不同类型排斥反应受体的血常规和外周血淋巴细胞亚群的特征性变化。

Shuaiyu Luo, Manhua Nie, Lei Song, Yixin Xie, Mingda Zhong, Shubo Tan, Rong An, Pan Li, Liang Tan, Xubiao Xie
{"title":"不同类型排斥反应受体的血常规和外周血淋巴细胞亚群的特征性变化。","authors":"Shuaiyu Luo, Manhua Nie, Lei Song, Yixin Xie, Mingda Zhong, Shubo Tan, Rong An, Pan Li, Liang Tan, Xubiao Xie","doi":"10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.230543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Rejection remains the most important factor limiting the survival of transplanted kidneys. Although a pathological biopsy of the transplanted kidney is the gold standard for diagnosing rejection, its limitations prevent it from being used as a routine monitoring method. Recently, peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulation testing has become an important means of assessing the body's immune system, however, its application value and strategy in the field of kidney transplantation need further exploration. Additionally, the development and utilization of routine test parameters are also important methods for exploring diagnostic strategies and predictive models for kidney transplant diseases. This study aims to explore the correlation between peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations and T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), as well as their diagnostic value, in conjunction with routine blood tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 154 kidney transplant recipients, who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were treated at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January to December, 2021, were selected as the study subjects. They were assigned into a stable group, a TCMR group, and an ABMR group, based on the occurrence and type of rejection. The basic and clinical data of these recipients were retrospectively analyzed and compared among the 3 groups. The transplant kidney function, routine blood tests, and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulation data of the TCMR group and the ABMR group before rejection treatment were compared with those of the stable group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stable, TCMR group, and ABMR group showed no statistically significant differences in immunosuppressive maintenance regimens or sources of transplanted kidneys (all <i>P</i>>0.05). However, the post-transplant duration was significantly longer in the ABMR group compared with the stable group (<i>P</i><0.001) and the TCMR group (<i>P</i><0.05). Regarding kidney function, serum creatinine levels in the ABMR group were higher than in the stable group and the TCMR group (both <i>P</i><0.01), with the TCMR group also showing higher levels than the stable group (<i>P</i><0.01). Both TCMR and ABMR groups had significantly higher blood urea nitrogen levels than the stable group (<i>P</i><0.01), with no statistically significant difference between TCMR and ABMR groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was lower in both TCMR and ABMR groups compared with the stable group (both <i>P</i><0.01). In routine blood tests, the ABMR group had lower hemoglobin, red blood cell count, and platelet count than the stable group (all <i>P</i><0.05). The TCMR group had higher neutrophil percentage (<i>P</i><0.05) and count (<i>P</i><0.05) than the stable group, and the ABMR group had a higher neutrophil percentage than the stable group (<i>P</i><0.05). The eosinophil percentage and count in the TCMR group were lower than in the stable and ABMR groups (all <i>P</i><0.05). Both TCMR and ABMR groups had lower basophil percentage and count, as well as lower lymphocyte percentage and count, compared with the stable group (all <i>P</i><0.05). There were no significant differences in monocyte percentage and count among the 3 groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). In lymphocyte subpopulations, the TCMR and ABMR groups had lower counts of CD45<sup>+</sup> cells and T cells compared with the stable group (all <i>P</i><0.05). The TCMR group also had lower counts of CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells, NK cells, and B cells than the stable group (all <i>P</i><0.05). There were no significant differences in the T cell percentage, CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell percentage, CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell percentage and their counts, CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell ratio, NK cell percentage, and B cell percentage among the stable, TCMR, and ABMR groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The occurrence of rejection leads to impaired transplant kidney function, accompanied by characteristic changes in some parameters of routine blood tests and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations in kidney transplant recipients. The different characteristics of changes in some parameters of routine blood tests and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations during TCMR and ABMR may help predict and diagnose rejection and differentiate between TCMR and ABMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":39801,"journal":{"name":"中南大学学报(医学版)","volume":"49 3","pages":"417-425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11208394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristic changes in blood routine and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations in recipients of different types of rejection.