Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) defines rational use of drug as a state in which medications are received by patients appropriately according to their clinical needs and individual requirement, for adequate period and at the right cost. More than 50% of all medicines are prescribed, dispensed, or sold inappropriately worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the prescribing patterns in Adigrat general hospital, Tigrai, Ethiopia.
Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was done to evaluate prescription patterns. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select 600 prescriptions and the prescriptions were reviewed using WHO/International Network of Rational Use of Drugs prescribing indicators. Data was collected from prescriptions dispensed from 01 March 2023 to 30 March 2024 at outpatient pharmacy of Adigrat general hospital. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 21 and a p-value < 0.05 was declared statistically significant.
Results: A total of 1088 medicines were prescribed in 600 prescription encounters, giving an average number of 1.8 (± 0.83) medicines per encounter. The percentage of medicines prescribed by generic name was 91.5% while 98.7% of the medicines were prescribed from essential medicine list (EML). Besides, the percentages of encounters containing at least one antibiotic and one injection were 44.5% and 7.2%, respectively. A total of 340 antibiotics were prescribed in 267 encounters. Penicillins (34.4%), macrolides (23.8%) and fluoroquinolones (17.1%) were the most prevalent antibiotics classes. The "Access" and "Watch" groups covered 54.4% and 45.6% of the total antibiotics prescribed, respectively. Being under 18 years old [Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 9.830, CI: 4.062-23.786], being prescribed with three medicines (AOR: 3.247, CI: 1.571-6.708) and certain diagnosis like diseases of the respiratory system (AOR: 3.750, CI: 2.136-6.584) were significantly associated with antibiotic prescribing.
Conclusion: This study showed deviations of prescribing patterns from WHO standards. The percentage of prescriptions with antibiotic was far from WHO optimal value. The use of antibiotics from "Access" group was below WHO standard. The percentage of medicines prescribed by generic name and the percentage of encounters with injection also deviated from WHO standard. Antibiotics prescribing showed significantly association with age, number of medicines and certain diseases.
{"title":"WHO/INRUD prescribing indicators with a focus on antibiotics utilization patterns at outpatient department of Adigrat general hospital, Tigrai, Ethiopia: a retrospective cross-sectional study.","authors":"Gebretekle Gebremichael Hailesilase, Brhane Gebrehiwot Welegebrial, Mezgebe Gidey Weres, Senait Abera Gebrewahd","doi":"10.1186/s13756-024-01490-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13756-024-01490-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Health Organization (WHO) defines rational use of drug as a state in which medications are received by patients appropriately according to their clinical needs and individual requirement, for adequate period and at the right cost. More than 50% of all medicines are prescribed, dispensed, or sold inappropriately worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the prescribing patterns in Adigrat general hospital, Tigrai, Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study was done to evaluate prescription patterns. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select 600 prescriptions and the prescriptions were reviewed using WHO/International Network of Rational Use of Drugs prescribing indicators. Data was collected from prescriptions dispensed from 01 March 2023 to 30 March 2024 at outpatient pharmacy of Adigrat general hospital. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 21 and a p-value < 0.05 was declared statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1088 medicines were prescribed in 600 prescription encounters, giving an average number of 1.8 (± 0.83) medicines per encounter. The percentage of medicines prescribed by generic name was 91.5% while 98.7% of the medicines were prescribed from essential medicine list (EML). Besides, the percentages of encounters containing at least one antibiotic and one injection were 44.5% and 7.2%, respectively. A total of 340 antibiotics were prescribed in 267 encounters. Penicillins (34.4%), macrolides (23.8%) and fluoroquinolones (17.1%) were the most prevalent antibiotics classes. The \"Access\" and \"Watch\" groups covered 54.4% and 45.6% of the total antibiotics prescribed, respectively. Being under 18 years old [Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 9.830, CI: 4.062-23.786], being prescribed with three medicines (AOR: 3.247, CI: 1.571-6.708) and certain diagnosis like diseases of the respiratory system (AOR: 3.750, CI: 2.136-6.584) were significantly associated with antibiotic prescribing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed deviations of prescribing patterns from WHO standards. The percentage of prescriptions with antibiotic was far from WHO optimal value. The use of antibiotics from \"Access\" group was below WHO standard. The percentage of medicines prescribed by generic name and the percentage of encounters with injection also deviated from WHO standard. Antibiotics prescribing showed significantly association with age, number of medicines and certain diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539567/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142590108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-03DOI: 10.1186/s13756-024-01484-4
Valeria Fabre, Clara Secaira, Carolyn Herzig, Elizabeth Bancroft, Maria Paula Bernachea, Lucy Anchiraico Galarza, Bowen Aquiles, Ana Belén Arauz, Maria Del Carmen Bangher, Marisa Liliana Bernan, Sol Burokas, Alfredo Canton, Iris L Cazali, Angel Colque, Marisabel Comas, Rosa Verónica Contreras, Wanda Cornistein, Maria Gabriela Cordoba, Silvia Mabel Correa, Gustavo Costilla Campero, Marta Isabel Chamorro Ayala, Nuria Chavez, Gabriela De Ascencao, Carlos Cruz García, Clara Esquivel, Cecilia Ezcurra, Leonardo Fabbro, Leandro Falleroni, Johana Fernandez, Sandra Ferrari, Veronica Freire, Maria Isabel Garzón, José Anel Gonzales, Lucrecia Guaymas, Fausto Guerrero-Toapanta, Diego Laplume, Sandra Lambert, César Guillermo Lemir, Paola Romina Lazarte, Itzel L Lopez, Herberth Maldonado, Guadalupe Martínez, Diego M Maurizi, Florencia Mesplet, Cristina Moreno Izquierdo, Gabriela Luciana Moya, Mariela Nájera, Yanina Nuccetelli, Argelis Olmedo, Belén Palacio, Florencia Pellice, Carla Lorena Raffo, Carolina Ramos, Fanny Reino, Viviana Rodriguez, Federico Romero, Juan José Romero, Graciela Sadino, Nancy Sandoval, Mariana Suarez, Maria Victoria Suayter, Maria Alejandra Ureña, Marisol Valle, Ligia Vence Reyes, Silvia Vera Amate Perez, Hugo Videla, Silvina Villamandos, Olmedo Villarreal, Maria Alejandra Viteri, Eduardo Warley, Rodolfo E Quiros
Background: Infection prevention and control (IPC) programs are essential to prevent and control the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms in healthcare facilities (HCFs). The current implementation of these programs in Latin America remains largely unknown.
Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of IPC program implementation in HCFs from Guatemala, Panama, Ecuador, and Argentina, March-July 2022. We used the World Health Organization (WHO) IPC Assessment Framework (IPCAF) survey, a previously validated structured questionnaire with an associated scoring system that evaluates the eight core components of IPC (IPC program; IPC guidelines; IPC education and training; healthcare-associated infection [HAI] surveillance; multimodal strategies; monitoring and audit of IPC practices and feedback; workload, staffing, and bed occupancy; and the built environment and materials and equipment for IPC). Each section generates a score 0-100. According to the final score, the HCF IPC program implementation is categorized into four levels: inadequate (0-200), basic (201-400), intermediate (401-600), or advanced (601-800). Additionally, we conducted semi-structured interviews among IPC personnel and microbiologists using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model to evaluate barriers and facilitators for IPC program implementation. We performed directed content analysis of interview transcripts to identify themes that focused on barriers and facilitators of IPC program implementation which are summarized descriptively.
Results: Thirty-seven HCFs (15 for-profit and 22 non-profit) completed the IPCAF survey. The overall median score was 614 (IQR 569, 693) which corresponded to an "advanced" level of IPC implementation (32% [7/22] non-profit vs. 93% [14/15] for-profit HCFs in this category). The lowest scores were in workload, staffing and bed occupancy followed by IPC training and multimodal strategies. Forty individuals from 16 HCFs were interviewed. They perceived inadequate staffing and technical resources, limited leadership support, and cultural determinants as major barriers to effective IPC guideline implementation, while external accreditation and technical support from public health authorities were perceived as facilitators.
Conclusions: Efforts to strengthen IPC activities in Latin American HCFs should focus on improving support from hospital leadership and public health authorities to ensure better resource allocation, promoting safety culture, and improving training in quality improvement.
{"title":"Contextual barriers to infection prevention and control program implementation in hospitals in Latin America: a mixed methods evaluation.","authors":"Valeria Fabre, Clara Secaira, Carolyn Herzig, Elizabeth Bancroft, Maria Paula Bernachea, Lucy Anchiraico Galarza, Bowen Aquiles, Ana Belén Arauz, Maria Del Carmen Bangher, Marisa Liliana Bernan, Sol Burokas, Alfredo Canton, Iris L Cazali, Angel Colque, Marisabel Comas, Rosa Verónica Contreras, Wanda Cornistein, Maria Gabriela Cordoba, Silvia Mabel Correa, Gustavo Costilla Campero, Marta Isabel Chamorro Ayala, Nuria Chavez, Gabriela De Ascencao, Carlos Cruz García, Clara Esquivel, Cecilia Ezcurra, Leonardo Fabbro, Leandro Falleroni, Johana Fernandez, Sandra Ferrari, Veronica Freire, Maria Isabel Garzón, José Anel Gonzales, Lucrecia Guaymas, Fausto Guerrero-Toapanta, Diego Laplume, Sandra Lambert, César Guillermo Lemir, Paola Romina Lazarte, Itzel L Lopez, Herberth Maldonado, Guadalupe Martínez, Diego M Maurizi, Florencia Mesplet, Cristina Moreno Izquierdo, Gabriela Luciana Moya, Mariela Nájera, Yanina Nuccetelli, Argelis Olmedo, Belén Palacio, Florencia Pellice, Carla Lorena Raffo, Carolina Ramos, Fanny Reino, Viviana Rodriguez, Federico Romero, Juan José Romero, Graciela Sadino, Nancy Sandoval, Mariana Suarez, Maria Victoria Suayter, Maria Alejandra Ureña, Marisol Valle, Ligia Vence Reyes, Silvia Vera Amate Perez, Hugo Videla, Silvina Villamandos, Olmedo Villarreal, Maria Alejandra Viteri, Eduardo Warley, Rodolfo E Quiros","doi":"10.1186/s13756-024-01484-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13756-024-01484-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infection prevention and control (IPC) programs are essential to prevent and control the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms in healthcare facilities (HCFs). The current implementation of these programs in Latin America remains largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of IPC program implementation in HCFs from Guatemala, Panama, Ecuador, and Argentina, March-July 2022. We used the World Health Organization (WHO) IPC Assessment Framework (IPCAF) survey, a previously validated structured questionnaire with an associated scoring system that evaluates the eight core components of IPC (IPC program; IPC guidelines; IPC education and training; healthcare-associated infection [HAI] surveillance; multimodal strategies; monitoring and audit of IPC practices and feedback; workload, staffing, and bed occupancy; and the built environment and materials and equipment for IPC). Each section generates a score 0-100. According to the final score, the HCF IPC program implementation is categorized into four levels: inadequate (0-200), basic (201-400), intermediate (401-600), or advanced (601-800). Additionally, we conducted semi-structured interviews among IPC personnel and microbiologists using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model to evaluate barriers and facilitators for IPC program implementation. We performed directed content analysis of interview transcripts to identify themes that focused on barriers and facilitators of IPC program implementation which are summarized descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven HCFs (15 for-profit and 22 non-profit) completed the IPCAF survey. The overall median score was 614 (IQR 569, 693) which corresponded to an \"advanced\" level of IPC implementation (32% [7/22] non-profit vs. 93% [14/15] for-profit HCFs in this category). The lowest scores were in workload, staffing and bed occupancy followed by IPC training and multimodal strategies. Forty individuals from 16 HCFs were interviewed. They perceived inadequate staffing and technical resources, limited leadership support, and cultural determinants as major barriers to effective IPC guideline implementation, while external accreditation and technical support from public health authorities were perceived as facilitators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts to strengthen IPC activities in Latin American HCFs should focus on improving support from hospital leadership and public health authorities to ensure better resource allocation, promoting safety culture, and improving training in quality improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533356/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142567888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-29DOI: 10.1186/s13756-024-01483-5
