作为抗 CDK 靶向治疗转移性乳腺癌患者无进展生存期预测指标的基线和早期 18F-FDG PET/CT 评估。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Imaging Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1186/s40644-024-00727-2
Charline Lasnon, Adeline Morel, Nicolas Aide, Angélique Da Silva, George Emile
{"title":"作为抗 CDK 靶向治疗转移性乳腺癌患者无进展生存期预测指标的基线和早期 18F-FDG PET/CT 评估。","authors":"Charline Lasnon, Adeline Morel, Nicolas Aide, Angélique Da Silva, George Emile","doi":"10.1186/s40644-024-00727-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exploring the value of baseline and early <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT evaluations in prediction PFS in ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients treated with a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor in combination with an endocrine therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent a pre-therapeutic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and a second PET/CT within the first 6 months of treatment were retrospectively included. Metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and D<sub>max</sub>, which represents tumour dissemination and is defined as the distance between the two most distant lesions, were computed. The variation in these parameters between baseline and early evaluation PET as well as therapeutic evaluation using PERCIST were assessed as prognosticators of PFS at 18 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up was equal to 22.5 months. Thirty progressions occurred (45.4%). The average time to event was 17.8 ± 10.4 months. At baseline, D<sub>max</sub> was the only predictive metabolic parameter. Patients with a baseline D<sub>max</sub> ≤ 18.10 cm had a significantly better 18 m-PFS survival than the others: 69.2% (7.7%) versus 36.7% (8.8%), p = 0.017. There was no association between PERCIST evaluation and 18 m-PFS status (p = 0.149) and there was no difference in 18 m-PFS status between patients classified as complete, partial metabolic responders or having stable metabolic disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disease spread at baseline PET, as assessed by D<sub>max</sub>, is predictive of an event occurring within 18 months. In the absence of early metabolic progression, which occurs in 15% of patients, treatment should be continued regardless of the quality of the initial response to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Baseline and early <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT evaluations as predictors of progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with targeted anti-CDK therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Charline Lasnon, Adeline Morel, Nicolas Aide, Angélique Da Silva, George Emile\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40644-024-00727-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exploring the value of baseline and early <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT evaluations in prediction PFS in ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients treated with a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor in combination with an endocrine therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent a pre-therapeutic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and a second PET/CT within the first 6 months of treatment were retrospectively included. Metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and D<sub>max</sub>, which represents tumour dissemination and is defined as the distance between the two most distant lesions, were computed. The variation in these parameters between baseline and early evaluation PET as well as therapeutic evaluation using PERCIST were assessed as prognosticators of PFS at 18 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up was equal to 22.5 months. Thirty progressions occurred (45.4%). The average time to event was 17.8 ± 10.4 months. At baseline, D<sub>max</sub> was the only predictive metabolic parameter. Patients with a baseline D<sub>max</sub> ≤ 18.10 cm had a significantly better 18 m-PFS survival than the others: 69.2% (7.7%) versus 36.7% (8.8%), p = 0.017. There was no association between PERCIST evaluation and 18 m-PFS status (p = 0.149) and there was no difference in 18 m-PFS status between patients classified as complete, partial metabolic responders or having stable metabolic disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disease spread at baseline PET, as assessed by D<sub>max</sub>, is predictive of an event occurring within 18 months. In the absence of early metabolic progression, which occurs in 15% of patients, treatment should be continued regardless of the quality of the initial response to treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232230/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00727-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00727-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:探索基线和早期18F-FDG PET/CT评估在ER+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌患者接受细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶抑制剂联合内分泌治疗后预测PFS的价值:回顾性纳入了66例连续接受治疗前18F-FDG PET/CT和治疗后6个月内第二次PET/CT检查的乳腺癌患者。研究人员计算了代谢性肿瘤体积(MTV)、总病灶糖酵解量(TLG)和Dmax,Dmax代表肿瘤扩散情况,定义为两个最远病灶之间的距离。这些参数在基线和早期 PET 评估以及 PERCIST 治疗评估之间的变化被评估为 18 个月时的 PFS 预后指标:中位随访时间为22.5个月。发生了 30 例进展(45.4%)。平均进展时间为(17.8 ± 10.4)个月。在基线时,Dmax是唯一可预测的代谢参数。基线Dmax≤18.10厘米的患者的18个月PFS生存率明显高于其他患者:69.2%(7.7%)对36.7%(8.8%),P = 0.017。PERCIST评估与18 m-PFS状况之间没有关联(p = 0.149),被归类为完全、部分代谢反应者或代谢疾病稳定的患者之间的18 m-PFS状况也没有差异:结论:根据 Dmax 评估,基线 PET 的疾病扩散可预测 18 个月内发生的事件。在没有出现早期代谢进展的情况下(15% 的患者会出现这种情况),无论最初治疗反应的质量如何,都应继续治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Baseline and early 18F-FDG PET/CT evaluations as predictors of progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with targeted anti-CDK therapy.

Background: Exploring the value of baseline and early 18F-FDG PET/CT evaluations in prediction PFS in ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients treated with a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor in combination with an endocrine therapy.

Methods: Sixty-six consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent a pre-therapeutic 18F-FDG PET/CT and a second PET/CT within the first 6 months of treatment were retrospectively included. Metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and Dmax, which represents tumour dissemination and is defined as the distance between the two most distant lesions, were computed. The variation in these parameters between baseline and early evaluation PET as well as therapeutic evaluation using PERCIST were assessed as prognosticators of PFS at 18 months.

Results: The median follow-up was equal to 22.5 months. Thirty progressions occurred (45.4%). The average time to event was 17.8 ± 10.4 months. At baseline, Dmax was the only predictive metabolic parameter. Patients with a baseline Dmax ≤ 18.10 cm had a significantly better 18 m-PFS survival than the others: 69.2% (7.7%) versus 36.7% (8.8%), p = 0.017. There was no association between PERCIST evaluation and 18 m-PFS status (p = 0.149) and there was no difference in 18 m-PFS status between patients classified as complete, partial metabolic responders or having stable metabolic disease.

Conclusion: Disease spread at baseline PET, as assessed by Dmax, is predictive of an event occurring within 18 months. In the absence of early metabolic progression, which occurs in 15% of patients, treatment should be continued regardless of the quality of the initial response to treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Imaging
Cancer Imaging ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology. The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include: Breast Imaging Chest Complications of treatment Ear, Nose & Throat Gastrointestinal Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Imaging biomarkers Interventional Lymphoma Measurement of tumour response Molecular functional imaging Musculoskeletal Neuro oncology Nuclear Medicine Paediatric.
期刊最新文献
Prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis using a magnetic resonance imaging radiomics model of invasive breast cancer primary tumor Proceedings of ICIS SGCR-WIRES 2024, held jointly with the 23rd International Cancer Imaging Society Annual Conference, collaborating with the Singapore Radiological Society and College of Radiologists Singapore The utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting the pathological response and prognosis to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer Radiomics of multi-parametric MRI for the prediction of lung metastasis in soft-tissue sarcoma: a feasibility study. Optimization and validation of echo times of point-resolved spectroscopy for cystathionine detection in gliomas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1