纸张的味道还是屏幕的光泽?学生在纸上和屏幕上阅读时的阅读理解、文本处理和态度

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Education Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105107
Ragnhild Engdal Jensen, Astrid Roe, Marte Blikstad-Balas
{"title":"纸张的味道还是屏幕的光泽?学生在纸上和屏幕上阅读时的阅读理解、文本处理和态度","authors":"Ragnhild Engdal Jensen,&nbsp;Astrid Roe,&nbsp;Marte Blikstad-Balas","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the increasing prevalence of digital devices such as smartphones, tablets and e-readers, more and more reading is happening in digital formats – also in classrooms across the world. The present study focuses on lower secondary school students and their reading comprehension and attitudes toward reading on paper and screens. <em>The study uses an innovative methodological approach were eye-tracking technology is used to observe ten carefully sampled eight grade students with different reading levels.</em> The students read a selection of texts and answered questions from the Norwegian national reading assessment on comparable versions <em>on paper and on screen. By analyzing eye movement data (reading transitions), including more than 25000 fixations, in combination with text reading comprehension outcomes, students' cued retrospective reporting from reading, and interview data we have obtained detailed and comprehensive data on students' reading comprehension, reading behavior, and reading experiences across different media</em>. A key result is that reading on screen leads to more shallow processing and can hinder reading comprehension. Importantly, our results from the students' cued retrospective reporting of their eye tracking, showed that they were unaware of their reading behavior and didn't reflect much on reading in different media. These findings have implications for the increasing shift to digital learning environments in the educational context. It is important to recognize the difference between reading processes, and policymakers and practitioners cannot assume that these processes are the same across individuals and different delivery modes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 105107"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131524001210/pdfft?md5=c9d07fa53ea050445156731b710018aa&pid=1-s2.0-S0360131524001210-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The smell of paper or the shine of a screen? Students’ reading comprehension, text processing, and attitudes when reading on paper and screen\",\"authors\":\"Ragnhild Engdal Jensen,&nbsp;Astrid Roe,&nbsp;Marte Blikstad-Balas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With the increasing prevalence of digital devices such as smartphones, tablets and e-readers, more and more reading is happening in digital formats – also in classrooms across the world. The present study focuses on lower secondary school students and their reading comprehension and attitudes toward reading on paper and screens. <em>The study uses an innovative methodological approach were eye-tracking technology is used to observe ten carefully sampled eight grade students with different reading levels.</em> The students read a selection of texts and answered questions from the Norwegian national reading assessment on comparable versions <em>on paper and on screen. By analyzing eye movement data (reading transitions), including more than 25000 fixations, in combination with text reading comprehension outcomes, students' cued retrospective reporting from reading, and interview data we have obtained detailed and comprehensive data on students' reading comprehension, reading behavior, and reading experiences across different media</em>. A key result is that reading on screen leads to more shallow processing and can hinder reading comprehension. Importantly, our results from the students' cued retrospective reporting of their eye tracking, showed that they were unaware of their reading behavior and didn't reflect much on reading in different media. These findings have implications for the increasing shift to digital learning environments in the educational context. It is important to recognize the difference between reading processes, and policymakers and practitioners cannot assume that these processes are the same across individuals and different delivery modes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Education\",\"volume\":\"219 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131524001210/pdfft?md5=c9d07fa53ea050445156731b710018aa&pid=1-s2.0-S0360131524001210-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131524001210\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131524001210","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着智能手机、平板电脑和电子阅读器等数字设备的日益普及,越来越多的阅读以数字形式进行--在世界各地的教室里也是如此。本研究的重点是初中学生及其阅读理解能力和对纸质阅读和屏幕阅读的态度。研究采用了一种创新的方法,即利用眼动跟踪技术来观察 10 名经过仔细抽样的八年级学生,他们的阅读水平各不相同。这些学生在纸上和屏幕上阅读了精选的文章,并回答了挪威国家阅读评估中的问题。通过分析眼动数据(阅读转换),包括超过 25000 次的定点移动,并结合文本阅读理解结果、学生的阅读提示回溯报告和访谈数据,我们获得了有关学生阅读理解、阅读行为和不同媒体阅读体验的详细而全面的数据。一个重要的结果是,在屏幕上阅读会导致更浅层的处理,并可能妨碍阅读理解。重要的是,我们从学生对眼动追踪的提示性回顾报告中得出的结果显示,他们并没有意识到自己的阅读行为,也没有对不同媒体下的阅读进行过多反思。这些发现对教育领域日益向数字化学习环境转变具有重要意义。重要的是要认识到不同阅读过程之间的差异,决策者和实践者不能假定这些过程在不同个体和不同教学模式之间是相同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The smell of paper or the shine of a screen? Students’ reading comprehension, text processing, and attitudes when reading on paper and screen

With the increasing prevalence of digital devices such as smartphones, tablets and e-readers, more and more reading is happening in digital formats – also in classrooms across the world. The present study focuses on lower secondary school students and their reading comprehension and attitudes toward reading on paper and screens. The study uses an innovative methodological approach were eye-tracking technology is used to observe ten carefully sampled eight grade students with different reading levels. The students read a selection of texts and answered questions from the Norwegian national reading assessment on comparable versions on paper and on screen. By analyzing eye movement data (reading transitions), including more than 25000 fixations, in combination with text reading comprehension outcomes, students' cued retrospective reporting from reading, and interview data we have obtained detailed and comprehensive data on students' reading comprehension, reading behavior, and reading experiences across different media. A key result is that reading on screen leads to more shallow processing and can hinder reading comprehension. Importantly, our results from the students' cued retrospective reporting of their eye tracking, showed that they were unaware of their reading behavior and didn't reflect much on reading in different media. These findings have implications for the increasing shift to digital learning environments in the educational context. It is important to recognize the difference between reading processes, and policymakers and practitioners cannot assume that these processes are the same across individuals and different delivery modes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
期刊最新文献
Personalization in educational gamification: Learners with different trait competitiveness benefit differently from rankings on leaderboards Reducing interpretative ambiguity in an educational environment with ChatGPT Editorial Board “Storytelling and educational robotics: A scoping review (2004–2024)” Advancing a Practical Inquiry Model with multi-perspective role-playing to foster critical thinking behavior in e-book reading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1