Amos Tumizani Kachipedzu, David King Kulapani, Samuel James Meja, Janelisa Musaya
Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are one of the most common healthcare-associated infections and preventable complication of surgical procedure; continue to threaten public health with significant effects on the patients and health care human and financial resources. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the incidence of SSIs, risk factors and common microorganisms associated with SSI and assess the practice of antimicrobial use in women following Caesarean Section (CS) at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH).
Methods: This was a hospital-based quantitative prospective study design involving pregnant women who underwent a CS between February, 2023 and July, 2023 at QECH with 30 day-follow-ups. Wound specimens (wound swabs) were collected from all infected CS wounds and processed at QECH main laboratory, and susceptibility testing was conducted using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method with results reported only as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant and the collected data was analyzed using Stata.
Results: The overall cumulative incidence of SSI recorded at QECH during the study period was 9.61% (20 cases out of 208). Of these, 19 (95%) of them reported superficial SSI following CS. The mean age was 26.1 years with a standard deviation of 6.2. All pregnant women who underwent for CS received antibiotic prophylaxis. This study revealed that 138 (66.35%) patients received both preoperative antibiotics (ceftriaxone) and post-CS antibiotics without knowing the specific bacterial organism isolated. This study revealed that ruptured membrane had twice the incidence of SSIs compared to intact membrane (χ2 = 2.0922), though not statistically significant. The majority of patients with SSIs (n = 12, 60%) were readmitted and 5 (25%) out of 20 with SSIs had antimicrobial resistance following susceptibility testing. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism (3, 60%) and other bacterial isolates included were Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter baumanni.
Conclusion: The incidence of SSIs and inappropriate antimicrobial use following CS remains a challenge at QECH. Therefore, due to increased number of SSIs following CS with relative emergence of AMR ensure intensive infection prevention and control practices, establishing AMS program and routine surveillance of SSIs at QECH.
{"title":"Surgical site infection and antimicrobial use following caesarean section at QECH in Blantyre, Malawi: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Amos Tumizani Kachipedzu, David King Kulapani, Samuel James Meja, Janelisa Musaya","doi":"10.1186/s13756-024-01483-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13756-024-01483-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infections (SSIs) are one of the most common healthcare-associated infections and preventable complication of surgical procedure; continue to threaten public health with significant effects on the patients and health care human and financial resources. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the incidence of SSIs, risk factors and common microorganisms associated with SSI and assess the practice of antimicrobial use in women following Caesarean Section (CS) at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a hospital-based quantitative prospective study design involving pregnant women who underwent a CS between February, 2023 and July, 2023 at QECH with 30 day-follow-ups. Wound specimens (wound swabs) were collected from all infected CS wounds and processed at QECH main laboratory, and susceptibility testing was conducted using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method with results reported only as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant and the collected data was analyzed using Stata.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall cumulative incidence of SSI recorded at QECH during the study period was 9.61% (20 cases out of 208). Of these, 19 (95%) of them reported superficial SSI following CS. The mean age was 26.1 years with a standard deviation of 6.2. All pregnant women who underwent for CS received antibiotic prophylaxis. This study revealed that 138 (66.35%) patients received both preoperative antibiotics (ceftriaxone) and post-CS antibiotics without knowing the specific bacterial organism isolated. This study revealed that ruptured membrane had twice the incidence of SSIs compared to intact membrane (χ<sup>2</sup> = 2.0922), though not statistically significant. The majority of patients with SSIs (n = 12, 60%) were readmitted and 5 (25%) out of 20 with SSIs had antimicrobial resistance following susceptibility testing. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism (3, 60%) and other bacterial isolates included were Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter baumanni.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of SSIs and inappropriate antimicrobial use following CS remains a challenge at QECH. Therefore, due to increased number of SSIs following CS with relative emergence of AMR ensure intensive infection prevention and control practices, establishing AMS program and routine surveillance of SSIs at QECH.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520451/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142543228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-29DOI: 10.1186/s13756-024-01481-7
Lenard Cheng, Shun Yee Low, Yuru Boon, Carmen Goh, Abigail Ng, Alexander Jet Yue Ng, Joshua Teo, Nur Humaira Johari, Yong Hao Pua, Mui Teng Chua, Win Sen Kuan
Study objective: We examined the effectiveness of an antimicrobial surface coating for continual disinfection of high touch-frequency surfaces in the emergency department (ED).
