在多床位病房现场隔离疑似 COVID-19 患者后的二次发病率。

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1186/s13756-024-01430-4
Silvio Ragozzino, Richard Kuehl, Karoline Leuzinger, Pascal Schläpfer, Pascal Urwyler, Ana Durovic, Sandra Zingg, Matthias von Rotz, Manuel Battegay, Andreas F Widmer, Hans H Hirsch, Stefano Bassetti, Sarah Tschudin-Sutter
{"title":"在多床位病房现场隔离疑似 COVID-19 患者后的二次发病率。","authors":"Silvio Ragozzino, Richard Kuehl, Karoline Leuzinger, Pascal Schläpfer, Pascal Urwyler, Ana Durovic, Sandra Zingg, Matthias von Rotz, Manuel Battegay, Andreas F Widmer, Hans H Hirsch, Stefano Bassetti, Sarah Tschudin-Sutter","doi":"10.1186/s13756-024-01430-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The implementation of isolation precautions for patients with suspected Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pending test results is resource intensive. Due to the limited availability of single-bed rooms at our institution, we isolated patients with suspected COVID-19 together with patients without suspected COVID-19 on-site in multiple-bed rooms until SARS-CoV-2-test results were available. We evaluated the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to individuals sharing the room with patients isolated on-site. This observational study was performed at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, from 03/20 - 11/20. Secondary attack rates were compared between patients hospitalized in multiple-bed rooms and exposed to individuals subjected to on-site isolation precautions (on-site isolation group), and patients exposed to individuals initially not identified as having COVID-19, and not placed under isolation precautions until the diagnosis was suspected (control group). Transmission events were confirmed by whole-genome sequencing. Among 1,218 patients with suspected COVID-19, 67 (5.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 21 were isolated on-site potentially exposing 27 patients sharing the same room. Median contact time was 12 h (interquartile range 7-18 h). SARS-CoV-2 transmission was identified in none of the patients in the on-site isolation group vs. 10/63 (15.9%) in the control group (p = 0.03). Isolation on-site of suspected COVID-19-patients in multiple-bed rooms avoided single-room occupancy and subsequent in-hospital relocation for many patients without confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infection. The absence of secondary transmission among the exposed patients in the on-site isolation group allows for assessment of the risk/benefit ratio of this strategy given the limitation of a small sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":"13 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11227710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secondary attack rate following on-site isolation of patients with suspected COVID-19 in multiple-bed rooms.\",\"authors\":\"Silvio Ragozzino, Richard Kuehl, Karoline Leuzinger, Pascal Schläpfer, Pascal Urwyler, Ana Durovic, Sandra Zingg, Matthias von Rotz, Manuel Battegay, Andreas F Widmer, Hans H Hirsch, Stefano Bassetti, Sarah Tschudin-Sutter\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13756-024-01430-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The implementation of isolation precautions for patients with suspected Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pending test results is resource intensive. Due to the limited availability of single-bed rooms at our institution, we isolated patients with suspected COVID-19 together with patients without suspected COVID-19 on-site in multiple-bed rooms until SARS-CoV-2-test results were available. We evaluated the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to individuals sharing the room with patients isolated on-site. This observational study was performed at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, from 03/20 - 11/20. Secondary attack rates were compared between patients hospitalized in multiple-bed rooms and exposed to individuals subjected to on-site isolation precautions (on-site isolation group), and patients exposed to individuals initially not identified as having COVID-19, and not placed under isolation precautions until the diagnosis was suspected (control group). Transmission events were confirmed by whole-genome sequencing. Among 1,218 patients with suspected COVID-19, 67 (5.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 21 were isolated on-site potentially exposing 27 patients sharing the same room. Median contact time was 12 h (interquartile range 7-18 h). SARS-CoV-2 transmission was identified in none of the patients in the on-site isolation group vs. 10/63 (15.9%) in the control group (p = 0.03). Isolation on-site of suspected COVID-19-patients in multiple-bed rooms avoided single-room occupancy and subsequent in-hospital relocation for many patients without confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infection. The absence of secondary transmission among the exposed patients in the on-site isolation group allows for assessment of the risk/benefit ratio of this strategy given the limitation of a small sample size.