实践出进步:利用基于能力的评估来评价伦理教学

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavior Analysis in Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1007/s40617-024-00949-7
Christen E. Russell, Jill Harper, Mary Jane Weiss, Jon Bailey
{"title":"实践出进步:利用基于能力的评估来评价伦理教学","authors":"Christen E. Russell, Jill Harper, Mary Jane Weiss, Jon Bailey","doi":"10.1007/s40617-024-00949-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This pre/post-group design examined the efficacy of using competency-based assessments to teach students of behavior analysis to engage in ethical decision making. Students in the experimental group received feedback on identifying potential, ethical scenarios in quizzes and Behavior Skills Training (BST) on identifying all components of and developing potential action plans for the 11-step decision-making model (Behavior Analyst Certification Board, 2020) and for role plays that simulated meetings that people would encounter in practice to review concerns, gain additional information, and develop solutions-based plans with relevant parties. Students in the control group received treatment as usual. The findings were not statistically significant, and students only met criteria for role plays. The content was iterated, and Study 2 was developed. In Study 2, two students received feedback on the identification of examples and nonexamples of ethical dilemmas and behavior analyst’s best course of action in the situation and BST on identifying and creating actions plans of the decision-making model. Both students met criteria for mastery. Implications, based on this preliminary research, for evidence-based practice and future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47310,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practice Makes Progress: Evaluating Ethics Instruction Using Competency-Based Assessments\",\"authors\":\"Christen E. Russell, Jill Harper, Mary Jane Weiss, Jon Bailey\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40617-024-00949-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This pre/post-group design examined the efficacy of using competency-based assessments to teach students of behavior analysis to engage in ethical decision making. Students in the experimental group received feedback on identifying potential, ethical scenarios in quizzes and Behavior Skills Training (BST) on identifying all components of and developing potential action plans for the 11-step decision-making model (Behavior Analyst Certification Board, 2020) and for role plays that simulated meetings that people would encounter in practice to review concerns, gain additional information, and develop solutions-based plans with relevant parties. Students in the control group received treatment as usual. The findings were not statistically significant, and students only met criteria for role plays. The content was iterated, and Study 2 was developed. In Study 2, two students received feedback on the identification of examples and nonexamples of ethical dilemmas and behavior analyst’s best course of action in the situation and BST on identifying and creating actions plans of the decision-making model. Both students met criteria for mastery. Implications, based on this preliminary research, for evidence-based practice and future research are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Analysis in Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Analysis in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-00949-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-00949-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这种前/后分组设计考察了使用基于能力的评估来教授行为分析专业学生参与道德决策的效果。实验组的学生在测验和行为技能培训(BST)中获得了关于识别潜在道德情景的反馈信息,包括识别 11 步决策模型(行为分析师认证委员会,2020 年)的所有组成部分和制定潜在行动计划,以及角色扮演,模拟人们在实践中会遇到的会议,以审查问题、获取更多信息并与相关方制定基于解决方案的计划。对照组的学生则照常接受治疗。研究结果没有统计学意义,学生只达到了角色扮演的标准。对内容进行了反复修改,并开发了研究 2。在 "研究 2 "中,两名学生收到了关于识别道德困境的实例和非实例以及行为分析师在这种情况下的最佳行动方案的反馈,以及关于识别和创建决策模型行动计划的 BST。两名学生都达到了掌握标准。本文讨论了基于这项初步研究的循证实践和未来研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Practice Makes Progress: Evaluating Ethics Instruction Using Competency-Based Assessments

This pre/post-group design examined the efficacy of using competency-based assessments to teach students of behavior analysis to engage in ethical decision making. Students in the experimental group received feedback on identifying potential, ethical scenarios in quizzes and Behavior Skills Training (BST) on identifying all components of and developing potential action plans for the 11-step decision-making model (Behavior Analyst Certification Board, 2020) and for role plays that simulated meetings that people would encounter in practice to review concerns, gain additional information, and develop solutions-based plans with relevant parties. Students in the control group received treatment as usual. The findings were not statistically significant, and students only met criteria for role plays. The content was iterated, and Study 2 was developed. In Study 2, two students received feedback on the identification of examples and nonexamples of ethical dilemmas and behavior analyst’s best course of action in the situation and BST on identifying and creating actions plans of the decision-making model. Both students met criteria for mastery. Implications, based on this preliminary research, for evidence-based practice and future research are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior Analysis in Practice
Behavior Analysis in Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
自引率
18.20%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Behavior Analysis in Practice, an official journal of the Association for Behavior Analysis International, is a peer-reviewed translational publication designed to provide science-based, best-practice information relevant to service delivery in behavior analysis. The target audience includes front-line service workers and their supervisors, scientist-practitioners, and school personnel. The mission of Behavior Analysis in Practice is to promote empirically validated best practices in an accessible format that describes not only what works, but also the challenges of implementation in practical settings. Types of articles and topics published  include empirical reports describing the application and evaluation of behavior-analytic procedures and programs; discussion papers on professional and practice issues; technical articles on methods, data analysis, or instrumentation in the practice of behavior analysis; tutorials on terms, procedures, and theories relevant to best practices in behavior analysis; and critical reviews of books and products that are aimed at practitioners or consumers of behavior analysis.
期刊最新文献
Facilitating Greater Understanding of Trauma-Informed Care in Applied Behavior Analysis: An Introduction to the Special Issue. The Effectiveness of Khan Academy in Teaching Elementary Math Procedural Integrity in Applied Settings: A Survey of Training, Practices, and Barriers Introducing "In Their Own Words" Special Series. Barriers to Careers in Behavior Analysis among Hispanic and Latinx Undergraduate Students: A Preliminary Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1