老年肌肉浸润性膀胱癌新辅助化疗的应用:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1007/s12032-024-02430-5
Wesley H Chou, Alexis Wang, Solange Bassale, Emile Latour, Sudhir Isharwal
{"title":"老年肌肉浸润性膀胱癌新辅助化疗的应用:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Wesley H Chou, Alexis Wang, Solange Bassale, Emile Latour, Sudhir Isharwal","doi":"10.1007/s12032-024-02430-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improves overall survival in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Older patients often do not receive NAC due to its potential toxicities. We examined treatment patterns of elderly MIBC patients as well as impact of NAC on survival in this population. The National Cancer Database was queried from 2006 to 2019 for stage T2-T4a MIBC patients ≥ 80 years old. Treatment exposures (extirpative surgery; chemotherapy; radiation) were ascertained. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated based on treatment modalities (no treatment; radiation only; chemotherapy only; chemoradiation; surgery only; NAC with surgery). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression assessed associations with overall survival (OS). The cohort included 16,391 patients (mean age 86 years); 51% received treatment. MIBC treatment was less common with advancing age; patients receiving NAC then surgery were younger and had lower comorbidity scores. From 2006 to 2019, more patients received chemoradiation, while rates of NAC rose modestly. Median OS for the NAC with surgery group was 48 months versus 9 months for the no treatment group. Log-rank tests showed significantly improved survival in the NAC with surgery group compared to the surgery only group, while Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed highest survival benefit in the NAC with surgery group. Only half of elderly MIBC patients received treatment, with fewer undergoing curative intent. NAC with surgery was associated with the greatest survival benefit. While our findings should be taken in the context of potential selection bias and patient preferences, they support NAC as part of shared-decision making regardless of age.</p>","PeriodicalId":18433,"journal":{"name":"Medical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in elderly patients: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Wesley H Chou, Alexis Wang, Solange Bassale, Emile Latour, Sudhir Isharwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12032-024-02430-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improves overall survival in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Older patients often do not receive NAC due to its potential toxicities. We examined treatment patterns of elderly MIBC patients as well as impact of NAC on survival in this population. The National Cancer Database was queried from 2006 to 2019 for stage T2-T4a MIBC patients ≥ 80 years old. Treatment exposures (extirpative surgery; chemotherapy; radiation) were ascertained. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated based on treatment modalities (no treatment; radiation only; chemotherapy only; chemoradiation; surgery only; NAC with surgery). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression assessed associations with overall survival (OS). The cohort included 16,391 patients (mean age 86 years); 51% received treatment. MIBC treatment was less common with advancing age; patients receiving NAC then surgery were younger and had lower comorbidity scores. From 2006 to 2019, more patients received chemoradiation, while rates of NAC rose modestly. Median OS for the NAC with surgery group was 48 months versus 9 months for the no treatment group. Log-rank tests showed significantly improved survival in the NAC with surgery group compared to the surgery only group, while Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed highest survival benefit in the NAC with surgery group. Only half of elderly MIBC patients received treatment, with fewer undergoing curative intent. NAC with surgery was associated with the greatest survival benefit. While our findings should be taken in the context of potential selection bias and patient preferences, they support NAC as part of shared-decision making regardless of age.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-024-02430-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-024-02430-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新辅助化疗(NAC)可提高肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的总生存率。由于新辅助化疗的潜在毒性,老年患者通常不接受新辅助化疗。我们研究了老年肌无力膀胱癌患者的治疗模式以及 NAC 对这一人群生存率的影响。我们查询了 2006 年至 2019 年期间全国癌症数据库中年龄≥ 80 岁的 T2-T4a 期 MIBC 患者。确定了治疗暴露(根治性手术、化疗、放疗)。根据治疗方式(无治疗;仅放疗;仅化疗;化放疗;仅手术;NAC加手术)生成卡普兰-梅耶生存曲线。多变量考克斯比例危险回归评估了与总生存期(OS)的关系。队列中包括16391名患者(平均年龄86岁);51%的患者接受了治疗。随着年龄的增长,接受MIBC治疗的患者越来越少;先接受NAC再接受手术的患者更年轻,合并症评分更低。从2006年到2019年,更多患者接受了化疗,而NAC的比例略有上升。NAC联合手术组的中位生存期为48个月,而未接受治疗组的中位生存期为9个月。对数秩检验显示,与单纯手术组相比,NAC联合手术组的生存率明显提高,而Cox比例危险回归分析显示,NAC联合手术组的生存率最高。只有一半的MIBC老年患者接受了治疗,其中接受根治性治疗的患者较少。NAC联合手术的生存获益最大。虽然我们的研究结果应考虑到潜在的选择偏差和患者的偏好,但它们支持将 NAC 作为共同决策的一部分,而不考虑年龄因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in elderly patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improves overall survival in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Older patients often do not receive NAC due to its potential toxicities. We examined treatment patterns of elderly MIBC patients as well as impact of NAC on survival in this population. The National Cancer Database was queried from 2006 to 2019 for stage T2-T4a MIBC patients ≥ 80 years old. Treatment exposures (extirpative surgery; chemotherapy; radiation) were ascertained. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated based on treatment modalities (no treatment; radiation only; chemotherapy only; chemoradiation; surgery only; NAC with surgery). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression assessed associations with overall survival (OS). The cohort included 16,391 patients (mean age 86 years); 51% received treatment. MIBC treatment was less common with advancing age; patients receiving NAC then surgery were younger and had lower comorbidity scores. From 2006 to 2019, more patients received chemoradiation, while rates of NAC rose modestly. Median OS for the NAC with surgery group was 48 months versus 9 months for the no treatment group. Log-rank tests showed significantly improved survival in the NAC with surgery group compared to the surgery only group, while Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed highest survival benefit in the NAC with surgery group. Only half of elderly MIBC patients received treatment, with fewer undergoing curative intent. NAC with surgery was associated with the greatest survival benefit. While our findings should be taken in the context of potential selection bias and patient preferences, they support NAC as part of shared-decision making regardless of age.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Oncology
Medical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
259
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Medical Oncology (MO) communicates the results of clinical and experimental research in oncology and hematology, particularly experimental therapeutics within the fields of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. It also provides state-of-the-art reviews on clinical and experimental therapies. Topics covered include immunobiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of malignant tumors.
期刊最新文献
Incidence of lymphedema related to various cancers The Sirt1/Nrf2 pathway is a key factor for drug therapy in chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity: a Mini-Review Lipid metabolism reprogramming in renal cell carcinomas. Current diagnostic and quantitative techniques in the field of lymphedema management: a critical review. The role of IL-22 in cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1