利用循证决策和认知学徒方法培养学生的创业心态

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computer Applications in Engineering Education Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1002/cae.22779
Lisa Bosman, Alejandra Magana
{"title":"利用循证决策和认知学徒方法培养学生的创业心态","authors":"Lisa Bosman, Alejandra Magana","doi":"10.1002/cae.22779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developing one's entrepreneurial mindset is important for all students, regardless of discipline. Evidence‐based decision‐making (which has the potential to lower costs and improve quality of life) is one approach for applying entrepreneurially minded learning in the undergraduate classroom. This approach allows students to understand trends related to data, in general, and big data, specifically. Furthermore, it better prepares graduates to evaluate and identify effective data science‐based solutions. The purpose of this study is to report on one pedagogical approach to developing the entrepreneurial mindset through integrating evidence‐based decision‐making into the engineering and technology classroom using Microsoft Power BI Desktop (a freely available tool released by Microsoft in September 2013, where “BI” implies Business Intelligence). A mixed methods assessment was conducted including a rubric to measure students' effectiveness in applying the entrepreneurial mindset and a metacognitive reflection to better understand student motivation, awareness of learning, and engagement. First, the rubric was applied, and students were categorized by performance group (e.g., high, mid, low). Second, each performance group was analyzed to identify themes within the reflections. Our findings suggest that students in the high‐performing group communicated overall high levels of motivation, while students in the low‐performing group shared overall moderate levels of motivation. The relationship between performance and motivation among students in the mid‐performing group was inconclusive. Findings from our study suggest that there may be a relationship between students' performance and motivation. The key study implications relate to the use of new literacies, such as technological literacy, data literacy, and human literacy, as practices for promoting the development of an entrepreneurial mindset. Our findings suggest that our approach was effective in accomplishing this goal, but there is also room for improvement. Lessons learned and recommendations are provided.","PeriodicalId":50643,"journal":{"name":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using evidence‐based decision‐making and cognitive apprenticeship approach to develop students' entrepreneurial mindset\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Bosman, Alejandra Magana\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cae.22779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Developing one's entrepreneurial mindset is important for all students, regardless of discipline. Evidence‐based decision‐making (which has the potential to lower costs and improve quality of life) is one approach for applying entrepreneurially minded learning in the undergraduate classroom. This approach allows students to understand trends related to data, in general, and big data, specifically. Furthermore, it better prepares graduates to evaluate and identify effective data science‐based solutions. The purpose of this study is to report on one pedagogical approach to developing the entrepreneurial mindset through integrating evidence‐based decision‐making into the engineering and technology classroom using Microsoft Power BI Desktop (a freely available tool released by Microsoft in September 2013, where “BI” implies Business Intelligence). A mixed methods assessment was conducted including a rubric to measure students' effectiveness in applying the entrepreneurial mindset and a metacognitive reflection to better understand student motivation, awareness of learning, and engagement. First, the rubric was applied, and students were categorized by performance group (e.g., high, mid, low). Second, each performance group was analyzed to identify themes within the reflections. Our findings suggest that students in the high‐performing group communicated overall high levels of motivation, while students in the low‐performing group shared overall moderate levels of motivation. The relationship between performance and motivation among students in the mid‐performing group was inconclusive. Findings from our study suggest that there may be a relationship between students' performance and motivation. The key study implications relate to the use of new literacies, such as technological literacy, data literacy, and human literacy, as practices for promoting the development of an entrepreneurial mindset. Our findings suggest that our approach was effective in accomplishing this goal, but there is also room for improvement. Lessons learned and recommendations are provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Applications in Engineering Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Applications in Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22779\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22779","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

培养自己的创业思维对所有学生都很重要,无论其学科如何。基于证据的决策(有可能降低成本并提高生活质量)是在本科课堂上应用创业思维学习的一种方法。这种方法可以让学生了解与数据相关的趋势,特别是大数据。此外,它还能帮助毕业生更好地评估和确定基于数据科学的有效解决方案。本研究旨在报告一种教学方法,通过使用微软 Power BI Desktop(微软于 2013 年 9 月发布的一款免费工具,其中 "BI "意指商业智能)将循证决策融入工程与技术课堂,从而培养学生的创业思维。我们采用了一种混合方法进行评估,其中包括用于衡量学生应用创业思维有效性的评分标准,以及用于更好地了解学生学习动机、学习意识和参与度的元认知反思。首先,应用评分标准,将学生按成绩组别(如高、中、低)进行分类。其次,对每个成绩组进行分析,以确定反思的主题。我们的研究结果表明,成绩优秀组的学生总体上表现出较高的学习动机,而成绩较差组的学生总体上表现出中等程度的学习动机。成绩中等组学生的成绩与学习动机之间的关系尚无定论。我们的研究结果表明,学生的成绩与学习动机之间可能存在一定的关系。研究的主要意义在于利用新素养,如技术素养、数据素养和人文素养,来促进创业思维的发展。研究结果表明,我们的方法能有效实现这一目标,但也有改进的余地。本文提供了经验教训和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using evidence‐based decision‐making and cognitive apprenticeship approach to develop students' entrepreneurial mindset
Developing one's entrepreneurial mindset is important for all students, regardless of discipline. Evidence‐based decision‐making (which has the potential to lower costs and improve quality of life) is one approach for applying entrepreneurially minded learning in the undergraduate classroom. This approach allows students to understand trends related to data, in general, and big data, specifically. Furthermore, it better prepares graduates to evaluate and identify effective data science‐based solutions. The purpose of this study is to report on one pedagogical approach to developing the entrepreneurial mindset through integrating evidence‐based decision‐making into the engineering and technology classroom using Microsoft Power BI Desktop (a freely available tool released by Microsoft in September 2013, where “BI” implies Business Intelligence). A mixed methods assessment was conducted including a rubric to measure students' effectiveness in applying the entrepreneurial mindset and a metacognitive reflection to better understand student motivation, awareness of learning, and engagement. First, the rubric was applied, and students were categorized by performance group (e.g., high, mid, low). Second, each performance group was analyzed to identify themes within the reflections. Our findings suggest that students in the high‐performing group communicated overall high levels of motivation, while students in the low‐performing group shared overall moderate levels of motivation. The relationship between performance and motivation among students in the mid‐performing group was inconclusive. Findings from our study suggest that there may be a relationship between students' performance and motivation. The key study implications relate to the use of new literacies, such as technological literacy, data literacy, and human literacy, as practices for promoting the development of an entrepreneurial mindset. Our findings suggest that our approach was effective in accomplishing this goal, but there is also room for improvement. Lessons learned and recommendations are provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Computer Applications in Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Applications in Engineering Education provides a forum for publishing peer-reviewed timely information on the innovative uses of computers, Internet, and software tools in engineering education. Besides new courses and software tools, the CAE journal covers areas that support the integration of technology-based modules in the engineering curriculum and promotes discussion of the assessment and dissemination issues associated with these new implementation methods.
期刊最新文献
Performance of a Large‐Language Model in scoring construction management capstone design projects Issue Information Exploring tubular steady‐state laminar flow reactors with orthogonal collocation Effect of jigsaw‐integrated task‐driven learning on students' motivation, computational thinking, collaborative skills, and programming performance in a high‐school programming course Teaching experience for process identification using first‐order‐plus‐time‐delay models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1