Methods: Following a preliminary observation identifying stretcher rails as the surface with highest touch-frequency in the ED, we conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial involving 96 stretcher rails. The stretchers were randomized to receive an antimicrobial surface coating or placebo coating. Routine cleaning of stretchers subsequently continued as per hospital protocol in both arms. Sampling for total aerobic, gram-positive halophilic, gram-negative and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteria was performed pre- and post-treatment at 24 h, 7 days and 180 days. Individuals who applied the coating and outcome assessors were blinded to the allocated arms. The primary outcome is contamination of antimicrobial versus placebo rails measured as colony forming units per cm2(CFU/cm2).
Results: Baseline total aerobic bacteria was comparable between placebo and intervention arms (0.84 versus 1.32 CFU/cm2, P = 0.235). Total aerobic bacteria contamination was significantly lower on antimicrobial versus placebo rails at 24 h (0.61 versus 1.01 CFU/cm2, median difference 0.40 CFU/cm2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01 to 1.01 CFU/cm2). There was a non-statistically significant tendency for contamination to be lower on antimicrobial versus placebo rails at 7 days (1.15 versus 1.50 CFU/cm2, median difference 0.35 CFU/cm2, 95% CI -0.64 to 1.28 CFU/cm2), but higher at 180 days (2.06 versus 1.84 CFU/cm2, median difference - 0.22 CFU/cm2, 95% CI -1.19 to 0.78 CFU/cm2).
Conclusion: This is the first double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to evaluate an antimicrobial surface coating on high touch-frequency surfaces in the emergency department. Total aerobic bacteria found on antimicrobial-coated patient transport stretcher rails was significantly lower than placebo rails at 24 h.
{"title":"Antimicrobial surface coating in the emergency department as protective technology for infection control (ASEPTIC): a pilot randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Lenard Cheng, Shun Yee Low, Yuru Boon, Carmen Goh, Abigail Ng, Alexander Jet Yue Ng, Joshua Teo, Nur Humaira Johari, Yong Hao Pua, Mui Teng Chua, Win Sen Kuan","doi":"10.1186/s13756-024-01481-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13756-024-01481-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>We examined the effectiveness of an antimicrobial surface coating for continual disinfection of high touch-frequency surfaces in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following a preliminary observation identifying stretcher rails as the surface with highest touch-frequency in the ED, we conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial involving 96 stretcher rails. The stretchers were randomized to receive an antimicrobial surface coating or placebo coating. Routine cleaning of stretchers subsequently continued as per hospital protocol in both arms. Sampling for total aerobic, gram-positive halophilic, gram-negative and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteria was performed pre- and post-treatment at 24 h, 7 days and 180 days. Individuals who applied the coating and outcome assessors were blinded to the allocated arms. The primary outcome is contamination of antimicrobial versus placebo rails measured as colony forming units per cm<sup>2</sup>(CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline total aerobic bacteria was comparable between placebo and intervention arms (0.84 versus 1.32 CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>, P = 0.235). Total aerobic bacteria contamination was significantly lower on antimicrobial versus placebo rails at 24 h (0.61 versus 1.01 CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>, median difference 0.40 CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01 to 1.01 CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>). There was a non-statistically significant tendency for contamination to be lower on antimicrobial versus placebo rails at 7 days (1.15 versus 1.50 CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>, median difference 0.35 CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI -0.64 to 1.28 CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>), but higher at 180 days (2.06 versus 1.84 CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>, median difference - 0.22 CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI -1.19 to 0.78 CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to evaluate an antimicrobial surface coating on high touch-frequency surfaces in the emergency department. Total aerobic bacteria found on antimicrobial-coated patient transport stretcher rails was significantly lower than placebo rails at 24 h.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520898/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142520775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-29DOI: 10.1186/s13756-024-01488-0
Estelle Moulin, Paraskevas Filippidis, Corinne Aymon Paire-Ficout, Dominique S Blanc, Bruno Grandbastien, Laurence Senn
Background: The hospital wastewater system has been reported as a source of nosocomial acquisition of carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in various settings. Cleaning and disinfection protocols or replacement of contaminated equipment often fail to eradicate these environmental reservoirs, which can lead to long-term transmission of CPE. We report a successful multimodal approach to control a New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase positive Klebsiella pneumoniae (NDM-KP) nosocomial outbreak implicating contamination of sink traps in a low-incidence setting.
Methods: Following the incidental identification of NDM-KP in a urine culture of an inpatient, we performed an epidemiological investigation, including patient and environmental CPE screening, and whole genome sequencing (WGS) of strains. We also implemented multimodal infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, namely the isolation of cases, waterless patient care, replacement of contaminated P-traps and connecting pieces, and bleach and steam disinfection of sinks for 6 months, followed by patient and environmental screenings for eradication.
