用于糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的不含聚合物的支架:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Future cardiology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1080/14796678.2024.2370688
Filippo Luca Gurgoglione, Davide Donelli, Michele Antonelli, Luigi Vignali, Giorgio Benatti, Emilia Solinas, Iacopo Tadonio, Giulia Magnani, Andrea Denegri, Davide Lazzeroni, Rocco Antonio Montone, Riccardo C Bonadonna, Francesco Nicolini, Diego Ardissino, Giampaolo Niccoli
{"title":"用于糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的不含聚合物的支架:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Filippo Luca Gurgoglione, Davide Donelli, Michele Antonelli, Luigi Vignali, Giorgio Benatti, Emilia Solinas, Iacopo Tadonio, Giulia Magnani, Andrea Denegri, Davide Lazzeroni, Rocco Antonio Montone, Riccardo C Bonadonna, Francesco Nicolini, Diego Ardissino, Giampaolo Niccoli","doi":"10.1080/14796678.2024.2370688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To compare the efficacy of polymer-free drug-eluting stents (PF-DES) versus other stents in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.<b>Materials & methods:</b> A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials. The primary end point was the occurrence of target lesion failure.<b>Results:</b> Eight randomized controlled trials were included for a total of 4854 subjects. The PF-DES group experienced a trend in favor of a lower rate of target lesion failure (Incidence rate ratio = 0.91; <i>p</i> = 0.11) and a significantly lower rate of cardiac mortality, as compared with the control group (Incidence rate ratio = 0.82; <i>p</i> = 0.04). However, statistical significance was lost if bare-metal stent patients were excluded and a trend in favor of the PF-DES strategy was reported only for cardiac mortality.<b>Conclusion:</b> PF-DES could be a valuable strategy in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12589,"journal":{"name":"Future cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"485-497"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11485834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polymer-free stents for percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Luca Gurgoglione, Davide Donelli, Michele Antonelli, Luigi Vignali, Giorgio Benatti, Emilia Solinas, Iacopo Tadonio, Giulia Magnani, Andrea Denegri, Davide Lazzeroni, Rocco Antonio Montone, Riccardo C Bonadonna, Francesco Nicolini, Diego Ardissino, Giampaolo Niccoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14796678.2024.2370688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To compare the efficacy of polymer-free drug-eluting stents (PF-DES) versus other stents in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.<b>Materials & methods:</b> A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials. The primary end point was the occurrence of target lesion failure.<b>Results:</b> Eight randomized controlled trials were included for a total of 4854 subjects. The PF-DES group experienced a trend in favor of a lower rate of target lesion failure (Incidence rate ratio = 0.91; <i>p</i> = 0.11) and a significantly lower rate of cardiac mortality, as compared with the control group (Incidence rate ratio = 0.82; <i>p</i> = 0.04). However, statistical significance was lost if bare-metal stent patients were excluded and a trend in favor of the PF-DES strategy was reported only for cardiac mortality.<b>Conclusion:</b> PF-DES could be a valuable strategy in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"485-497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11485834/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2024.2370688\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2024.2370688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较无聚合物药物洗脱支架(PF-DES)与其他支架在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的糖尿病冠心病患者中的疗效。材料与方法:进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以确定相关的随机对照试验。主要终点是靶病变失败的发生率。结果:共纳入了 8 项随机对照试验,受试者总数为 4854 人。与对照组相比,PF-DES 组的靶病变失败率呈下降趋势(发生率比 = 0.91;P = 0.11),心脏死亡率显著降低(发生率比 = 0.82;P = 0.04)。然而,如果将裸金属支架患者排除在外,统计意义就不复存在了,只有在心脏死亡率方面,PF-DES 策略有获胜的趋势。结论:对于接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的糖尿病冠心病患者来说,PF-DES 是一种有价值的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Polymer-free stents for percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim: To compare the efficacy of polymer-free drug-eluting stents (PF-DES) versus other stents in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.Materials & methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials. The primary end point was the occurrence of target lesion failure.Results: Eight randomized controlled trials were included for a total of 4854 subjects. The PF-DES group experienced a trend in favor of a lower rate of target lesion failure (Incidence rate ratio = 0.91; p = 0.11) and a significantly lower rate of cardiac mortality, as compared with the control group (Incidence rate ratio = 0.82; p = 0.04). However, statistical significance was lost if bare-metal stent patients were excluded and a trend in favor of the PF-DES strategy was reported only for cardiac mortality.Conclusion: PF-DES could be a valuable strategy in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future cardiology
Future cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Research advances have contributed to improved outcomes across all specialties, but the rate of advancement in cardiology has been exceptional. Concurrently, the population of patients with cardiac conditions continues to grow and greater public awareness has increased patients" expectations of new drugs and devices. Future Cardiology (ISSN 1479-6678) reflects this new era of cardiology and highlights the new molecular approach to advancing cardiovascular therapy. Coverage will also reflect the major technological advances in bioengineering in cardiology in terms of advanced and robust devices, miniaturization, imaging, system modeling and information management issues.
期刊最新文献
Electrocardiographic and biochemical predictors of left ventricular remodeling early after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Severe acute recoil following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis in a heavily calcified bicuspid aortic valve. Single-center initial experience with a new pulsed-field ablation system: pulmonary vein isolation lesions and beyond. Soft drinks, fish oil and atrial fibrillation. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus echocardiography derived left ventricular ejection fraction for decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1