非甾体抗炎药对三种不同类型土壤中微生物群落的影响--实验室实验

Emoke Dalma Kovacs , Melinda Haydee Kovacs , Damia Barcelo , Pereira Paulo
{"title":"非甾体抗炎药对三种不同类型土壤中微生物群落的影响--实验室实验","authors":"Emoke Dalma Kovacs ,&nbsp;Melinda Haydee Kovacs ,&nbsp;Damia Barcelo ,&nbsp;Pereira Paulo","doi":"10.1016/j.cscee.2024.100833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Commonly used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can enter the soil via several routes. However, there have been relatively few studies on the impact of NSAIDs on the soil microbiome. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the impact of Ibuprofen, Diclofenac, and their Mixture on the soil microbiomes of three different soil types (Cambic chernozem, Luvisols and Calcaric rendzinas). Changes in the soil microbiome profile were assessed using the phospholipid-derived fatty acid (PLFA) approach, as this method allows for the assessment of quantitative variations in the living soil microorganisms. The results showed that microbiome abundance fluctuates over time in the presence of both individual NSAIDs and mixtures. Cambic chernozem had a higher attenuation efficiency than Luvisols and Calcaric rendzinas. Principal component analysis showed that both fungal and bacterial phyla are affected by NSAIDs. The fungal community was more sensitive to NSAIDs than bacterial phyla in all soil types. Since Diclofenac and Ibuprofen were attenuated entirely at the experiment's end, we concluded that some species could use these NSAIDs as carbon or energy resources. The results of this study provide new insights into the response of the soil microbiome to non-target NSAID exposure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34388,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100833"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666016424002275/pdfft?md5=386014d616729cb933ab67eaf2e95cb5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666016424002275-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs impact the microbial community in three different soil types—a laboratory experiment\",\"authors\":\"Emoke Dalma Kovacs ,&nbsp;Melinda Haydee Kovacs ,&nbsp;Damia Barcelo ,&nbsp;Pereira Paulo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cscee.2024.100833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Commonly used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can enter the soil via several routes. However, there have been relatively few studies on the impact of NSAIDs on the soil microbiome. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the impact of Ibuprofen, Diclofenac, and their Mixture on the soil microbiomes of three different soil types (Cambic chernozem, Luvisols and Calcaric rendzinas). Changes in the soil microbiome profile were assessed using the phospholipid-derived fatty acid (PLFA) approach, as this method allows for the assessment of quantitative variations in the living soil microorganisms. The results showed that microbiome abundance fluctuates over time in the presence of both individual NSAIDs and mixtures. Cambic chernozem had a higher attenuation efficiency than Luvisols and Calcaric rendzinas. Principal component analysis showed that both fungal and bacterial phyla are affected by NSAIDs. The fungal community was more sensitive to NSAIDs than bacterial phyla in all soil types. Since Diclofenac and Ibuprofen were attenuated entirely at the experiment's end, we concluded that some species could use these NSAIDs as carbon or energy resources. The results of this study provide new insights into the response of the soil microbiome to non-target NSAID exposure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100833\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666016424002275/pdfft?md5=386014d616729cb933ab67eaf2e95cb5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666016424002275-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666016424002275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666016424002275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

常用的非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)可通过多种途径进入土壤。然而,有关非甾体抗炎药对土壤微生物组影响的研究相对较少。因此,本研究旨在调查布洛芬、双氯芬酸及其混合物对三种不同土壤类型(寒武纪chernozem、Luvisols和Calcaric rendzinas)的土壤微生物组的影响。使用磷脂衍生脂肪酸(PLFA)方法评估了土壤微生物组的变化,因为这种方法可以评估活的土壤微生物的定量变化。结果表明,在单个非甾体抗炎药和混合物存在的情况下,微生物组的丰度会随着时间的推移而波动。与 Luvisols 和 Calcaric rendzinas 相比,Cambic chernozem 的衰减效率更高。主成分分析表明,真菌和细菌两个门类都受到非甾体抗炎药的影响。在所有土壤类型中,真菌群落比细菌群落对非甾体抗炎药更敏感。由于双氯芬酸和布洛芬在实验结束时完全减弱,我们得出结论,一些物种可能将这些非甾体抗炎药作为碳或能量资源。这项研究的结果为了解土壤微生物组对非目标非甾体抗炎药暴露的反应提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs impact the microbial community in three different soil types—a laboratory experiment

Commonly used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can enter the soil via several routes. However, there have been relatively few studies on the impact of NSAIDs on the soil microbiome. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the impact of Ibuprofen, Diclofenac, and their Mixture on the soil microbiomes of three different soil types (Cambic chernozem, Luvisols and Calcaric rendzinas). Changes in the soil microbiome profile were assessed using the phospholipid-derived fatty acid (PLFA) approach, as this method allows for the assessment of quantitative variations in the living soil microorganisms. The results showed that microbiome abundance fluctuates over time in the presence of both individual NSAIDs and mixtures. Cambic chernozem had a higher attenuation efficiency than Luvisols and Calcaric rendzinas. Principal component analysis showed that both fungal and bacterial phyla are affected by NSAIDs. The fungal community was more sensitive to NSAIDs than bacterial phyla in all soil types. Since Diclofenac and Ibuprofen were attenuated entirely at the experiment's end, we concluded that some species could use these NSAIDs as carbon or energy resources. The results of this study provide new insights into the response of the soil microbiome to non-target NSAID exposure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering
Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
A framework model to prioritize groundwater management actions based on the concept of dominant risk: An application to the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil Determination of the effect of impurity inclusions in the form of oxy-nitride phases in NiAl2O4 ceramics on resistance to high-temperature degradation during hydrogen saturation of near-surface layers Biodiesel production of WCO-neem oil and mixed using pilot plant scale with ultrasound and overhead stirred and characteristic of emissions in fire tube boiler Enhancing domestic wastewater treatment: Integrating vermifiltration and biochar for heavy metal and microplastic reduction and by-product utilization The effect of corrosion inhibitor on X-65 steel weldment in high flow rate conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1