{"title":"在电动汽车中使用超级电容器的经济评估","authors":"Hossein Rezaei, Seyed Ehsan Abdollahi, Seyedreza Abdollahi, Shaahin Filizadeh","doi":"10.1002/ente.202400395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main challenge of hybridizing ultracapacitors (UCs) with batteries in electric vehicles is their uncertain economic viability, besides their complexity and weight, which should be fully addressed. Therefore, this article determines the general condition for achieving a justified economic system, which is held when the average annual cost (AAC) of a battery‐UC system over a vehicle's useful life is lower than the annual cost of a sole‐battery for a specific system design, energy management strategy, vehicle type, and driving style. As such, the energy storage system is designed in a case study vehicle, and the optimal current distribution is found by dynamic programming (DP) under UDDS, HWFET, and US06 driving cycles. Then, by economic analysis, it is indicated that although adding an UC incurs additional costs, it saves the AAC by improving the battery health and prolonging its lifespan up to a maximum of 15‐year calendar life, which proves its economic justification. Investing in UCs is more economically viable for vehicles with severe driving cycles and high current stress. Finally, the DP optimal trajectory is implemented into an experimental setup under the US06 driving cycle to verify the evaluated strategy.","PeriodicalId":11573,"journal":{"name":"Energy technology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Evaluation of Using Ultracapacitors in Electric Vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Rezaei, Seyed Ehsan Abdollahi, Seyedreza Abdollahi, Shaahin Filizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ente.202400395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main challenge of hybridizing ultracapacitors (UCs) with batteries in electric vehicles is their uncertain economic viability, besides their complexity and weight, which should be fully addressed. Therefore, this article determines the general condition for achieving a justified economic system, which is held when the average annual cost (AAC) of a battery‐UC system over a vehicle's useful life is lower than the annual cost of a sole‐battery for a specific system design, energy management strategy, vehicle type, and driving style. As such, the energy storage system is designed in a case study vehicle, and the optimal current distribution is found by dynamic programming (DP) under UDDS, HWFET, and US06 driving cycles. Then, by economic analysis, it is indicated that although adding an UC incurs additional costs, it saves the AAC by improving the battery health and prolonging its lifespan up to a maximum of 15‐year calendar life, which proves its economic justification. Investing in UCs is more economically viable for vehicles with severe driving cycles and high current stress. Finally, the DP optimal trajectory is implemented into an experimental setup under the US06 driving cycle to verify the evaluated strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy technology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.202400395\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.202400395","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Economic Evaluation of Using Ultracapacitors in Electric Vehicles
The main challenge of hybridizing ultracapacitors (UCs) with batteries in electric vehicles is their uncertain economic viability, besides their complexity and weight, which should be fully addressed. Therefore, this article determines the general condition for achieving a justified economic system, which is held when the average annual cost (AAC) of a battery‐UC system over a vehicle's useful life is lower than the annual cost of a sole‐battery for a specific system design, energy management strategy, vehicle type, and driving style. As such, the energy storage system is designed in a case study vehicle, and the optimal current distribution is found by dynamic programming (DP) under UDDS, HWFET, and US06 driving cycles. Then, by economic analysis, it is indicated that although adding an UC incurs additional costs, it saves the AAC by improving the battery health and prolonging its lifespan up to a maximum of 15‐year calendar life, which proves its economic justification. Investing in UCs is more economically viable for vehicles with severe driving cycles and high current stress. Finally, the DP optimal trajectory is implemented into an experimental setup under the US06 driving cycle to verify the evaluated strategy.
期刊介绍:
Energy Technology provides a forum for researchers and engineers from all relevant disciplines concerned with the generation, conversion, storage, and distribution of energy.
This new journal shall publish articles covering all technical aspects of energy process engineering from different perspectives, e.g.,
new concepts of energy generation and conversion;
design, operation, control, and optimization of processes for energy generation (e.g., carbon capture) and conversion of energy carriers;
improvement of existing processes;
combination of single components to systems for energy generation;
design of systems for energy storage;
production processes of fuels, e.g., hydrogen, electricity, petroleum, biobased fuels;
concepts and design of devices for energy distribution.