Results: Between February and May 2022, five NDM-KP cases were identified in an eight-bed neurosurgical intermediate care unit. Among the eight sink traps of the unit, three were positive for NDM-KP. Patient and environmental isolates belonged to multilocus sequence typing ST-268. All isolate genomes were genetically very similar suggesting cross-transmission and a potential role of the environment as the source of transmissions. Following the introduction of combined IPC measures, no new case was subsequently detected and sink traps remained negative for NDM-KP within 6 months after the intervention.
Conclusion: The implementation of multimodal IPC measures, including waterless patient care combined with the replacement and disinfection of P-traps and connecting pieces, was successful in the control of NDM-KP after eight months. In a low-incidence setting, this approach has made it possible to pursue the objective of zero transmission of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE).
{"title":"Successful control of an environmental reservoir of NDM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae associated with nosocomial transmissions in a low-incidence setting.","authors":"Estelle Moulin, Paraskevas Filippidis, Corinne Aymon Paire-Ficout, Dominique S Blanc, Bruno Grandbastien, Laurence Senn","doi":"10.1186/s13756-024-01488-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13756-024-01488-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The hospital wastewater system has been reported as a source of nosocomial acquisition of carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in various settings. Cleaning and disinfection protocols or replacement of contaminated equipment often fail to eradicate these environmental reservoirs, which can lead to long-term transmission of CPE. We report a successful multimodal approach to control a New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase positive Klebsiella pneumoniae (NDM-KP) nosocomial outbreak implicating contamination of sink traps in a low-incidence setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the incidental identification of NDM-KP in a urine culture of an inpatient, we performed an epidemiological investigation, including patient and environmental CPE screening, and whole genome sequencing (WGS) of strains. We also implemented multimodal infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, namely the isolation of cases, waterless patient care, replacement of contaminated P-traps and connecting pieces, and bleach and steam disinfection of sinks for 6 months, followed by patient and environmental screenings for eradication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between February and May 2022, five NDM-KP cases were identified in an eight-bed neurosurgical intermediate care unit. Among the eight sink traps of the unit, three were positive for NDM-KP. Patient and environmental isolates belonged to multilocus sequence typing ST-268. All isolate genomes were genetically very similar suggesting cross-transmission and a potential role of the environment as the source of transmissions. Following the introduction of combined IPC measures, no new case was subsequently detected and sink traps remained negative for NDM-KP within 6 months after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of multimodal IPC measures, including waterless patient care combined with the replacement and disinfection of P-traps and connecting pieces, was successful in the control of NDM-KP after eight months. In a low-incidence setting, this approach has made it possible to pursue the objective of zero transmission of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE).</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520856/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142520776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-26DOI: 10.1186/s13756-024-01486-2
Yana Halmans, D J Wellenstein, M Romijn, A J M van Bemmel, H van den Berge, R A Scheeren, J S Kalpoe, R Klont, J H van Zeijl, H Sikkema, S M Euser, J Hopman, R P Takes, G B van den Broek
Background: To prevent cross-contamination between patients, adequate reprocessing is necessary when using flexible endoscopes (FEs) without a working channel. The current reprocessing process using an Endoscope Washer Disinfector (EWD) is time-consuming. Ultraviolet light group C (UV-C) exposition is an alternative and fast disinfection method and has previously been shown to adequately reduce Colony Forming Units (CFUs) on FEs without a working channel. The objective of this study was to examine whether UV-C light is as effective in reducing CFUs on contaminated FEs without a working channel compared to the EWD.
Methods: FEs without a working channel were collected in three different Otorhinolaryngology Departments in the Netherlands. After pharyngolaryngoscopy, a manual pre-cleaning with tap water was performed and a culture was collected by rolling the distal 8-10 cm of the FE over an agar plate. Next, the FE was randomly assigned to be disinfected with UV-C light (D60) or the EWD (gold standard). After disinfection, another culture was taken. The primary outcome was microbiological contamination, defined by Colony Forming Units (CFU).
Results: 600 FEs without a working channel were randomized. After clinical use and manual pre-cleaning, 239/300 (79.7%) FEs in the UV-C group and 262/300 (87.3%) FEs in the EWD group were contaminated (i.e., > 0 CFU). FEs without culture confirmed contamination were excluded from further analysis. After UV-C light disinfection, 195/239 (81.6%) FEs showed 0 CFUs, compared to 187/262 (71.4%) FEs disinfected with the EWD (p < 0.01). A multivariate logistics regression analysis showed an increased odds of 0 CFUs when using UV-C light (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.19-2.79; p < 0.01), conditional on participating hospitals and types of FE.
Conclusions: UV-C light disinfection of FEs without a working channel appears more effective in reducing CFUs compared to the EWD and might be a good alternative disinfection method.
Trial registration: Not applicable.
