在现代 Pardigm 头颈部重建腓骨游离瓣虚拟手术规划中,与库存重建板相比,患者特异性植入物提高了容积手术精度。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2024.06.166
{"title":"在现代 Pardigm 头颈部重建腓骨游离瓣虚拟手术规划中,与库存重建板相比,患者特异性植入物提高了容积手术精度。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2024.06.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Virtual surgical planning (VSP) for composite microvascular free flaps<span> has become standard of care for oncologic head and neck reconstruction. Controversy remains as to the use of three-dimensional (3D)-printed patient-specific titanium implants (PSIs) versus hand-bent stock reconstruction plates. Proponents of PSIs cite improved surgical accuracy, reduced operative times, and improved clinical outcomes. Detractors purport increased cost associated with PSIs and presumed equivalent accuracy with less expensive stock plates.</span></div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The study purpose was to measure and compare the 3D-volumetric accuracy of PSI versus stock reconstruction plates among subjects undergoing VSP-guided mandibular fibular free flap reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design, Setting, Sample</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study of subjects undergoing VSP-guided fibular free flap reconstructions at Mayo Clinic between 2016 and 2023 was performed. Subjects were excluded for non-VSP guidance, midfacial reconstruction, nonfibular free flaps, and lack of requisite study variables.</div></div><div><h3>Predictor Variable</h3><div>The primary predictor was the type of reconstruction plate utilized (PSI vs stock plate).</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Variable</h3><div>The main outcome was volumetric surgical accuracy of the final reconstruction compared to the preoperative surgical plan by root mean square error (RMSE) calculation. Lower RMSE values indicated a higher surgical accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Covariates</h3><div>Covariates included age, sex, race, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System, Charlson Comorbidity Index, preoperative diagnosis, and number of fibular segments.</div></div><div><h3>Analyses</h3><div>Differences in surgical accuracy were assessed between preoperative and postoperative segmented scans using volumetric overlays from which RMSE values were calculated. Univariate and multivariate modeling of plate type to RMSE calculation was performed. Statistical significance set to <em>P</em> &lt; .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Total of 130 subjects were identified, 105 PSI and 25 stock plates. Calculated mean RMSE in millimeters (mm) for stock plates was 1.46 (standard deviation: 0.33) and 1.15 (standard deviation: 0.36) for PSIs. Univariate modeling demonstrated a statistically significant difference in RMSE of 0.31 (95% confidence interval: 0.16-0.47) (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) equating to a 21.2% (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) improved volumetric surgical accuracy for PSIs. The association of improved volumetric accuracy with PSIs has been maintained in all multivariate models controlling for confounding.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3><div>In modern era VSP-guided head and neck fibular free flap reconstruction, patient-specific 3D-printed titanium implants confer a statistically significant improvement in volumetric surgical accuracy over stock reconstruction plates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-specific Implants Improve Volumetric Surgical Accuracy Compared to Stock Reconstruction Plates in Modern Paradigm Virtual Surgical Planning of Fibular Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joms.2024.06.166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Virtual surgical planning (VSP) for composite microvascular free flaps<span> has become standard of care for oncologic head and neck reconstruction. Controversy remains as to the use of three-dimensional (3D)-printed patient-specific titanium implants (PSIs) versus hand-bent stock reconstruction plates. Proponents of PSIs cite improved surgical accuracy, reduced operative times, and improved clinical outcomes. Detractors purport increased cost associated with PSIs and presumed equivalent accuracy with less expensive stock plates.</span></div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The study purpose was to measure and compare the 3D-volumetric accuracy of PSI versus stock reconstruction plates among subjects undergoing VSP-guided mandibular fibular free flap reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design, Setting, Sample</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study of subjects undergoing VSP-guided fibular free flap reconstructions at Mayo Clinic between 2016 and 2023 was performed. Subjects were excluded for non-VSP guidance, midfacial reconstruction, nonfibular free flaps, and lack of requisite study variables.</div></div><div><h3>Predictor Variable</h3><div>The primary predictor was the type of reconstruction plate utilized (PSI vs stock plate).</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Variable</h3><div>The main outcome was volumetric surgical accuracy of the final reconstruction compared to the preoperative surgical plan by root mean square error (RMSE) calculation. Lower RMSE values indicated a higher surgical accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Covariates</h3><div>Covariates included age, sex, race, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System, Charlson Comorbidity Index, preoperative diagnosis, and number of fibular segments.</div></div><div><h3>Analyses</h3><div>Differences in surgical accuracy were assessed between preoperative and postoperative segmented scans using volumetric overlays from which RMSE values were calculated. Univariate and multivariate modeling of plate type to RMSE calculation was performed. Statistical significance set to <em>P</em> &lt; .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Total of 130 subjects were identified, 105 PSI and 25 stock plates. Calculated mean RMSE in millimeters (mm) for stock plates was 1.46 (standard deviation: 0.33) and 1.15 (standard deviation: 0.36) for PSIs. Univariate modeling demonstrated a statistically significant difference in RMSE of 0.31 (95% confidence interval: 0.16-0.47) (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) equating to a 21.2% (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) improved volumetric surgical accuracy for PSIs. The association of improved volumetric accuracy with PSIs has been maintained in all multivariate models controlling for confounding.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3><div>In modern era VSP-guided head and neck fibular free flap reconstruction, patient-specific 3D-printed titanium implants confer a statistically significant improvement in volumetric surgical accuracy over stock reconstruction plates.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278239124005780\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278239124005780","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:复合微血管游离瓣的虚拟手术规划(VSP)已成为头颈部肿瘤重建的标准治疗方法。关于使用三维(3D)打印的钛合金患者特异性植入物(PSI)还是手工弯曲的重建板,目前仍存在争议。PSIs 的支持者认为可以提高手术准确性、缩短手术时间并改善临床效果。目的:该研究的目的是测量和比较在 VSP 引导下进行下颌腓骨游离瓣重建的受试者使用 PSI 与普通重建板的三维容积精度:对2016年至2023年期间在梅奥诊所接受VSP引导下下颌腓骨游离瓣重建术的受试者进行回顾性队列研究。排除了非VSP引导、中面部重建、非腓骨游离瓣以及缺乏必要研究变量的受试者:主要预测因素是所使用的重建板类型(PSI 板与普通板):主要结果是通过均方根误差(RMSE)计算得出的最终重建与术前手术计划相比的体积手术准确性。RMSE值越低,手术准确性越高:协变量包括年龄、性别、种族、吸烟状况、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分类系统、查尔森综合指数、术前诊断和腓骨节段数:使用容积重叠法评估术前和术后分段扫描的手术准确性差异,并计算RMSE值。根据RMSE计算结果对钢板类型进行单变量和多变量建模。统计显著性设定为 P 结果:共确定了 130 个受试者,105 个 PSI 和 25 个库存平板。以毫米(mm)为单位计算的原板平均 RMSE 为 1.46(标准偏差:0.33),PSI 为 1.15(标准偏差:0.36)。单变量模型显示,RMSE 的差异为 0.31(95% 置信区间:0.16-0.47),具有统计学意义(P 结论及相关性:在现代 VSP 引导下的头颈部腓骨游离瓣重建中,患者特制的 3D 打印钛植入物与库存重建板相比,在体积手术准确性方面具有统计学意义的显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient-specific Implants Improve Volumetric Surgical Accuracy Compared to Stock Reconstruction Plates in Modern Paradigm Virtual Surgical Planning of Fibular Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction

Background

Virtual surgical planning (VSP) for composite microvascular free flaps has become standard of care for oncologic head and neck reconstruction. Controversy remains as to the use of three-dimensional (3D)-printed patient-specific titanium implants (PSIs) versus hand-bent stock reconstruction plates. Proponents of PSIs cite improved surgical accuracy, reduced operative times, and improved clinical outcomes. Detractors purport increased cost associated with PSIs and presumed equivalent accuracy with less expensive stock plates.

Purpose

The study purpose was to measure and compare the 3D-volumetric accuracy of PSI versus stock reconstruction plates among subjects undergoing VSP-guided mandibular fibular free flap reconstruction.

Study Design, Setting, Sample

A retrospective cohort study of subjects undergoing VSP-guided fibular free flap reconstructions at Mayo Clinic between 2016 and 2023 was performed. Subjects were excluded for non-VSP guidance, midfacial reconstruction, nonfibular free flaps, and lack of requisite study variables.

Predictor Variable

The primary predictor was the type of reconstruction plate utilized (PSI vs stock plate).

Main Outcome Variable

The main outcome was volumetric surgical accuracy of the final reconstruction compared to the preoperative surgical plan by root mean square error (RMSE) calculation. Lower RMSE values indicated a higher surgical accuracy.

Covariates

Covariates included age, sex, race, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System, Charlson Comorbidity Index, preoperative diagnosis, and number of fibular segments.

Analyses

Differences in surgical accuracy were assessed between preoperative and postoperative segmented scans using volumetric overlays from which RMSE values were calculated. Univariate and multivariate modeling of plate type to RMSE calculation was performed. Statistical significance set to P < .05.

Results

Total of 130 subjects were identified, 105 PSI and 25 stock plates. Calculated mean RMSE in millimeters (mm) for stock plates was 1.46 (standard deviation: 0.33) and 1.15 (standard deviation: 0.36) for PSIs. Univariate modeling demonstrated a statistically significant difference in RMSE of 0.31 (95% confidence interval: 0.16-0.47) (P < .001) equating to a 21.2% (P < .001) improved volumetric surgical accuracy for PSIs. The association of improved volumetric accuracy with PSIs has been maintained in all multivariate models controlling for confounding.

Conclusion and Relevance

In modern era VSP-guided head and neck fibular free flap reconstruction, patient-specific 3D-printed titanium implants confer a statistically significant improvement in volumetric surgical accuracy over stock reconstruction plates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: This monthly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments and diagnostic equipment and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association.
期刊最新文献
Masthead Table of Contents Three-Dimensional Changes of Condylar Position After Bimaxillary Surgery to Correct Skeletal III Malocclusion: Cone Beam Computed Tomography Voxel-Based Superimposition Analysis The Risk of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Children: Guidance for Antiresorptive Use in Pediatric Patients An Unusual Clinical Presentation of Traumatic Ulcerative Granuloma With Stromal Eosinophilia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1