLC. In a business-as-usual scenario, the national carbon emissions, energy consumption, and economic costs of WL treatment are 24 million tonnes CO<sub>2</sub> eq, 264 million GJ, and RMB 19 billion, respectively. Under the WL and WLC technology optimization scenarios, estimations indicate a reduction in carbon emissions by 80.7 % (equivalent to 55.1 million trees) and 19.7 % (equivalent to 13.5 million trees), respectively. Viewed holistically, replacing BMT with BCT emerges as the optimal mitigation strategy, with the synergistic optimization of BMT and MVR evaporation systems following closely. In the formulation of the technology transition strategies, the urban economy, strategic positioning, and geographic location also should be considered apart from the technological aspects, to steadily achieve sustainable co-benefits across environmental and economic dimensions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Production and Consumption\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Production and Consumption\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924001878\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924001878","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022 年,中国城市垃圾焚烧量达到 2.32 亿吨,垃圾渗滤液(WL)处理问题日益突出。然而,城市级垃圾渗滤液处理的排放性能、成本和优化策略还存在很大的不确定性。本文采用自下而上的方法调查了 300 多个城市的垃圾渗滤液现状,并运用生命周期思维比较了各种垃圾渗滤液和垃圾渗滤液浓缩物(WLC)管理方案对环境和经济的影响。分析结果表明,全国垃圾渗滤液产量已达 5700 万吨,其中广州、上海和重庆等十大城市占 20.6%。在 WL 处理技术中,生物耦合化学处理(BCT)的环保性能最佳,而生物耦合膜处理(BMT)的经济成本最低,机械蒸汽再压缩(MVR)蒸发在处理 WLC 方面表现出色。在一切照旧的情况下,全国 WL 处理的碳排放量、能耗和经济成本分别为 2 400 万吨二氧化碳当量、2.64 亿吉焦和 190 亿元人民币。在 WL 和 WLC 技术优化情景下,估计碳排放量分别减少了 80.7%(相当于 5 510 万棵树)和 19.7%(相当于 1 350 万棵树)。从整体上看,用 BCT 取代 BMT 是最佳减排战略,BMT 和 MVR 蒸发系统的协同优化紧随其后。在制定技术过渡战略时,除了技术方面的因素外,还应考虑城市经济、战略定位和地理位置,以稳步实现环境和经济方面的可持续共同效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing waste leachate treatment for environmental and economic sustainability: Insights from a bottom-up study of over 300 cities

Municipal waste incineration in China reached 232 million tonnes in 2022, with increasing problems in treating waste leachate (WL). However, significant uncertainty exists in the emission performances, cost, and optimization strategies of city-level WL treatment. Herein, a bottom-up approach is utilized to investigate the WL status across over 300 cities and a life cycle thinking is employed to compare the environmental and economic effects of various WL and waste leachate concentrate (WLC) management options. Analysis reveals national production of WL has reached 57 million tonnes, with the top ten cities, including Guangzhou, Shanghai, and Chongqing, contributing 20.6 %. Biological coupled chemical treatment (BCT) demonstrates the best environmental performances in WL treatment technologies, while biologically coupled membrane treatment (BMT) offers the lowest economic expenses, and Mechanical Vapor Recompression (MVR) evaporation excels in treating WLC. In a business-as-usual scenario, the national carbon emissions, energy consumption, and economic costs of WL treatment are 24 million tonnes CO2 eq, 264 million GJ, and RMB 19 billion, respectively. Under the WL and WLC technology optimization scenarios, estimations indicate a reduction in carbon emissions by 80.7 % (equivalent to 55.1 million trees) and 19.7 % (equivalent to 13.5 million trees), respectively. Viewed holistically, replacing BMT with BCT emerges as the optimal mitigation strategy, with the synergistic optimization of BMT and MVR evaporation systems following closely. In the formulation of the technology transition strategies, the urban economy, strategic positioning, and geographic location also should be considered apart from the technological aspects, to steadily achieve sustainable co-benefits across environmental and economic dimensions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
期刊最新文献
Residential water choices: Assessing the willingness to adopt alternative water sources by examining risk perceptions and personal norms in Belgium Global nutrient content embedded in food losses and waste: Identifying the sources and magnitude along the food supply chain Global projections of plastic use, end-of-life fate and potential changes in consumption, reduction, recycling and replacement with bioplastics to 2050 What should be understood to promote environmentally sustainable diets? Transitioning towards circular households: Exploring influential factors and constraints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1