背景:为了防止病人之间的交叉感染,在使用没有工作通道的柔性内窥镜(FE)时,必须进行充分的再处理。目前使用内窥镜清洗消毒器(EWD)进行的再处理过程非常耗时。C 组紫外线(UV-C)照射是一种替代性的快速消毒方法,以前的研究表明它能充分减少无工作通道 FE 上的菌落形成单位(CFU)。本研究的目的是检验与 EWD 相比,紫外线-C 是否能有效减少无工作通道的受污染纤维素上的菌落形成单位:方法: 在荷兰三个不同的耳鼻喉科收集无工作通道的 FE。咽喉内窥镜检查后,用自来水进行人工预清洁,并在琼脂平板上滚动 FE 的远端 8-10 厘米收集培养物。然后,随机分配 FE 用紫外线-C 光(D60)或 EWD(金标准)消毒。消毒后,再进行一次培养。主要结果是微生物污染,以菌落形成单位(CFU)定义:随机抽取了 600 台无工作通道的 FE。经过临床使用和人工预清洁后,紫外线-C 组和 EWD 组分别有 239/300 台(79.7%)和 262/300 台(87.3%)FE 受污染(即 > 0 CFU)。没有经过培养确认污染的 FEs 被排除在进一步分析之外。紫外线-C 光消毒后,195/239(81.6%)个 FE 显示为 0 CFU,而使用 EWD 消毒的 187/262(71.4%)个 FE 显示为 0 CFU(p 结论:紫外线-C 光消毒后,FE 的 CFU 为 0,而使用 EWD 消毒的 187/262(71.4%)个 FE 显示为 0:紫外线-C 光消毒无工作通道的 FE 比 EWD 更能有效减少 CFU,可能是一种很好的替代消毒方法:试验注册:不适用。
{"title":"A multicenter study comparing the bacterial reduction on flexible endoscopes without a working channel between UV-C light disinfection versus standard endoscope Washer Disinfection: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yana Halmans, D J Wellenstein, M Romijn, A J M van Bemmel, H van den Berge, R A Scheeren, J S Kalpoe, R Klont, J H van Zeijl, H Sikkema, S M Euser, J Hopman, R P Takes, G B van den Broek","doi":"10.1186/s13756-024-01486-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13756-024-01486-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To prevent cross-contamination between patients, adequate reprocessing is necessary when using flexible endoscopes (FEs) without a working channel. The current reprocessing process using an Endoscope Washer Disinfector (EWD) is time-consuming. Ultraviolet light group C (UV-C) exposition is an alternative and fast disinfection method and has previously been shown to adequately reduce Colony Forming Units (CFUs) on FEs without a working channel. The objective of this study was to examine whether UV-C light is as effective in reducing CFUs on contaminated FEs without a working channel compared to the EWD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FEs without a working channel were collected in three different Otorhinolaryngology Departments in the Netherlands. After pharyngolaryngoscopy, a manual pre-cleaning with tap water was performed and a culture was collected by rolling the distal 8-10 cm of the FE over an agar plate. Next, the FE was randomly assigned to be disinfected with UV-C light (D60) or the EWD (gold standard). After disinfection, another culture was taken. The primary outcome was microbiological contamination, defined by Colony Forming Units (CFU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>600 FEs without a working channel were randomized. After clinical use and manual pre-cleaning, 239/300 (79.7%) FEs in the UV-C group and 262/300 (87.3%) FEs in the EWD group were contaminated (i.e., > 0 CFU). FEs without culture confirmed contamination were excluded from further analysis. After UV-C light disinfection, 195/239 (81.6%) FEs showed 0 CFUs, compared to 187/262 (71.4%) FEs disinfected with the EWD (p < 0.01). A multivariate logistics regression analysis showed an increased odds of 0 CFUs when using UV-C light (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.19-2.79; p < 0.01), conditional on participating hospitals and types of FE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UV-C light disinfection of FEs without a working channel appears more effective in reducing CFUs compared to the EWD and might be a good alternative disinfection method.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515285/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142493177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-19DOI: 10.1186/s13756-024-01485-3
Sandra Zingg, Sabine Kuster, Matthias von Rotz, Aurore Portmann, Adrian Egli, Helena M B Seth-Smith, Pascal Schlaepfer, Daniel Goldenberger, Stefano Bassetti, Stephan Marsch, Hans Pargger, Richard Kuehl, Sarah Tschudin-Sutter
An outbreak of OXA-23-producing carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii amongst ICU-patients with COVID-19 likely occurred by transmission through inanimate surfaces, potentially facilitated by a contaminated positioning pillow shared between patients. Subsequent rapid spread may have been caused by exposure to respiratory secretions contaminating healthcare worker's gloves and gowns during prone positioning.
{"title":"Outbreak with OXA-23-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in a COVID-19 ICU cohort: unraveling routes of transmission.","authors":"Sandra Zingg, Sabine Kuster, Matthias von Rotz, Aurore Portmann, Adrian Egli, Helena M B Seth-Smith, Pascal Schlaepfer, Daniel Goldenberger, Stefano Bassetti, Stephan Marsch, Hans Pargger, Richard Kuehl, Sarah Tschudin-Sutter","doi":"10.1186/s13756-024-01485-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13756-024-01485-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An outbreak of OXA-23-producing carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii amongst ICU-patients with COVID-19 likely occurred by transmission through inanimate surfaces, potentially facilitated by a contaminated positioning pillow shared between patients. Subsequent rapid spread may have been caused by exposure to respiratory secretions contaminating healthcare worker's gloves and gowns during prone positioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491009/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142456355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-15DOI: 10.1186/s13756-024-01479-1
Alexandra Peters, Pierre Parneix, Didier Pittet
{"title":"Clean Hospitals Day 2024: the technical domains of healthcare environmental hygiene.","authors":"Alexandra Peters, Pierre Parneix, Didier Pittet","doi":"10.1186/s13756-024-01479-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-024-01479-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475947/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142456353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-15DOI: 10.1186/s13756-024-01480-8
Qing Chen, Wei He, Juan Du, Wanli Kang, Liping Zou, Xianzhen Tang, Peijun Tang, Chunhui Guo, Qing Pan, Qingdong Zhu, Song Yang, Zhouli Guo, Guihui Wu, Shenjie Tang
Background: We aimed to evaluate the predictors for early and interim culture conversion within 2 months and 6 months of treatment in multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) patients in China.
