Bruce G. Taylor, Weiwei Liu, Shalima Zalsha, Jackie Sheridan-Johnson, George Sabol, Clifton R. Lacy
{"title":"以青年为重点、以问题为导向的警务举措对犯罪的影响:三个城市的随机对照试验结果","authors":"Bruce G. Taylor, Weiwei Liu, Shalima Zalsha, Jackie Sheridan-Johnson, George Sabol, Clifton R. Lacy","doi":"10.1007/s11292-024-09629-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>This study tests whether Problem-Oriented Policing (POP) in hot spots of crime reduces property and violent crime in three cities, comparing POP versus control hot spots. We also examined low-levels versus high-levels of POP versus control on crime separately for pre-, during- and post-intervention.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This paper reports on a randomized controlled trial of POP replicated in three communities over one year using Poisson and negative binomial regression models.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We did not find any significant intervention effect on violent crimes post intervention in any of the three sites but observed some unintended iatrogenic/negative effect of lowlevel treatment on property crimes in two sites.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Due to difficulties experienced in implementing POP, we caution against concluding POP does not work. Instead, low level POP implementation during the era of post COVID-19 and anti-policing sentiment post the George Floyd murder may not be effective in reducing property and violent crime.</p>","PeriodicalId":47684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of a youth-focused problem-oriented policing initiative on crime: findings from a randomized controlled trial in three cities\",\"authors\":\"Bruce G. Taylor, Weiwei Liu, Shalima Zalsha, Jackie Sheridan-Johnson, George Sabol, Clifton R. Lacy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11292-024-09629-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objectives</h3><p>This study tests whether Problem-Oriented Policing (POP) in hot spots of crime reduces property and violent crime in three cities, comparing POP versus control hot spots. We also examined low-levels versus high-levels of POP versus control on crime separately for pre-, during- and post-intervention.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>This paper reports on a randomized controlled trial of POP replicated in three communities over one year using Poisson and negative binomial regression models.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>We did not find any significant intervention effect on violent crimes post intervention in any of the three sites but observed some unintended iatrogenic/negative effect of lowlevel treatment on property crimes in two sites.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Due to difficulties experienced in implementing POP, we caution against concluding POP does not work. Instead, low level POP implementation during the era of post COVID-19 and anti-policing sentiment post the George Floyd murder may not be effective in reducing property and violent crime.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Criminology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-024-09629-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-024-09629-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标本研究比较了在三个城市的犯罪热点地区开展以问题为导向的警务活动(POP)与对照热点地区的情况,检验了在犯罪热点地区开展以问题为导向的警务活动是否会减少财产犯罪和暴力犯罪。我们还分别对干预前、干预期间和干预后的低水平和高水平 POP 与对照组的犯罪情况进行了研究。方法本文采用泊松和负二项回归模型,报告了在三个社区复制的为期一年的 POP 随机对照试验。结果我们在三个地点均未发现干预后对暴力犯罪有任何明显的干预效果,但在两个地点观察到低水平治疗对财产犯罪产生了一些意外的先天性/负面影响。相反,在后 COVID-19 时代和乔治-弗洛伊德谋杀案后的反治安情绪时代实施低水平的民意调查可能无法有效减少财产犯罪和暴力犯罪。
The impact of a youth-focused problem-oriented policing initiative on crime: findings from a randomized controlled trial in three cities
Objectives
This study tests whether Problem-Oriented Policing (POP) in hot spots of crime reduces property and violent crime in three cities, comparing POP versus control hot spots. We also examined low-levels versus high-levels of POP versus control on crime separately for pre-, during- and post-intervention.
Methods
This paper reports on a randomized controlled trial of POP replicated in three communities over one year using Poisson and negative binomial regression models.
Results
We did not find any significant intervention effect on violent crimes post intervention in any of the three sites but observed some unintended iatrogenic/negative effect of lowlevel treatment on property crimes in two sites.
Conclusions
Due to difficulties experienced in implementing POP, we caution against concluding POP does not work. Instead, low level POP implementation during the era of post COVID-19 and anti-policing sentiment post the George Floyd murder may not be effective in reducing property and violent crime.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Criminology focuses on high quality experimental and quasi-experimental research in the advancement of criminological theory and/or the development of evidence based crime and justice policy. The journal is also committed to the advancement of the science of systematic reviews and experimental methods in criminology and criminal justice. The journal seeks empirical papers on experimental and quasi-experimental studies, systematic reviews on substantive criminological and criminal justice issues, and methodological papers on experimentation and systematic review. The journal encourages submissions from scholars in the broad array of scientific disciplines that are concerned with criminology as well as crime and justice problems.