\",\"authors\":\"Shuaiyu Luo, Manhua Nie, Lei Song, Yixin Xie, Mingda Zhong, Shubo Tan, Rong An, Pan Li, Liang Tan, Xubiao Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.230543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Rejection remains the most important factor limiting the survival of transplanted kidneys. Although a pathological biopsy of the transplanted kidney is the gold standard for diagnosing rejection, its limitations prevent it from being used as a routine monitoring method. Recently, peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulation testing has become an important means of assessing the body's immune system, however, its application value and strategy in the field of kidney transplantation need further exploration. Additionally, the development and utilization of routine test parameters are also important methods for exploring diagnostic strategies and predictive models for kidney transplant diseases. This study aims to explore the correlation between peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations and T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), as well as their diagnostic value, in conjunction with routine blood tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 154 kidney transplant recipients, who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were treated at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January to December, 2021, were selected as the study subjects. They were assigned into a stable group, a TCMR group, and an ABMR group, based on the occurrence and type of rejection. The basic and clinical data of these recipients were retrospectively analyzed and compared among the 3 groups. The transplant kidney function, routine blood tests, and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulation data of the TCMR group and the ABMR group before rejection treatment were compared with those of the stable group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stable, TCMR group, and ABMR group showed no statistically significant differences in immunosuppressive maintenance regimens or sources of transplanted kidneys (all <i>P</i>>0.05). However, the post-transplant duration was significantly longer in the ABMR group compared with the stable group (<i>P</i><0.001) and the TCMR group (<i>P</i><0.05). Regarding kidney function, serum creatinine levels in the ABMR group were higher than in the stable group and the TCMR group (both <i>P</i><0.01), with the TCMR group also showing higher levels than the stable group (<i>P</i><0.01). Both TCMR and ABMR groups had significantly higher blood urea nitrogen levels than the stable group (<i>P</i><0.01), with no statistically significant difference between TCMR and ABMR groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was lower in both TCMR and ABMR groups compared with the stable group (both <i>P</i><0.01). In routine blood tests, the ABMR group had lower hemoglobin, red blood cell count, and platelet count than the stable group (all <i>P</i><0.05). The TCMR group had higher neutrophil percentage (<i>P</i><0.05) and count (<i>P</i><0.05) than the stable group, and the ABMR group had a higher neutrophil percentage than the stable group (<i>P</i><0.05). The eosinophil percentage and count in the TCMR group were lower than in the stable and ABMR groups (all <i>P</i><0.05). Both TCMR and ABMR groups had lower basophil percentage and count, as well as lower lymphocyte percentage and count, compared with the stable group (all <i>P</i><0.05). There were no significant differences in monocyte percentage and count among the 3 groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). In lymphocyte subpopulations, the TCMR and ABMR groups had lower counts of CD45<sup>+</sup> cells and T cells compared with the stable group (all <i>P</i><0.05). The TCMR group also had lower counts of CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells, NK cells, and B cells than the stable group (all <i>P</i><0.05). There were no significant differences in the T cell percentage, CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell percentage, CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell percentage and their counts, CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell ratio, NK cell percentage, and B cell percentage among the stable, TCMR, and ABMR groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The occurrence of rejection leads to impaired transplant kidney function, accompanied by characteristic changes in some parameters of routine blood tests and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations in kidney transplant recipients. The different characteristics of changes in some parameters of routine blood tests and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations during TCMR and ABMR may help predict and diagnose rejection and differentiate between TCMR and ABMR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中南大学学报(医学版)\",\"volume\":\"49 3\",\"pages\":\"417-425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11208394/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中南大学学报(医学版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.230543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中南大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.230543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:排斥反应仍然是限制移植肾存活的最重要因素。虽然移植肾的病理活检是诊断排斥反应的金标准,但其局限性使其无法用作常规监测方法。近来,外周血淋巴细胞亚群检测已成为评估机体免疫系统的重要手段,但其在肾移植领域的应用价值和策略还需进一步探索。此外,常规检测参数的开发和利用也是探索肾移植疾病诊断策略和预测模型的重要方法。本研究旨在结合血常规检验,探讨外周血淋巴细胞亚群与 T 细胞介导的排斥反应(TCMR)和抗体介导的排斥反应(ABMR)之间的相关性及其诊断价值:选取2021年1月至12月在中南大学湘雅二医院接受治疗、符合纳入和排除标准的154名肾移植受者作为研究对象。根据排斥反应的发生和类型,将他们分为稳定组、TCMR 组和 ABMR 组。研究人员对这些受者的基本数据和临床数据进行了回顾性分析,并对三组数据进行了比较。将TCMR组和ABMR组在排斥治疗前的移植肾功能、血常规检查和外周血淋巴细胞亚群数据与稳定组进行比较:结果:稳定组、TCMR 组和 ABMR 组在免疫抑制维持方案和移植肾来源方面差异无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。然而,与稳定组相比,ABMR 组的移植后持续时间明显更长(PPPPPP>0.05)。与稳定组相比,TCMR 组和 ABMR 组的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)均较低(均 PPPPPP>0.05)。在淋巴细胞亚群中,TCMR组和ABMR组的CD45+细胞和T细胞计数低于稳定组(稳定组、TCMR组和ABMR组的所有P+ T细胞百分比、CD8+ T细胞百分比及其计数、CD4+/CD8+ T细胞比率、NK细胞百分比和B细胞百分比均高于TCMR组和ABMR组(所有P+ T细胞百分比、CD8+ T细胞百分比及其计数、CD4+/CD8+ T细胞比率、NK细胞百分比和B细胞百分比均P>0.05):排斥反应的发生会导致移植肾功能受损,同时肾移植受者血常规检查的一些指标和外周血淋巴细胞亚群也会发生特征性变化。TCMR和ABMR期间血常规检查和外周血淋巴细胞亚群的一些参数变化的不同特征可能有助于预测和诊断排斥反应,以及区分TCMR和ABMR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characteristic changes in blood routine and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations in recipients of different types of rejection.

