{"title":"基于代谢热的比生长率估算器:估算模型的选择会影响生物过程的状态吗?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiosc.2024.05.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accurate and reliable estimation of specific growth rate (<span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow></math></span><span><span><span><span>) in real-time is pivotal for reliable process monitoring of a bioprocess and subsequent implementation of advanced control strategies. </span>Gibbs free energy dissipation is imminent for any biological system, and the </span>metabolic heat </span>flow measurements (calorimetry) formed the basis for estimating </span><span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow></math></span>. However, the rationale behind selecting a suitable <span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow></math></span> estimator model based on calorimetric perspective remains unexplored. The present investigation addresses the notion behind the selection of an appropriate estimator for <span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow></math></span> and the assessment of the estimator models was illustrated using different types of energy metabolism, namely, high exothermic and low exothermic processes. The results indicated that the <span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow></math></span> values from the instantaneous heat flow estimator significantly deviated (10-fold higher) from the offline values for highly exothermic process. Notably, the cumulative heat-based estimator accurately estimated <span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow></math></span> values on both types of energy metabolism with performance metrics <0.005 h<sup>−1</sup>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of bioscience and bioengineering","volume":"138 3","pages":"Pages 239-248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metabolic heat based specific growth rate estimators: Does the choice of estimation model influence the state of bioprocesses?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiosc.2024.05.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Accurate and reliable estimation of specific growth rate (<span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow></math></span><span><span><span><span>) in real-time is pivotal for reliable process monitoring of a bioprocess and subsequent implementation of advanced control strategies. </span>Gibbs free energy dissipation is imminent for any biological system, and the </span>metabolic heat </span>flow measurements (calorimetry) formed the basis for estimating </span><span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow></math></span>. However, the rationale behind selecting a suitable <span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow></math></span> estimator model based on calorimetric perspective remains unexplored. The present investigation addresses the notion behind the selection of an appropriate estimator for <span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow></math></span> and the assessment of the estimator models was illustrated using different types of energy metabolism, namely, high exothermic and low exothermic processes. The results indicated that the <span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow></math></span> values from the instantaneous heat flow estimator significantly deviated (10-fold higher) from the offline values for highly exothermic process. Notably, the cumulative heat-based estimator accurately estimated <span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow></math></span> values on both types of energy metabolism with performance metrics <0.005 h<sup>−1</sup>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of bioscience and bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"138 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 239-248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of bioscience and bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389172324001622\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of bioscience and bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389172324001622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Metabolic heat based specific growth rate estimators: Does the choice of estimation model influence the state of bioprocesses?
Accurate and reliable estimation of specific growth rate () in real-time is pivotal for reliable process monitoring of a bioprocess and subsequent implementation of advanced control strategies. Gibbs free energy dissipation is imminent for any biological system, and the metabolic heat flow measurements (calorimetry) formed the basis for estimating . However, the rationale behind selecting a suitable estimator model based on calorimetric perspective remains unexplored. The present investigation addresses the notion behind the selection of an appropriate estimator for and the assessment of the estimator models was illustrated using different types of energy metabolism, namely, high exothermic and low exothermic processes. The results indicated that the values from the instantaneous heat flow estimator significantly deviated (10-fold higher) from the offline values for highly exothermic process. Notably, the cumulative heat-based estimator accurately estimated values on both types of energy metabolism with performance metrics <0.005 h−1.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering is a research journal publishing original full-length research papers, reviews, and Letters to the Editor. The Journal is devoted to the advancement and dissemination of knowledge concerning fermentation technology, biochemical engineering, food technology and microbiology.