Methods: This study included adult MDR/RR-TB patients with a positive baseline sputum culture from 8 institutions located in different cities in China from May 2018 to January 2022. We mainly used logistic regression model to derive possible predictors of early and interim culture conversion.
Results: A total of 813 patients were enrolled and 28.5% of them received multidrug-resistant treatment regimens containing bedaquiline. Of these, 362 (44.5%) patients experienced culture conversion within 2 months of treatment, and 649 (79.8%) within 6 months. The results of the multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that acid-fast bacilli smear positive (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.637, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.197-2.238), cavities (aOR = 1.539, 95% CI = 1.132-2.092), bilateral disease (aOR = 1.638, 95% CI = 1.183-2.269), and viral hepatitis (aOR = 2.585, 95% CI = 1.189-5.622) were identified as risk factors for early culture un-conversion within 2 months of treatment. Additionally, smoking history (aOR = 2.197, 95% CI = 1.475-3.273), previous treatment for tuberculosis (aOR = 1.909, 95% CI = 1.282-2.844), bilateral disease (aOR = 2.201, 95% CI = 1.369-3.537), viral hepatitis (aOR = 2.329, 95% CI = 1.094-4.962) were identified as risk factors for interim culture un-conversion within 6 months of treatment, while patients with regimen containing bedaquiline (aOR = 0.310, 95% CI = 0.191-0.502) was a protective factor.
Conclusions: A history of smoking, a baseline sputum AFB smear positive, lung cavities, bilateral disease, previous anti-tuberculosis treatment, or a comorbidity of viral hepatitis can be used as the predictors for early and interim culture un-conversion in MDR/RR-TB patients, while bedaquiline was a protective factor .
背景:我们旨在评估中国耐多药/耐利福平肺结核(MDR/RR-TB)患者在治疗2个月和6个月内早期和中期痰培养转阴的预测因素:本研究纳入了2018年5月至2022年1月期间来自中国不同城市8家机构的基线痰培养阳性的成年MDR/RR-TB患者。我们主要采用逻辑回归模型得出早期和中期培养转阴的可能预测因素:共有813名患者入组,其中28.5%的患者接受了含有贝达喹啉的耐多药治疗方案。其中,362 例(44.5%)患者在治疗 2 个月内经历了培养转换,649 例(79.8%)患者在 6 个月内经历了培养转换。多变量逻辑回归分析结果显示,酸性革兰氏染色阳性(调整赔率 [aOR] = 1.637,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.197-2.238)、龋齿(aOR = 1.539,95% CI = 1.132-2.092)、双侧疾病(aOR = 1.638,95% CI = 1.183-2.269)和病毒性肝炎(aOR = 2.585,95% CI = 1.189-5.622)被确定为治疗后 2 个月内早期培养未转阴的危险因素。此外,吸烟史(aOR = 2.197,95% CI = 1.475-3.273)、曾接受结核病治疗(aOR = 1.909,95% CI = 1.282-2.844)、双侧疾病(aOR = 2.201,95% CI = 1.369-3.537)、病毒性肝炎(aOR = 2.329,95% CI = 1.094-4.962)被认为是治疗后 6 个月内中期培养未转阴的风险因素,而使用含有贝达喹啉的治疗方案的患者(aOR = 0.310,95% CI = 0.191-0.502)是一个保护因素:吸烟史、基线痰 AFB 涂片阳性、肺空洞、双侧疾病、既往接受过抗结核治疗或合并病毒性肝炎可作为 MDR/RR-TB 患者早期和中期培养未转阴的预测因素,而贝达喹啉是一个保护因素。
{"title":"Predictors of early and interim culture un-conversion in multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: a retrospective multi-center cohort study in China.","authors":"Qing Chen, Wei He, Juan Du, Wanli Kang, Liping Zou, Xianzhen Tang, Peijun Tang, Chunhui Guo, Qing Pan, Qingdong Zhu, Song Yang, Zhouli Guo, Guihui Wu, Shenjie Tang","doi":"10.1186/s13756-024-01480-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-024-01480-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the predictors for early and interim culture conversion within 2 months and 6 months of treatment in multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) patients in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included adult MDR/RR-TB patients with a positive baseline sputum culture from 8 institutions located in different cities in China from May 2018 to January 2022. We mainly used logistic regression model to derive possible predictors of early and interim culture conversion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 813 patients were enrolled and 28.5% of them received multidrug-resistant treatment regimens containing bedaquiline. Of these, 362 (44.5%) patients experienced culture conversion within 2 months of treatment, and 649 (79.8%) within 6 months. The results of the multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that acid-fast bacilli smear positive (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.637, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.197-2.238), cavities (aOR = 1.539, 95% CI = 1.132-2.092), bilateral disease (aOR = 1.638, 95% CI = 1.183-2.269), and viral hepatitis (aOR = 2.585, 95% CI = 1.189-5.622) were identified as risk factors for early culture un-conversion within 2 months of treatment. Additionally, smoking history (aOR = 2.197, 95% CI = 1.475-3.273), previous treatment for tuberculosis (aOR = 1.909, 95% CI = 1.282-2.844), bilateral disease (aOR = 2.201, 95% CI = 1.369-3.537), viral hepatitis (aOR = 2.329, 95% CI = 1.094-4.962) were identified as risk factors for interim culture un-conversion within 6 months of treatment, while patients with regimen containing bedaquiline (aOR = 0.310, 95% CI = 0.191-0.502) was a protective factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A history of smoking, a baseline sputum AFB smear positive, lung cavities, bilateral disease, previous anti-tuberculosis treatment, or a comorbidity of viral hepatitis can be used as the predictors for early and interim culture un-conversion in MDR/RR-TB patients, while bedaquiline was a protective factor .</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481364/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142456356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-14DOI: 10.1186/s13756-024-01482-6
Wenfeng Gao, Weina Wang, Jing Li, Yuan Gao, Shu Zhang, Hui Lei, Lu He, Ting Li, Jinge He
Background: Multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (TB; MDR/RR-TB) is a significant public health threat. However, the mechanisms involved in its transmission in Sichuan, China are unclear. To provide a scientific basis for MDR/RR-TB control and prevention, we investigated the drug-resistance characteristics, genetic diversity, and transmission dynamics and analyzed the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients to identify risk factors for the acquisition of MDR/RR-TB in Sichuan, Western China.
