处于十字路口的大学教师:解读他们使用 ChatGPT 教学的意图

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1108/jarhe-10-2023-0463
Muhammad Jaffar, Nazir Ahmed Jogezai, Abdul Rais Abdul Latiff, Fozia Ahmed Baloch, Gulab Khan Khilji
{"title":"处于十字路口的大学教师:解读他们使用 ChatGPT 教学的意图","authors":"Muhammad Jaffar, Nazir Ahmed Jogezai, Abdul Rais Abdul Latiff, Fozia Ahmed Baloch, Gulab Khan Khilji","doi":"10.1108/jarhe-10-2023-0463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The objective of this study was to elucidate the intentions of university teachers regarding the utilization of ChatGPT for instructional purposes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>In this cross-sectional quantitative research, data were collected through an online survey tool from 493 university teachers across Pakistan.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings revealed that positive attitudes and a sense of perceived behavioral control had a positive impact on teachers' adoption of ChatGPT for instructional purposes. Conversely, subjective norms exhibited a significant negative influence. The results underscore that teachers are inclined to embrace ChatGPT for instructional cause due to their recognition of its educational utility. However, it does not appear that their social environment, which includes their coworkers and managers, has a significant impact on how they decide what to do.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The findings bear implications for devising relevant policies that support AI integration in curricula and assessments and teachers’ professional development (PD) programs. There is a need for formulating guidelines at the universities and the policy tiers to make the ChatGPT use more relevant. Future research should strive to generate insights toward AI use in the areas of curriculum, assessment and teachers’ PD.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The study adds to the relatively new literature on the integration of ChatGPT in higher education. This study’s findings contribute to the body of knowledge related to AI’s pedagogical use and set future directions to consider factors influencing meaningful and responsible use of AI in teaching and learning.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45508,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"University teachers at the crossroads: unpacking their intentions toward ChatGPT's instructional use\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Jaffar, Nazir Ahmed Jogezai, Abdul Rais Abdul Latiff, Fozia Ahmed Baloch, Gulab Khan Khilji\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jarhe-10-2023-0463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The objective of this study was to elucidate the intentions of university teachers regarding the utilization of ChatGPT for instructional purposes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>In this cross-sectional quantitative research, data were collected through an online survey tool from 493 university teachers across Pakistan.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The findings revealed that positive attitudes and a sense of perceived behavioral control had a positive impact on teachers' adoption of ChatGPT for instructional purposes. Conversely, subjective norms exhibited a significant negative influence. The results underscore that teachers are inclined to embrace ChatGPT for instructional cause due to their recognition of its educational utility. However, it does not appear that their social environment, which includes their coworkers and managers, has a significant impact on how they decide what to do.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The findings bear implications for devising relevant policies that support AI integration in curricula and assessments and teachers’ professional development (PD) programs. There is a need for formulating guidelines at the universities and the policy tiers to make the ChatGPT use more relevant. Future research should strive to generate insights toward AI use in the areas of curriculum, assessment and teachers’ PD.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The study adds to the relatively new literature on the integration of ChatGPT in higher education. This study’s findings contribute to the body of knowledge related to AI’s pedagogical use and set future directions to consider factors influencing meaningful and responsible use of AI in teaching and learning.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":45508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-10-2023-0463\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-10-2023-0463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究结果研究结果表明,积极的态度和行为控制感对教师采用 ChatGPT 进行教学有积极的影响。相反,主观规范则表现出明显的负面影响。研究结果表明,由于认识到 ChatGPT 的教育功能,教师倾向于将 ChatGPT 用于教学。研究局限/意义研究结果对制定相关政策以支持将人工智能纳入课程和评估以及教师专业发展(PD)计划具有重要意义。有必要在大学和政策层面制定指导方针,使 ChatGPT 的使用更具相关性。未来的研究应努力就人工智能在课程、评估和教师专业发展领域的应用提出见解。本研究的发现为与人工智能的教学应用相关的知识体系做出了贡献,并确定了未来的研究方向,以考虑影响在教学中有意识、负责任地使用人工智能的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
University teachers at the crossroads: unpacking their intentions toward ChatGPT's instructional use

Purpose

The objective of this study was to elucidate the intentions of university teachers regarding the utilization of ChatGPT for instructional purposes.

Design/methodology/approach

In this cross-sectional quantitative research, data were collected through an online survey tool from 493 university teachers across Pakistan.

Findings

The findings revealed that positive attitudes and a sense of perceived behavioral control had a positive impact on teachers' adoption of ChatGPT for instructional purposes. Conversely, subjective norms exhibited a significant negative influence. The results underscore that teachers are inclined to embrace ChatGPT for instructional cause due to their recognition of its educational utility. However, it does not appear that their social environment, which includes their coworkers and managers, has a significant impact on how they decide what to do.

Research limitations/implications

The findings bear implications for devising relevant policies that support AI integration in curricula and assessments and teachers’ professional development (PD) programs. There is a need for formulating guidelines at the universities and the policy tiers to make the ChatGPT use more relevant. Future research should strive to generate insights toward AI use in the areas of curriculum, assessment and teachers’ PD.

Originality/value

The study adds to the relatively new literature on the integration of ChatGPT in higher education. This study’s findings contribute to the body of knowledge related to AI’s pedagogical use and set future directions to consider factors influencing meaningful and responsible use of AI in teaching and learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Higher education around the world has become a major topic of discussion, debate, and controversy, as a range of political, economic, social, and technological pressures result in a myriad of changes at all levels. But the quality and quantity of critical dialogue and research and their relationship with practice remains limited. This internationally peer-reviewed journal addresses this shortfall by focusing on the scholarship and practice of teaching and learning and higher education and covers: - Higher education teaching, learning, curriculum, assessment, policy, management, leadership, and related areas - Digitization, internationalization, and democratization of higher education, and related areas such as lifelong and lifewide learning - Innovation, change, and reflections on current practices
期刊最新文献
Improving students’ academic integrity through academic integrity training (AIT) program in higher education Adapting accounting education to evolving business paradigm-an Indian perspective Second language writing anxiety and ChatGPT adoption as an automated writing evaluation tool Remote learning and exploring the factors affecting students' adoption of behavioral intentions toward conference applications Locus of control, academic procrastination and academic performance amongst university students: moderating role of parental involvement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1