对 2 × 2 表中的多项式数据进行部分条件二项式精确分析

IF 0.9 4区 数学 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Statistics & Probability Letters Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1016/j.spl.2024.110195
Dennis D. Boos , Shannon Ari , Roger L. Berger
{"title":"对 2 × 2 表中的多项式数据进行部分条件二项式精确分析","authors":"Dennis D. Boos ,&nbsp;Shannon Ari ,&nbsp;Roger L. Berger","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2024.110195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Starting with Barnard (1945, 1947), many papers have shown that exact unconditional tests outperform Fisher’s Exact Test in 2 × 2 tables with independent binomial data. Less has been published about unconditional tests with multinomial data. However, in many multinomial 2 × 2 analyses, a binomial-like comparison of proportions is of interest rather than inference in terms of odds ratios. Thus, this paper proposes using a partially conditional binomial analysis with data that are actually multinomially distributed. This partially conditional analysis, conditioning on the row totals and then using the unconditional binomial analysis, is more powerful than the fully conditional Fisher’s Exact Test, has good power comparable to the fully unconditional multinomial analysis, and provides exact confidence intervals for the difference of proportions. Also, the partially conditional binomial analysis requires considerably less computation than the fully unconditional analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49475,"journal":{"name":"Statistics & Probability Letters","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 110195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exact partially conditional binomial analysis for multinomial data in 2 × 2 tables\",\"authors\":\"Dennis D. Boos ,&nbsp;Shannon Ari ,&nbsp;Roger L. Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spl.2024.110195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Starting with Barnard (1945, 1947), many papers have shown that exact unconditional tests outperform Fisher’s Exact Test in 2 × 2 tables with independent binomial data. Less has been published about unconditional tests with multinomial data. However, in many multinomial 2 × 2 analyses, a binomial-like comparison of proportions is of interest rather than inference in terms of odds ratios. Thus, this paper proposes using a partially conditional binomial analysis with data that are actually multinomially distributed. This partially conditional analysis, conditioning on the row totals and then using the unconditional binomial analysis, is more powerful than the fully conditional Fisher’s Exact Test, has good power comparable to the fully unconditional multinomial analysis, and provides exact confidence intervals for the difference of proportions. Also, the partially conditional binomial analysis requires considerably less computation than the fully unconditional analysis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistics & Probability Letters\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistics & Probability Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224001640\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics & Probability Letters","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224001640","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从 Barnard(1945 年,1947 年)开始,许多论文都表明,在独立二项式数据的 2 × 2 表中,精确无条件检验优于费雪精确检验。关于多项式数据的无条件检验的论文较少。然而,在许多多二项 2 × 2 分析中,人们感兴趣的是类似二项的比例比较,而不是几率比例的推断。因此,本文建议使用部分条件二项分析法,对实际为多二项分布的数据进行分析。这种部分条件分析是以行总数为条件,然后使用无条件二项分析,比完全条件费雪精确检验更强大,具有与完全无条件多项式分析相当的良好能力,并能为比例差异提供精确的置信区间。此外,与完全无条件分析相比,部分条件二叉分析所需的计算量要少得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exact partially conditional binomial analysis for multinomial data in 2 × 2 tables

Starting with Barnard (1945, 1947), many papers have shown that exact unconditional tests outperform Fisher’s Exact Test in 2 × 2 tables with independent binomial data. Less has been published about unconditional tests with multinomial data. However, in many multinomial 2 × 2 analyses, a binomial-like comparison of proportions is of interest rather than inference in terms of odds ratios. Thus, this paper proposes using a partially conditional binomial analysis with data that are actually multinomially distributed. This partially conditional analysis, conditioning on the row totals and then using the unconditional binomial analysis, is more powerful than the fully conditional Fisher’s Exact Test, has good power comparable to the fully unconditional multinomial analysis, and provides exact confidence intervals for the difference of proportions. Also, the partially conditional binomial analysis requires considerably less computation than the fully unconditional analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics & Probability Letters
Statistics & Probability Letters 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
173
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Statistics & Probability Letters adopts a novel and highly innovative approach to the publication of research findings in statistics and probability. It features concise articles, rapid publication and broad coverage of the statistics and probability literature. Statistics & Probability Letters is a refereed journal. Articles will be limited to six journal pages (13 double-space typed pages) including references and figures. Apart from the six-page limitation, originality, quality and clarity will be the criteria for choosing the material to be published in Statistics & Probability Letters. Every attempt will be made to provide the first review of a submitted manuscript within three months of submission. The proliferation of literature and long publication delays have made it difficult for researchers and practitioners to keep up with new developments outside of, or even within, their specialization. The aim of Statistics & Probability Letters is to help to alleviate this problem. Concise communications (letters) allow readers to quickly and easily digest large amounts of material and to stay up-to-date with developments in all areas of statistics and probability. The mainstream of Letters will focus on new statistical methods, theoretical results, and innovative applications of statistics and probability to other scientific disciplines. Key results and central ideas must be presented in a clear and concise manner. These results may be part of a larger study that the author will submit at a later time as a full length paper to SPL or to another journal. Theory and methodology may be published with proofs omitted, or only sketched, but only if sufficient support material is provided so that the findings can be verified. Empirical and computational results that are of significant value will be published.
期刊最新文献
Mean-field fractional BSDEs with locally monotone coefficients Poisson approximation and D(un) condition for extremes of transient random walks in random sceneries The asymptotic behaviors for branching α-stable process Logarithmic scale asymptotics for random walks with Weibull-like upper tail distributions A simple consensus model for an increasing population of agents with i.i.d incoming opinions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1