舌下含服舒芬太尼用于终止妊娠引产过程中由患者控制的镇痛:一种有效且耐受性良好的方法。

Giulia Fierro, Barbara Milan, Elena Buelli, Dario Bugada, Erika Casarotta, Francesco Rizzo, Laura Ongaro, Paolo Gritti, Fabio Previdi, Ferdinando Luca Lorini
{"title":"舌下含服舒芬太尼用于终止妊娠引产过程中由患者控制的镇痛:一种有效且耐受性良好的方法。","authors":"Giulia Fierro, Barbara Milan, Elena Buelli, Dario Bugada, Erika Casarotta, Francesco Rizzo, Laura Ongaro, Paolo Gritti, Fabio Previdi, Ferdinando Luca Lorini","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00177-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective pain management during labor induction for pregnancy termination is essential. However, to date, no effective treatment has been identified. The primary aim of this study was to measure the analgesic efficacy of a sufentanil sublingual tablet system during pregnancy termination and patient satisfaction by comparing nulliparous and multiparous women. The secondary aims were to characterize the safety profile by reporting any side effects or adverse events and to determine the need for rescue therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational, retrospective, single-center study involving 48 women. The data retrieved for analysis included the total and hourly doses of sublingual sufentanil, evaluations of pain management satisfaction using a 5-point rating scale (ranging from 1, indicating \"not satisfied\" to 5, denoting \"completely satisfied\"), occurrence of side effects and adverse events, and the rate of rescue analgesic use. Categorical and numerical variables were compared between the two groups, and a correlation analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median total dose of sufentanil required was 60 mcg. Nulliparous women required a higher dose of sufentanil compared with multiparous women (105 mcg vs. 45 mcg; P = 0.01). Additionally, they underwent a longer labor, indirectly measured by the time of device usage (625 min vs. 165 min; P = 0.05). Regarding satisfaction, 40 patients (83.4%) were satisfied or completely satisfied, whereas only 8 patients (16.6%) reported dissatisfaction. Multiparous women exhibited higher satisfaction levels than did nulliparous women (P = 0.03). No adverse events were reported, and the most common side effects were nausea and vomiting (31.2%). Four patients (12%) required acetaminophen due to insufficient analgesia, with only one patient necessitating a switch to intravenous morphine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sublingual sufentanil was effective in both nulliparous and multiparous women with minimal side effects. Therefore, sublingual sufentanil can be considered a valid strategy for analgesia during labor induction for pregnancy termination.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11229235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sublingual sufentanil for patient-controlled analgesia during labor induction for pregnancy termination: an effective and well-tolerated approach.\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Fierro, Barbara Milan, Elena Buelli, Dario Bugada, Erika Casarotta, Francesco Rizzo, Laura Ongaro, Paolo Gritti, Fabio Previdi, Ferdinando Luca Lorini\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44158-024-00177-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective pain management during labor induction for pregnancy termination is essential. However, to date, no effective treatment has been identified. The primary aim of this study was to measure the analgesic efficacy of a sufentanil sublingual tablet system during pregnancy termination and patient satisfaction by comparing nulliparous and multiparous women. The secondary aims were to characterize the safety profile by reporting any side effects or adverse events and to determine the need for rescue therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational, retrospective, single-center study involving 48 women. The data retrieved for analysis included the total and hourly doses of sublingual sufentanil, evaluations of pain management satisfaction using a 5-point rating scale (ranging from 1, indicating \\\"not satisfied\\\" to 5, denoting \\\"completely satisfied\\\"), occurrence of side effects and adverse events, and the rate of rescue analgesic use. Categorical and numerical variables were compared between the two groups, and a correlation analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median total dose of sufentanil required was 60 mcg. Nulliparous women required a higher dose of sufentanil compared with multiparous women (105 mcg vs. 45 mcg; P = 0.01). Additionally, they underwent a longer labor, indirectly measured by the time of device usage (625 min vs. 165 min; P = 0.05). Regarding satisfaction, 40 patients (83.4%) were satisfied or completely satisfied, whereas only 8 patients (16.6%) reported dissatisfaction. Multiparous women exhibited higher satisfaction levels than did nulliparous women (P = 0.03). No adverse events were reported, and the most common side effects were nausea and vomiting (31.2%). Four patients (12%) required acetaminophen due to insufficient analgesia, with only one patient necessitating a switch to intravenous morphine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sublingual sufentanil was effective in both nulliparous and multiparous women with minimal side effects. Therefore, sublingual sufentanil can be considered a valid strategy for analgesia during labor induction for pregnancy termination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11229235/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-024-00177-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-024-00177-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在为终止妊娠而进行引产的过程中,有效控制疼痛至关重要。然而,迄今为止尚未发现有效的治疗方法。本研究的主要目的是通过比较无痛分娩妇女和多产妇,衡量舒芬太尼舌下片系统在终止妊娠期间的镇痛效果和患者满意度。次要目的是通过报告任何副作用或不良事件来描述其安全性,并确定是否需要进行抢救治疗:我们进行了一项观察性、回顾性、单中心研究,共有 48 名妇女参与。检索分析的数据包括舒芬太尼舌下含服的总剂量和每小时剂量、使用 5 级评分表(从 1 分表示 "不满意 "到 5 分表示 "完全满意")对疼痛管理满意度的评价、副作用和不良事件的发生率以及抢救性镇痛药的使用率。对两组患者的分类变量和数字变量进行了比较,并进行了相关分析:结果:所需舒芬太尼总剂量的中位数为60微克。与多胎产妇相比,无子宫产妇所需的舒芬太尼剂量更高(105 微克对 45 微克;P = 0.01)。此外,她们的产程更长,这可以通过使用设备的时间来间接衡量(625 分钟对 165 分钟;P = 0.05)。在满意度方面,40 名患者(83.4%)表示满意或完全满意,只有 8 名患者(16.6%)表示不满意。多产妇的满意度高于无产妇(P = 0.03)。没有不良反应报告,最常见的副作用是恶心和呕吐(31.2%)。四名患者(12%)因镇痛不足而需要对乙酰氨基酚,只有一名患者需要改用静脉注射吗啡:结论:舒芬太尼舌下含服对无痛分娩和多产妇均有效,且副作用极小。因此,舌下含服舒芬太尼可被视为终止妊娠引产过程中的一种有效镇痛策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sublingual sufentanil for patient-controlled analgesia during labor induction for pregnancy termination: an effective and well-tolerated approach.