Objectives: Rejection remains the most important factor limiting the survival of transplanted kidneys. Although a pathological biopsy of the transplanted kidney is the gold standard for diagnosing rejection, its limitations prevent it from being used as a routine monitoring method. Recently, peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulation testing has become an important means of assessing the body's immune system, however, its application value and strategy in the field of kidney transplantation need further exploration. Additionally, the development and utilization of routine test parameters are also important methods for exploring diagnostic strategies and predictive models for kidney transplant diseases. This study aims to explore the correlation between peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations and T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), as well as their diagnostic value, in conjunction with routine blood tests.

Methods: A total of 154 kidney transplant recipients, who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were treated at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January to December, 2021, were selected as the study subjects. They were assigned into a stable group, a TCMR group, and an ABMR group, based on the occurrence and type of rejection. The basic and clinical data of these recipients were retrospectively analyzed and compared among the 3 groups. The transplant kidney function, routine blood tests, and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulation data of the TCMR group and the ABMR group before rejection treatment were compared with those of the stable group.

Results: The stable, TCMR group, and ABMR group showed no statistically significant differences in immunosuppressive maintenance regimens or sources of transplanted kidneys (all P>0.05). However, the post-transplant duration was significantly longer in the ABMR group compared with the stable group (P<0.001) and the TCMR group (P<0.05). Regarding kidney function, serum creatinine levels in the ABMR group were higher than in the stable group and the TCMR group (both P<0.01), with the TCMR group also showing higher levels than the stable group (P<0.01). Both TCMR and ABMR groups had significantly higher blood urea nitrogen levels than the stable group (P<0.01), with no statistically significant difference between TCMR and ABMR groups (P>0.05). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was lower in both TCMR and ABMR groups compared with the stable group (both P<0.01). In routine blood tests, the ABMR group had lower hemoglobin, red blood cell count, and platelet count than the stable group (all P<0.05). The TCMR group had higher neutrophil percentage (P<0.05) and count (P<0.05) than the stable group, and the ABMR group had a higher neutrophil percentage than the stable group (P<0.05). The eosinophil percentage and count in the TCMR group were lower than in the stable and ABMR groups (all P<0.05). Both TCMR and ABMR groups had lower basophil percentage and count, as well as lower lymphocyte percentage and count, compared with the stable group (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in monocyte percentage and count among the 3 groups (all P>0.05). In lymphocyte subpopulations, the TCMR and ABMR groups had lower counts of CD45+ cells and T cells compared with the stable group (all P<0.05). The TCMR group also had lower counts of CD4+ T cells, NK cells, and B cells than the stable group (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the T cell percentage, CD4+ T cell percentage, CD8+ T cell percentage and their counts, CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratio, NK cell percentage, and B cell percentage among the stable, TCMR, and ABMR groups (all P>0.05).

Conclusions: The occurrence of rejection leads to impaired transplant kidney function, accompanied by characteristic changes in some parameters of routine blood tests and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations in kidney transplant recipients. The different characteristics of changes in some parameters of routine blood tests and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations during TCMR and ABMR may help predict and diagnose rejection and differentiate between TCMR and ABMR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中南大学学报(医学版)
中南大学学报(医学版) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8237
期刊介绍: Journal of Central South University (Medical Sciences), founded in 1958, is a comprehensive academic journal of medicine and health sponsored by the Ministry of Education and Central South University. The journal has been included in many important databases and authoritative abstract journals at home and abroad, such as the American Medline, Pubmed and its Index Medicus (IM), the Netherlands Medical Abstracts (EM), the American Chemical Abstracts (CA), the WHO Western Pacific Region Medical Index (WPRIM), and the Chinese Science Citation Database (Core Database) (CSCD); it is a statistical source journal of Chinese scientific and technological papers, a Chinese core journal, and a "double-effect" journal of the Chinese Journal Matrix; it is the "2nd, 3rd, and 4th China University Excellent Science and Technology Journal", "2008 China Excellent Science and Technology Journal", "RCCSE China Authoritative Academic Journal (A+)" and Hunan Province's "Top Ten Science and Technology Journals". The purpose of the journal is to reflect the new achievements, new technologies, and new experiences in medical research, medical treatment, and teaching, report new medical trends at home and abroad, promote academic exchanges, improve academic standards, and promote scientific and technological progress.
期刊最新文献
Multidisciplinary integration and fusion based on critical care medicine and immunology: History, current status, and prospects. Pre-assembled nanospheres in mucoadhesive microneedle patch for sustained release of triamcinolone in the treatment of oral submucous fibrosis. Pyroptosis and sepsis-associated acute kidney injury. Regulatory role of the mTOR signaling pathway in autophagy and mesangial proliferation in IgA nephropathy. Research progress in anti-renal fibrosis drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1