了解你的黑客社区检测和调查黑客社区的方法

IF 6.7 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Decision Support Systems Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1016/j.dss.2024.114271
Dalyapraz Manatova , Charles DeVries , Sagar Samtani
{"title":"了解你的黑客社区检测和调查黑客社区的方法","authors":"Dalyapraz Manatova ,&nbsp;Charles DeVries ,&nbsp;Sagar Samtani","doi":"10.1016/j.dss.2024.114271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cyber threat intelligence (CTI) researchers strive to uncover collaborations and emerging techniques within hacker networks. This study proposes an empirical approach to detect communities within hacker forums for CTI purposes. Eighteen algorithms are systematically evaluated, including state-of-the-art and benchmark methods for identifying overlapping and disjoint groups. Using discussions from five prominent English hacker forums, a comparative analysis examines the influence of the algorithms’ theoretical foundations on community detection. Since ground truths are unattainable for such networks, the study utilizes a multi-metric strategy, incorporating modularity, coverage, performance, and a newly introduced quality measure, Triplet Hub Potential, which quantifies the presence of influential hubs. The findings reveal that while modularity optimization algorithms such as Leiden and Louvain deliver consistent results, neighbor-based expanding techniques tend to provide superior performance. In particular, the Expansion algorithm stood out by uncovering granular hierarchical community structures. The ability to investigate these intimacies is helpful for CTI researchers. Ultimately, we suggest an approach to investigate hacker forums using community detection methods and encourage the future development of algorithms tailored to expose nuances within hacker networks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55181,"journal":{"name":"Decision Support Systems","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 114271"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understand your shady neighborhood: An approach for detecting and investigating hacker communities\",\"authors\":\"Dalyapraz Manatova ,&nbsp;Charles DeVries ,&nbsp;Sagar Samtani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dss.2024.114271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cyber threat intelligence (CTI) researchers strive to uncover collaborations and emerging techniques within hacker networks. This study proposes an empirical approach to detect communities within hacker forums for CTI purposes. Eighteen algorithms are systematically evaluated, including state-of-the-art and benchmark methods for identifying overlapping and disjoint groups. Using discussions from five prominent English hacker forums, a comparative analysis examines the influence of the algorithms’ theoretical foundations on community detection. Since ground truths are unattainable for such networks, the study utilizes a multi-metric strategy, incorporating modularity, coverage, performance, and a newly introduced quality measure, Triplet Hub Potential, which quantifies the presence of influential hubs. The findings reveal that while modularity optimization algorithms such as Leiden and Louvain deliver consistent results, neighbor-based expanding techniques tend to provide superior performance. In particular, the Expansion algorithm stood out by uncovering granular hierarchical community structures. The ability to investigate these intimacies is helpful for CTI researchers. Ultimately, we suggest an approach to investigate hacker forums using community detection methods and encourage the future development of algorithms tailored to expose nuances within hacker networks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decision Support Systems\",\"volume\":\"184 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decision Support Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923624001040\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Support Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923624001040","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

网络威胁情报(CTI)研究人员致力于发现黑客网络中的合作关系和新兴技术。本研究提出了一种实证方法,用于检测黑客论坛中的社区,以达到 CTI 的目的。对 18 种算法进行了系统评估,包括用于识别重叠群体和脱节群体的最先进方法和基准方法。通过对五个著名的英语黑客论坛的讨论进行比较分析,研究了算法的理论基础对社区检测的影响。由于此类网络无法获得基本事实,因此研究采用了多指标策略,包括模块化、覆盖率、性能以及新引入的质量指标--三重中心潜能(Triplet Hub Potential),该指标可量化有影响力的中心的存在。研究结果表明,虽然莱顿和卢万等模块化优化算法能提供一致的结果,但基于邻居的扩展技术往往能提供更优越的性能。特别是,扩展算法在发现细粒度分层社区结构方面表现突出。研究这些亲密关系的能力对 CTI 研究人员很有帮助。最终,我们提出了一种使用社区检测方法调查黑客论坛的方法,并鼓励今后开发专门用于揭示黑客网络内部细微差别的算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understand your shady neighborhood: An approach for detecting and investigating hacker communities

Cyber threat intelligence (CTI) researchers strive to uncover collaborations and emerging techniques within hacker networks. This study proposes an empirical approach to detect communities within hacker forums for CTI purposes. Eighteen algorithms are systematically evaluated, including state-of-the-art and benchmark methods for identifying overlapping and disjoint groups. Using discussions from five prominent English hacker forums, a comparative analysis examines the influence of the algorithms’ theoretical foundations on community detection. Since ground truths are unattainable for such networks, the study utilizes a multi-metric strategy, incorporating modularity, coverage, performance, and a newly introduced quality measure, Triplet Hub Potential, which quantifies the presence of influential hubs. The findings reveal that while modularity optimization algorithms such as Leiden and Louvain deliver consistent results, neighbor-based expanding techniques tend to provide superior performance. In particular, the Expansion algorithm stood out by uncovering granular hierarchical community structures. The ability to investigate these intimacies is helpful for CTI researchers. Ultimately, we suggest an approach to investigate hacker forums using community detection methods and encourage the future development of algorithms tailored to expose nuances within hacker networks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Decision Support Systems
Decision Support Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
13 months
期刊介绍: The common thread of articles published in Decision Support Systems is their relevance to theoretical and technical issues in the support of enhanced decision making. The areas addressed may include foundations, functionality, interfaces, implementation, impacts, and evaluation of decision support systems (DSSs).
期刊最新文献
A comparative analysis of the effect of initiative risk statement versus passive risk disclosure on the financing performance of Kickstarter campaigns DeepSecure: A computational design science approach for interpretable threat hunting in cybersecurity decision making Editorial Board Effects of visual-preview and information-sidedness features on website persuasiveness The evolution of organizations and stakeholders for metaverse ecosystems: Editorial for the special issue on metaverse part 1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1