Theertha Kariyathan, Ana Bastos, Markus Reichstein, Wouter Peters, Julia Marshall
{"title":"大气中的二氧化碳如何让我们了解生物圈碳吸收期的年度和十年期变化","authors":"Theertha Kariyathan, Ana Bastos, Markus Reichstein, Wouter Peters, Julia Marshall","doi":"10.5194/egusphere-2024-1382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Abstract.</strong> The carbon uptake period (CUP) refers to the time of each year during which the rate of photosynthetic uptake surpasses that of respiration in the terrestrial biosphere, resulting in a net absorption of CO<sub>2</sub> from the atmosphere to the land. Since climate drivers influence both photosynthesis and respiration, the CUP offers valuable insights into how the terrestrial biosphere responds to climate variations and affects the carbon budget. Several studies have assessed large-scale changes in CUP based on seasonal metrics from CO<sub>2</sub> mole fraction measurements. However, an in-depth understanding of the sensitivity of the CUP as derived from the CO<sub>2</sub> mole fraction data (CUP<sub>MR</sub>) to actual changes in the CUP of the net ecosystem exchange (CUP<sub>NEE</sub>) is missing. In this study, we specifically assess the impact of (i) atmospheric transport (ii) inter-annual variability in CUP<sub>NEE</sub> (iii) regional contribution to the signals that integrate at different background sites where CO<sub>2</sub> dry air mole fraction measurements are made. We conducted idealized simulations where we imposed known changes (∆) to the CUP<sub>NEE</sub> in the Northern Hemisphere to test the effect of the aforementioned factors in CUP<sub>MR</sub> metrics at ten Northern Hemisphere sites. Our analysis indicates a significant damping of changes in the simulated ∆CUP<sub>MR</sub> due to the integration of signals with varying CUP<sub>NEE</sub> timing across regions. CUP<sub>MR</sub> at well-studied sites such as Mauna Loa, Barrow, and Alert showed only 50 % of the applied ∆CUP<sub>NEE</sub> under non interannually-varying atmospheric transport conditions. Further, our synthetic analyses conclude that interannual variability (IAV) in atmospheric transport accounts for a significant part of the changes in the observed signals. However, even after separating the contribution of transport IAV, the estimates of surface changes in CUP by previous studies are not likely to provide an accurate magnitude of the actual changes occurring over the surface. The observed signal experiences significant damping as the atmosphere averages out non-synchronous signals from various regions.","PeriodicalId":8611,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How atmospheric CO2 can inform us on annual and decadal shifts in the biospheric carbon uptake period\",\"authors\":\"Theertha Kariyathan, Ana Bastos, Markus Reichstein, Wouter Peters, Julia Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/egusphere-2024-1382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Abstract.</strong> The carbon uptake period (CUP) refers to the time of each year during which the rate of photosynthetic uptake surpasses that of respiration in the terrestrial biosphere, resulting in a net absorption of CO<sub>2</sub> from the atmosphere to the land. Since climate drivers influence both photosynthesis and respiration, the CUP offers valuable insights into how the terrestrial biosphere responds to climate variations and affects the carbon budget. Several studies have assessed large-scale changes in CUP based on seasonal metrics from CO<sub>2</sub> mole fraction measurements. However, an in-depth understanding of the sensitivity of the CUP as derived from the CO<sub>2</sub> mole fraction data (CUP<sub>MR</sub>) to actual changes in the CUP of the net ecosystem exchange (CUP<sub>NEE</sub>) is missing. In this study, we specifically assess the impact of (i) atmospheric transport (ii) inter-annual variability in CUP<sub>NEE</sub> (iii) regional contribution to the signals that integrate at different background sites where CO<sub>2</sub> dry air mole fraction measurements are made. We conducted idealized simulations where we imposed known changes (∆) to the CUP<sub>NEE</sub> in the Northern Hemisphere to test the effect of the aforementioned factors in CUP<sub>MR</sub> metrics at ten Northern Hemisphere sites. Our analysis indicates a significant damping of changes in the simulated ∆CUP<sub>MR</sub> due to the integration of signals with varying CUP<sub>NEE</sub> timing across regions. CUP<sub>MR</sub> at well-studied sites such as Mauna Loa, Barrow, and Alert showed only 50 % of the applied ∆CUP<sub>NEE</sub> under non interannually-varying atmospheric transport conditions. Further, our synthetic analyses conclude that interannual variability (IAV) in atmospheric transport accounts for a significant part of the changes in the observed signals. However, even after separating the contribution of transport IAV, the estimates of surface changes in CUP by previous studies are not likely to provide an accurate magnitude of the actual changes occurring over the surface. The observed signal experiences significant damping as the atmosphere averages out non-synchronous signals from various regions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1382\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1382","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
How atmospheric CO2 can inform us on annual and decadal shifts in the biospheric carbon uptake period
Abstract. The carbon uptake period (CUP) refers to the time of each year during which the rate of photosynthetic uptake surpasses that of respiration in the terrestrial biosphere, resulting in a net absorption of CO2 from the atmosphere to the land. Since climate drivers influence both photosynthesis and respiration, the CUP offers valuable insights into how the terrestrial biosphere responds to climate variations and affects the carbon budget. Several studies have assessed large-scale changes in CUP based on seasonal metrics from CO2 mole fraction measurements. However, an in-depth understanding of the sensitivity of the CUP as derived from the CO2 mole fraction data (CUPMR) to actual changes in the CUP of the net ecosystem exchange (CUPNEE) is missing. In this study, we specifically assess the impact of (i) atmospheric transport (ii) inter-annual variability in CUPNEE (iii) regional contribution to the signals that integrate at different background sites where CO2 dry air mole fraction measurements are made. We conducted idealized simulations where we imposed known changes (∆) to the CUPNEE in the Northern Hemisphere to test the effect of the aforementioned factors in CUPMR metrics at ten Northern Hemisphere sites. Our analysis indicates a significant damping of changes in the simulated ∆CUPMR due to the integration of signals with varying CUPNEE timing across regions. CUPMR at well-studied sites such as Mauna Loa, Barrow, and Alert showed only 50 % of the applied ∆CUPNEE under non interannually-varying atmospheric transport conditions. Further, our synthetic analyses conclude that interannual variability (IAV) in atmospheric transport accounts for a significant part of the changes in the observed signals. However, even after separating the contribution of transport IAV, the estimates of surface changes in CUP by previous studies are not likely to provide an accurate magnitude of the actual changes occurring over the surface. The observed signal experiences significant damping as the atmosphere averages out non-synchronous signals from various regions.
期刊介绍:
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP) is a not-for-profit international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and public discussion of high-quality studies investigating the Earth''s atmosphere and the underlying chemical and physical processes. It covers the altitude range from the land and ocean surface up to the turbopause, including the troposphere, stratosphere, and mesosphere.
The main subject areas comprise atmospheric modelling, field measurements, remote sensing, and laboratory studies of gases, aerosols, clouds and precipitation, isotopes, radiation, dynamics, biosphere interactions, and hydrosphere interactions. The journal scope is focused on studies with general implications for atmospheric science rather than investigations that are primarily of local or technical interest.