Background: Effective pain management during labor induction for pregnancy termination is essential. However, to date, no effective treatment has been identified. The primary aim of this study was to measure the analgesic efficacy of a sufentanil sublingual tablet system during pregnancy termination and patient satisfaction by comparing nulliparous and multiparous women. The secondary aims were to characterize the safety profile by reporting any side effects or adverse events and to determine the need for rescue therapy.

Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, single-center study involving 48 women. The data retrieved for analysis included the total and hourly doses of sublingual sufentanil, evaluations of pain management satisfaction using a 5-point rating scale (ranging from 1, indicating "not satisfied" to 5, denoting "completely satisfied"), occurrence of side effects and adverse events, and the rate of rescue analgesic use. Categorical and numerical variables were compared between the two groups, and a correlation analysis was performed.

Results: The median total dose of sufentanil required was 60 mcg. Nulliparous women required a higher dose of sufentanil compared with multiparous women (105 mcg vs. 45 mcg; P = 0.01). Additionally, they underwent a longer labor, indirectly measured by the time of device usage (625 min vs. 165 min; P = 0.05). Regarding satisfaction, 40 patients (83.4%) were satisfied or completely satisfied, whereas only 8 patients (16.6%) reported dissatisfaction. Multiparous women exhibited higher satisfaction levels than did nulliparous women (P = 0.03). No adverse events were reported, and the most common side effects were nausea and vomiting (31.2%). Four patients (12%) required acetaminophen due to insufficient analgesia, with only one patient necessitating a switch to intravenous morphine.

Conclusions: Sublingual sufentanil was effective in both nulliparous and multiparous women with minimal side effects. Therefore, sublingual sufentanil can be considered a valid strategy for analgesia during labor induction for pregnancy termination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opioid system and related ligands: from the past to future perspectives. Abstracts of the ICARE 2024 78th SIAARTI National Congress. Lung ultrasound assessment of atelectasis following different anesthesia induction techniques in pediatric patients: a propensity score-matched, observational study. Management of analgosedation during noninvasive respiratory support: an expert Delphi consensus document developed by the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI). Neuropathic pain, antidepressant drugs, and inflammation: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1