人工标注代码气味的规定程序

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Science of Computer Programming Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.scico.2024.103168
Simona Prokić, Nikola Luburić, Jelena Slivka, Aleksandar Kovačević
{"title":"人工标注代码气味的规定程序","authors":"Simona Prokić,&nbsp;Nikola Luburić,&nbsp;Jelena Slivka,&nbsp;Aleksandar Kovačević","doi":"10.1016/j.scico.2024.103168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>– Code smells are structures in code that present potential software maintainability issues. Manually constructing high-quality datasets to train ML models for code smell detection is challenging. Inconsistent annotations, small size, non-realistic smell-to-non-smell ratio, and poor smell coverage hinder the dataset quality. These issues arise mainly due to the time-consuming nature of manual annotation and annotators’ disagreements caused by ambiguous and vague smell definitions.</p><p>To address challenges related to building high-quality datasets suitable for training ML models for smell detection, we designed a prescriptive procedure for manual code smell annotation. The proposed procedure represents an extension of our previous work, aiming to support the annotation of any smell defined by Fowler. We validated the procedure by employing three annotators to annotate smells following the proposed annotation procedure.</p><p>The main contribution of this paper is a prescriptive annotation procedure that benefits the following stakeholders: annotators building high-quality smell datasets that can be used to train ML models, ML researchers building ML models for smell detection, and software engineers employing ML models to enhance the software maintainability. Secondary contributions are the code smell dataset containing Data Class, Feature Envy, and Refused Bequest, and DataSet Explorer tool which supports annotators during the annotation procedure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49561,"journal":{"name":"Science of Computer Programming","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 103168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescriptive procedure for manual code smell annotation\",\"authors\":\"Simona Prokić,&nbsp;Nikola Luburić,&nbsp;Jelena Slivka,&nbsp;Aleksandar Kovačević\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scico.2024.103168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>– Code smells are structures in code that present potential software maintainability issues. Manually constructing high-quality datasets to train ML models for code smell detection is challenging. Inconsistent annotations, small size, non-realistic smell-to-non-smell ratio, and poor smell coverage hinder the dataset quality. These issues arise mainly due to the time-consuming nature of manual annotation and annotators’ disagreements caused by ambiguous and vague smell definitions.</p><p>To address challenges related to building high-quality datasets suitable for training ML models for smell detection, we designed a prescriptive procedure for manual code smell annotation. The proposed procedure represents an extension of our previous work, aiming to support the annotation of any smell defined by Fowler. We validated the procedure by employing three annotators to annotate smells following the proposed annotation procedure.</p><p>The main contribution of this paper is a prescriptive annotation procedure that benefits the following stakeholders: annotators building high-quality smell datasets that can be used to train ML models, ML researchers building ML models for smell detection, and software engineers employing ML models to enhance the software maintainability. Secondary contributions are the code smell dataset containing Data Class, Feature Envy, and Refused Bequest, and DataSet Explorer tool which supports annotators during the annotation procedure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of Computer Programming\",\"volume\":\"238 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of Computer Programming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167642324000911\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Computer Programming","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167642324000911","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

- 代码气味是指代码中存在潜在软件可维护性问题的结构。手动构建高质量数据集来训练用于代码气味检测的 ML 模型是一项挑战。不一致的注释、较小的规模、非现实的气味与非气味比例以及较低的气味覆盖率都会影响数据集的质量。这些问题的出现主要是由于人工注释耗时以及注释者因气味定义模糊不清而产生分歧。为了解决与构建适合训练气味检测 ML 模型的高质量数据集相关的挑战,我们设计了一种用于人工代码气味注释的规范程序。所提出的程序是我们之前工作的延伸,旨在支持对 Fowler 定义的任何气味进行注释。本文的主要贡献是提出了一种规范性注释程序,它能为以下利益相关者带来益处:注释者建立了可用于训练 ML 模型的高质量气味数据集;ML 研究人员建立了用于气味检测的 ML 模型;软件工程师使用 ML 模型提高了软件的可维护性。该系统的主要贡献是包含数据类、特征嫉妒和拒绝请求的代码气味数据集,以及在注释过程中为注释者提供支持的数据集资源管理器工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prescriptive procedure for manual code smell annotation

– Code smells are structures in code that present potential software maintainability issues. Manually constructing high-quality datasets to train ML models for code smell detection is challenging. Inconsistent annotations, small size, non-realistic smell-to-non-smell ratio, and poor smell coverage hinder the dataset quality. These issues arise mainly due to the time-consuming nature of manual annotation and annotators’ disagreements caused by ambiguous and vague smell definitions.

To address challenges related to building high-quality datasets suitable for training ML models for smell detection, we designed a prescriptive procedure for manual code smell annotation. The proposed procedure represents an extension of our previous work, aiming to support the annotation of any smell defined by Fowler. We validated the procedure by employing three annotators to annotate smells following the proposed annotation procedure.

The main contribution of this paper is a prescriptive annotation procedure that benefits the following stakeholders: annotators building high-quality smell datasets that can be used to train ML models, ML researchers building ML models for smell detection, and software engineers employing ML models to enhance the software maintainability. Secondary contributions are the code smell dataset containing Data Class, Feature Envy, and Refused Bequest, and DataSet Explorer tool which supports annotators during the annotation procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science of Computer Programming
Science of Computer Programming 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Science of Computer Programming is dedicated to the distribution of research results in the areas of software systems development, use and maintenance, including the software aspects of hardware design. The journal has a wide scope ranging from the many facets of methodological foundations to the details of technical issues andthe aspects of industrial practice. The subjects of interest to SCP cover the entire spectrum of methods for the entire life cycle of software systems, including • Requirements, specification, design, validation, verification, coding, testing, maintenance, metrics and renovation of software; • Design, implementation and evaluation of programming languages; • Programming environments, development tools, visualisation and animation; • Management of the development process; • Human factors in software, software for social interaction, software for social computing; • Cyber physical systems, and software for the interaction between the physical and the machine; • Software aspects of infrastructure services, system administration, and network management.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Assessing the coverage of W-based conformance testing methods over code faults Analysis and formal specification of OpenJDK's BitSet: Proof files Parametric ontologies in formal software engineering CAN-Verify: Automated analysis for BDI agents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1