Muhammad Jaffar, Nazir Ahmed Jogezai, Abdul Rais Abdul Latiff, Fozia Ahmed Baloch, Gulab Khan Khilji
{"title":"处于十字路口的大学教师:解读他们使用 ChatGPT 教学的意图","authors":"Muhammad Jaffar, Nazir Ahmed Jogezai, Abdul Rais Abdul Latiff, Fozia Ahmed Baloch, Gulab Khan Khilji","doi":"10.1108/jarhe-10-2023-0463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The objective of this study was to elucidate the intentions of university teachers regarding the utilization of ChatGPT for instructional purposes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>In this cross-sectional quantitative research, data were collected through an online survey tool from 493 university teachers across Pakistan.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings revealed that positive attitudes and a sense of perceived behavioral control had a positive impact on teachers' adoption of ChatGPT for instructional purposes. Conversely, subjective norms exhibited a significant negative influence. The results underscore that teachers are inclined to embrace ChatGPT for instructional cause due to their recognition of its educational utility. However, it does not appear that their social environment, which includes their coworkers and managers, has a significant impact on how they decide what to do.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The findings bear implications for devising relevant policies that support AI integration in curricula and assessments and teachers’ professional development (PD) programs. There is a need for formulating guidelines at the universities and the policy tiers to make the ChatGPT use more relevant. Future research should strive to generate insights toward AI use in the areas of curriculum, assessment and teachers’ PD.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The study adds to the relatively new literature on the integration of ChatGPT in higher education. This study’s findings contribute to the body of knowledge related to AI’s pedagogical use and set future directions to consider factors influencing meaningful and responsible use of AI in teaching and learning.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45508,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"University teachers at the crossroads: unpacking their intentions toward ChatGPT's instructional use\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Jaffar, Nazir Ahmed Jogezai, Abdul Rais Abdul Latiff, Fozia Ahmed Baloch, Gulab Khan Khilji\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jarhe-10-2023-0463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The objective of this study was to elucidate the intentions of university teachers regarding the utilization of ChatGPT for instructional purposes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>In this cross-sectional quantitative research, data were collected through an online survey tool from 493 university teachers across Pakistan.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The findings revealed that positive attitudes and a sense of perceived behavioral control had a positive impact on teachers' adoption of ChatGPT for instructional purposes. Conversely, subjective norms exhibited a significant negative influence. The results underscore that teachers are inclined to embrace ChatGPT for instructional cause due to their recognition of its educational utility. However, it does not appear that their social environment, which includes their coworkers and managers, has a significant impact on how they decide what to do.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The findings bear implications for devising relevant policies that support AI integration in curricula and assessments and teachers’ professional development (PD) programs. There is a need for formulating guidelines at the universities and the policy tiers to make the ChatGPT use more relevant. Future research should strive to generate insights toward AI use in the areas of curriculum, assessment and teachers’ PD.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The study adds to the relatively new literature on the integration of ChatGPT in higher education. This study’s findings contribute to the body of knowledge related to AI’s pedagogical use and set future directions to consider factors influencing meaningful and responsible use of AI in teaching and learning.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":45508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-10-2023-0463\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-10-2023-0463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
University teachers at the crossroads: unpacking their intentions toward ChatGPT's instructional use
Purpose
The objective of this study was to elucidate the intentions of university teachers regarding the utilization of ChatGPT for instructional purposes.
Design/methodology/approach
In this cross-sectional quantitative research, data were collected through an online survey tool from 493 university teachers across Pakistan.
Findings
The findings revealed that positive attitudes and a sense of perceived behavioral control had a positive impact on teachers' adoption of ChatGPT for instructional purposes. Conversely, subjective norms exhibited a significant negative influence. The results underscore that teachers are inclined to embrace ChatGPT for instructional cause due to their recognition of its educational utility. However, it does not appear that their social environment, which includes their coworkers and managers, has a significant impact on how they decide what to do.
Research limitations/implications
The findings bear implications for devising relevant policies that support AI integration in curricula and assessments and teachers’ professional development (PD) programs. There is a need for formulating guidelines at the universities and the policy tiers to make the ChatGPT use more relevant. Future research should strive to generate insights toward AI use in the areas of curriculum, assessment and teachers’ PD.
Originality/value
The study adds to the relatively new literature on the integration of ChatGPT in higher education. This study’s findings contribute to the body of knowledge related to AI’s pedagogical use and set future directions to consider factors influencing meaningful and responsible use of AI in teaching and learning.
期刊介绍:
Higher education around the world has become a major topic of discussion, debate, and controversy, as a range of political, economic, social, and technological pressures result in a myriad of changes at all levels. But the quality and quantity of critical dialogue and research and their relationship with practice remains limited. This internationally peer-reviewed journal addresses this shortfall by focusing on the scholarship and practice of teaching and learning and higher education and covers: - Higher education teaching, learning, curriculum, assessment, policy, management, leadership, and related areas - Digitization, internationalization, and democratization of higher education, and related areas such as lifelong and lifewide learning - Innovation, change, and reflections on current practices