Methods: Whole-genome sequencing was performed using a sample comprised of all MDR/RR-TB strains isolated from patients with pulmonary TB (≥ 15 years) at the 22 surveillance sites in Sichuan province between January 2019 and December 2021, to analyze genotypic drug resistance and genetic diversity. Moreover, we performed statistical analyses of the epidemiological characteristics and risk factors associated with the transmission dynamics of MDR/RR-TB.
Results: The final analysis included 278 MDR/RR TB strains. Lineage 2.2, the major sub-lineage, accounted for 82.01% (228/278) of isolates, followed by lineage 4.5 (9.72%, 27/278), lineage 4.4 (6.83%, 19/278), and lineage 4.2 (1.44%, 4/278). The drug resistance rates, ranging from high to low, were as follows: isoniazid (229 [82.37%]), streptomycin (177 [63.67%]), ethambutol (144 [51.80%]), pyrazinamide (PZA, 119 [42.81%]), fluoroquinolones (FQs, 93 [33.45%]). Further, the clofazimine, bedaquiline, and delamanid resistance rates were 2.88, 2.88, and 1.04%, respectively. The gene composition cluster rate was 32.37% (90/278). In addition, 83.81% (233/278) of MDR/RR-TB cases were determined to be likely caused by transmission. Finally, patients infected with lineage two strains and strains with the KatG S315T amino acid substitution presented a higher risk of MDR/RR-TB transmission.
Conclusion: Transmission plays a significant role in the MDR/RR-TB burden in Sichuan province, and lineage 2 strains and strains harboring KatG S315T have a high probability of transmission. Further, high levels of FQ and PZA drug resistance suggest an urgent need for drug susceptibility testing prior to designing therapeutic regimens. New anti-TB drugs need to be used standardly and TB strains should be regularly monitored for resistance to these drugs.
{"title":"Drug-resistance characteristics, genetic diversity, and transmission dynamics of multidrug-resistant or rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis from 2019 to 2021 in Sichuan, China.","authors":"Wenfeng Gao, Weina Wang, Jing Li, Yuan Gao, Shu Zhang, Hui Lei, Lu He, Ting Li, Jinge He","doi":"10.1186/s13756-024-01482-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-024-01482-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (TB; MDR/RR-TB) is a significant public health threat. However, the mechanisms involved in its transmission in Sichuan, China are unclear. To provide a scientific basis for MDR/RR-TB control and prevention, we investigated the drug-resistance characteristics, genetic diversity, and transmission dynamics and analyzed the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients to identify risk factors for the acquisition of MDR/RR-TB in Sichuan, Western China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Whole-genome sequencing was performed using a sample comprised of all MDR/RR-TB strains isolated from patients with pulmonary TB (≥ 15 years) at the 22 surveillance sites in Sichuan province between January 2019 and December 2021, to analyze genotypic drug resistance and genetic diversity. Moreover, we performed statistical analyses of the epidemiological characteristics and risk factors associated with the transmission dynamics of MDR/RR-TB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included 278 MDR/RR TB strains. Lineage 2.2, the major sub-lineage, accounted for 82.01% (228/278) of isolates, followed by lineage 4.5 (9.72%, 27/278), lineage 4.4 (6.83%, 19/278), and lineage 4.2 (1.44%, 4/278). The drug resistance rates, ranging from high to low, were as follows: isoniazid (229 [82.37%]), streptomycin (177 [63.67%]), ethambutol (144 [51.80%]), pyrazinamide (PZA, 119 [42.81%]), fluoroquinolones (FQs, 93 [33.45%]). Further, the clofazimine, bedaquiline, and delamanid resistance rates were 2.88, 2.88, and 1.04%, respectively. The gene composition cluster rate was 32.37% (90/278). In addition, 83.81% (233/278) of MDR/RR-TB cases were determined to be likely caused by transmission. Finally, patients infected with lineage two strains and strains with the KatG S315T amino acid substitution presented a higher risk of MDR/RR-TB transmission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transmission plays a significant role in the MDR/RR-TB burden in Sichuan province, and lineage 2 strains and strains harboring KatG S315T have a high probability of transmission. Further, high levels of FQ and PZA drug resistance suggest an urgent need for drug susceptibility testing prior to designing therapeutic regimens. New anti-TB drugs need to be used standardly and TB strains should be regularly monitored for resistance to these drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472436/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142456354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}