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11227710/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-024-01430-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-024-01430-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对疑似感染 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)并等待检测结果的患者实施隔离预防措施需要大量资源。由于我院单人病房有限,我们将疑似感染 COVID-19 的患者与未感染 COVID-19 的患者一起隔离在多人间,直到 SARS-CoV-2 检测结果出来。我们评估了 SARS-CoV-2 向与现场隔离患者同住一室的人传播的可能性。这项观察性研究于 20 年 3 月至 20 年 11 月在瑞士巴塞尔大学医院进行。比较了在多床位病房住院并接触到接受现场隔离预防措施的患者(现场隔离组)和接触到最初未被发现感染 COVID-19、在疑似诊断前未采取隔离预防措施的患者(对照组)的二次发病率。传播事件通过全基因组测序得到确认。在 1218 名疑似 COVID-19 患者中,有 67 人(5.5%)的 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性。其中,21 人是在现场被分离出来的,有 27 名共用一个房间的患者可能因此受到感染。接触时间中位数为 12 小时(四分位数间距为 7-18 小时)。现场隔离组没有发现 SARS-CoV-2 传播,而对照组有 10/63 例(15.9%)(P = 0.03)。在多床位病房对疑似 COVID-19 患者进行现场隔离,避免了许多未确诊感染 SARS-CoV-2 的患者住进单人病房,也避免了随后的院内转移。由于样本量较小,现场隔离组中暴露的病人之间没有二次传播,因此可以对这一策略的风险/效益比进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Secondary attack rate following on-site isolation of patients with suspected COVID-19 in multiple-bed rooms.

The implementation of isolation precautions for patients with suspected Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pending test results is resource intensive. Due to the limited availability of single-bed rooms at our institution, we isolated patients with suspected COVID-19 together with patients without suspected COVID-19 on-site in multiple-bed rooms until SARS-CoV-2-test results were available. We evaluated the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to individuals sharing the room with patients isolated on-site. This observational study was performed at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, from 03/20 - 11/20. Secondary attack rates were compared between patients hospitalized in multiple-bed rooms and exposed to individuals subjected to on-site isolation precautions (on-site isolation group), and patients exposed to individuals initially not identified as having COVID-19, and not placed under isolation precautions until the diagnosis was suspected (control group). Transmission events were confirmed by whole-genome sequencing. Among 1,218 patients with suspected COVID-19, 67 (5.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 21 were isolated on-site potentially exposing 27 patients sharing the same room. Median contact time was 12 h (interquartile range 7-18 h). SARS-CoV-2 transmission was identified in none of the patients in the on-site isolation group vs. 10/63 (15.9%) in the control group (p = 0.03). Isolation on-site of suspected COVID-19-patients in multiple-bed rooms avoided single-room occupancy and subsequent in-hospital relocation for many patients without confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infection. The absence of secondary transmission among the exposed patients in the on-site isolation group allows for assessment of the risk/benefit ratio of this strategy given the limitation of a small sample size.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
140
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control is a global forum for all those working on the prevention, diagnostic and treatment of health-care associated infections and antimicrobial resistance development in all health-care settings. The journal covers a broad spectrum of preeminent practices and best available data to the top interventional and translational research, and innovative developments in the field of infection control.
期刊最新文献
Antimicrobial stewardship in practice: determinants of prescription behaviour and developing interventions to improve surgical prophylaxis in a Rwandan tertiary hospital-a mixed methods study using the behaviour change wheel. Effect of national antimicrobial resistance policies on antibiotic prescribing rates in South Korea: an interrupted time series analysis. Multidimensional assessment of hand hygiene compliance and its association with healthcare-associated infection incidence in intensive care units. Hand hygiene knowledge, glove use misconceptions, and determinants among healthcare workers in Addis Ababa hospitals: a mixed-method cross-sectional study. Optimizing antibiotic use for cesarean section in anticipation of the diagnosis-related groups payment system: a retrospective cohort study on the impact of clinical pharmacist intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1