{"title":"多重聚合酶链式反应通过识别皮肤活检样本和鼻拭子中的麻风分枝杆菌对临床疑似纯神经性麻风病患者的诊断作用。","authors":"Vinay Kumar Pathak, Apoorva Sharma, Ayush Sharma, Itu Singh, Manjot Kaur, Tarun Narang, Debajyoti Chatterjee, Pragati Pandey, Manish Modi, Sunil Dogra, Seema Chhabra","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.23-0777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pure neuritic leprosy (PNL) often remains underdiagnosed due to the lack of simple, reliable diagnostic tools to detect Mycobacterium leprae. This study aimed to investigate the utility of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (MPCR) in easily accessible and less invasive biopsy sites, including skin biopsy samples and nasal swabs (NSs), to detect M. leprae. A total of 30 (N = 30) clinically suspected and untreated patients with PNL were recruited. Nasal swabs and skin biopsy samples from the innervation territory of an \"enlarged nerve\" were collected. DNA was extracted and subjected to MPCR (targeting leprae-specific repetitive element [RLEP], 16S rRNA, and SodA genes) and RLEP-PCR (individual gene PCR). The PCR products were analyzed by 3% agarose gel electrophoresis. In 30 patients with clinically suspected PNL, 60% (N = 18) of skin biopsy samples and 53% (N = 16) of NSs were found positive for M. leprae DNA by MPCR, whereas only 23.3% (N = 7) of skin biopsy samples and 10% (N = 3) of NSs were found positive by RLEP-PCR. MPCR demonstrated a greater positivity rate than did RLEP-PCR for detection of M. leprae. Serologic positivity for anti-natural disaccharide-octyl conjugated with bovine serum albumin (ND-O-BSA) antibodies was 80% (16/20), including 35% (7/20) of PNL patients for which the skin MPCR was negative. Both serologic positivity and skin MPCR positivity were observed in 65% of patients (N = 20). Multiplex polymerase chain reaction is a useful tool for detection for M. leprae in skin biopsy samples and NSs in clinically suspected cases of PNL, with the added advantages of being less invasive and technically easier than nerve biopsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7752,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Utility of Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction in Patients of Clinically Suspected Pure Neuritic Leprosy by Identifying Mycobacterium leprae in Skin Biopsy Samples and Nasal Swabs.\",\"authors\":\"Vinay Kumar Pathak, Apoorva Sharma, Ayush Sharma, Itu Singh, Manjot Kaur, Tarun Narang, Debajyoti Chatterjee, Pragati Pandey, Manish Modi, Sunil Dogra, Seema Chhabra\",\"doi\":\"10.4269/ajtmh.23-0777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pure neuritic leprosy (PNL) often remains underdiagnosed due to the lack of simple, reliable diagnostic tools to detect Mycobacterium leprae. This study aimed to investigate the utility of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (MPCR) in easily accessible and less invasive biopsy sites, including skin biopsy samples and nasal swabs (NSs), to detect M. leprae. A total of 30 (N = 30) clinically suspected and untreated patients with PNL were recruited. Nasal swabs and skin biopsy samples from the innervation territory of an \\\"enlarged nerve\\\" were collected. DNA was extracted and subjected to MPCR (targeting leprae-specific repetitive element [RLEP], 16S rRNA, and SodA genes) and RLEP-PCR (individual gene PCR). The PCR products were analyzed by 3% agarose gel electrophoresis. In 30 patients with clinically suspected PNL, 60% (N = 18) of skin biopsy samples and 53% (N = 16) of NSs were found positive for M. leprae DNA by MPCR, whereas only 23.3% (N = 7) of skin biopsy samples and 10% (N = 3) of NSs were found positive by RLEP-PCR. MPCR demonstrated a greater positivity rate than did RLEP-PCR for detection of M. leprae. Serologic positivity for anti-natural disaccharide-octyl conjugated with bovine serum albumin (ND-O-BSA) antibodies was 80% (16/20), including 35% (7/20) of PNL patients for which the skin MPCR was negative. Both serologic positivity and skin MPCR positivity were observed in 65% of patients (N = 20). Multiplex polymerase chain reaction is a useful tool for detection for M. leprae in skin biopsy samples and NSs in clinically suspected cases of PNL, with the added advantages of being less invasive and technically easier than nerve biopsy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376178/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.23-0777\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.23-0777","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic Utility of Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction in Patients of Clinically Suspected Pure Neuritic Leprosy by Identifying Mycobacterium leprae in Skin Biopsy Samples and Nasal Swabs.
Pure neuritic leprosy (PNL) often remains underdiagnosed due to the lack of simple, reliable diagnostic tools to detect Mycobacterium leprae. This study aimed to investigate the utility of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (MPCR) in easily accessible and less invasive biopsy sites, including skin biopsy samples and nasal swabs (NSs), to detect M. leprae. A total of 30 (N = 30) clinically suspected and untreated patients with PNL were recruited. Nasal swabs and skin biopsy samples from the innervation territory of an "enlarged nerve" were collected. DNA was extracted and subjected to MPCR (targeting leprae-specific repetitive element [RLEP], 16S rRNA, and SodA genes) and RLEP-PCR (individual gene PCR). The PCR products were analyzed by 3% agarose gel electrophoresis. In 30 patients with clinically suspected PNL, 60% (N = 18) of skin biopsy samples and 53% (N = 16) of NSs were found positive for M. leprae DNA by MPCR, whereas only 23.3% (N = 7) of skin biopsy samples and 10% (N = 3) of NSs were found positive by RLEP-PCR. MPCR demonstrated a greater positivity rate than did RLEP-PCR for detection of M. leprae. Serologic positivity for anti-natural disaccharide-octyl conjugated with bovine serum albumin (ND-O-BSA) antibodies was 80% (16/20), including 35% (7/20) of PNL patients for which the skin MPCR was negative. Both serologic positivity and skin MPCR positivity were observed in 65% of patients (N = 20). Multiplex polymerase chain reaction is a useful tool for detection for M. leprae in skin biopsy samples and NSs in clinically suspected cases of PNL, with the added advantages of being less invasive and technically easier than nerve biopsy.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, established in 1921, is published monthly by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It is among the top-ranked tropical medicine journals in the world publishing original scientific articles and the latest science covering new research with an emphasis on population, clinical and laboratory science and the application of technology in the fields of tropical medicine, parasitology, immunology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, basic and molecular biology, virology and international medicine.
The Journal publishes unsolicited peer-reviewed manuscripts, review articles, short reports, images in Clinical Tropical Medicine, case studies, reports on the efficacy of new drugs and methods of treatment, prevention and control methodologies,new testing methods and equipment, book reports and Letters to the Editor. Topics range from applied epidemiology in such relevant areas as AIDS to the molecular biology of vaccine development.
The Journal is of interest to epidemiologists, parasitologists, virologists, clinicians, entomologists and public health officials who are concerned with health issues of the tropics, developing nations and emerging infectious diseases. Major granting institutions including philanthropic and governmental institutions active in the public health field, and medical and scientific libraries throughout the world purchase the Journal.
Two or more supplements to the Journal on topics of special interest are published annually. These supplements represent comprehensive and multidisciplinary discussions of issues of concern to tropical disease specialists and health issues of developing countries